Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is CharacterX a Scam?

CAIBNB Chain
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Sep 4, 2026 · 1 audit on recordNew Launch · 2d old
SummaryAI Copilot

The audit reviewed the provided Solidity code for the CaiToken, which implements the ERC20 standard.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Ownership not renounced — Multisig
  • Top-10 concentration > 30%
  • LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
  • Token age < 7 days
Exact factors
  • Ownership NOT renounced — Multisig (2-of-3)
  • Top-10 concentration > 30% (100.0% total → 40.0% effective; 0.0% in EOAs, 100.0% in contracts — moderate)
  • LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
  • Token age < 7 days (early, volatile)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (2d old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Sep 45 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipRetained
MintNo mint
Liquidity lockUnknown
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Sep 4, 2026
100.0%Contracts
100.0%Contracts
ContractsBubble area = share of supply
100.0%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking100.0%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads40.0%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Sep 4, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Sep 4$116.8K across 2 pairs

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensUnknown

Whether the LP tokens are locked could not be determined.

Analysed pool$110.7KShare of depth94.8%

Security Findings

3 Info
Info

Safe Use of unchecked Blocks

The _update function utilizes unchecked blocks for arithmetic operations such as _balances[from] = fromBalance - value; and _balances[to] += value;. Similar unchecked blocks are used for _totalSupply adjustments during minting and burning. This pattern is observed in the _update function for both balance and total supply modifications.I-01

Issue

The _update function utilizes unchecked blocks for arithmetic operations such as _balances[from] = fromBalance - value; and _balances[to] += value;. Similar unchecked blocks are used for _totalSupply adjustments during minting and burning. This pattern is observed in the _update function for both balance and total supply modifications.

Fix

This is a standard and safe practice in Solidity 0.8+ for gas optimization. The necessary checks (e.g., if (fromBalance < value)) are performed prior to entering the unchecked block, ensuring that underflow conditions are reverted before the unchecked operation. No action is required as this implementation is secure.

Status

Resolved

Info

ERC20 approve Race Condition

The standard ERC20 approve function is susceptible to a known race condition. If a user approves an amount for a spender, and then attempts to change that approved amount, a malicious spender could front-run the second approve transaction. This allows the spender to spend the original allowance before the new allowance is set, potentially leading to the spender having access to the sum of both allowances.I-02

Issue

The standard ERC20 approve function is susceptible to a known race condition. If a user approves an amount for a spender, and then attempts to change that approved amount, a malicious spender could front-run the second approve transaction. This allows the spender to spend the original allowance before the new allowance is set, potentially leading to the spender having access to the sum of both allowances.

Fix

While not a vulnerability in the contract's code itself, it's an inherent risk of the ERC20 standard. Users should be advised to set their allowance to zero before setting a new non-zero allowance. Alternatively, consider implementing increaseAllowance and decreaseAllowance functions, which are safer alternatives for modifying allowances, to mitigate this risk.

Status

Unresolved

Info

Internal _mint and _burn Functions Require External Exposure and Access Control

The _mint and _burn functions are declared as internal within the abstract ERC20 contract. This means they cannot be called directly from external accounts. For the CaiToken to have minting or burning capabilities, the concrete CaiToken contract must implement external functions that wrap these internal calls.I-03

Issue

The _mint and _burn functions are declared as internal within the abstract ERC20 contract. This means they cannot be called directly from external accounts. For the CaiToken to have minting or burning capabilities, the concrete CaiToken contract must implement external functions that wrap these internal calls.

Fix

If CaiToken is intended to be a fixed-supply token, no action is needed. However, if minting or burning is desired, ensure that any external functions exposing _mint or _burn are protected by robust access control mechanisms (e.g., onlyOwner, onlyMinter roles) to prevent unauthorized supply manipulation. The prefill indicates a multisig owner, which would be an appropriate entity to control such functions.

Status

Unresolved

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Sep 4
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The audit reviewed the provided Solidity code for the CaiToken, which implements the ERC20 standard. The contract largely adheres to well-established patterns, leveraging robust OpenZeppelin-like structures. No critical or high-severity vulnerabilities were identified in the provided abstract ERC20 implementation.

Technical8/10Low risk

The technical architecture (7.1) is based on the widely adopted ERC20 standard, utilizing OpenZeppelin-like patterns for core functionalities like transfer and approve. Code security (7.2) is strong, with appropriate use of unchecked blocks for gas optimization, preceded by necessary checks to prevent underflows. The ECDSA library is included, indicating potential future use for permit functionality, enhancing user experience.

Governance4/10Medium risk

The economic model (7.4) is that of a standard ERC20 token, providing basic transfer and approval functionalities. Governance (7.5) is implied to be robust, with the prefill indicating a multisig owner () with a 2/3 threshold, which enhances security for administrative actions. The internal _mint and _burn functions require careful external exposure and access control in the concrete token implementation.

Upgrades7/10Low risk

The contract is not deployed as a proxy (7.7) and is not designed for upgradeability. This eliminates upgrade-related risks, ensuring immutability post-deployment. Operations (7.8) are straightforward for a standard token.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

It is recommended to ensure that any external functions built upon the internal _mint and _burn methods in the concrete CaiToken contract are protected by robust access control mechanisms, ideally leveraging the identified multisig owner.

Developers should also consider implementing increaseAllowance and decreaseAllowance functions to mitigate the known ERC20 approve race condition, enhancing user safety.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypeCaiToken
NetworkBNB Chain
Token age2d
Contract0x7e7e…b774
Deployer0x14b1…3a72
Badge for your website
CharacterX security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Sep 2, 202637Medium

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of CharacterX?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page