On-chain security analysis — is it a scam or legit?
BNB ChainThe ChainGPT token contract is a standard ERC20 implementation, inheriting from battle-tested OpenZeppelin libraries for core functionalities, burn capabilities, and ownership management.
Read the full analysisEach factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Sep 4, 2026
The 7 remaining pairs hold $54 between them and are not listed. The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.
0x5930…9fbe0x556b…d59e0x966d…e41a0x2951…29b10x8325…100f0x5f0f…29090xe505…9ae4No privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.
ChainGPT contract's constructor mints the entire initial token supply (1,000,000,000 tokens) directly to msg.sender (the contract deployer). This design choice results in a highly centralized initial distribution, where a single address holds 100% of the circulating supply. This centralization introduces significant economic risk, as the deployer has complete control over the initial market dynamics and distribution. A compromise of this single address could have a catastrophic impact on the token's ecosystem.H-01The ChainGPT contract's constructor mints the entire initial token supply (1,000,000,000 tokens) directly to msg.sender (the contract deployer). This design choice results in a highly centralized initial distribution, where a single address holds 100% of the circulating supply. This centralization introduces significant economic risk, as the deployer has complete control over the initial market dynamics and distribution. A compromise of this single address could have a catastrophic impact on the token's ecosystem.
While this is a common design for new tokens, it's crucial to acknowledge the associated risks. Implement a clear, transparent plan for token distribution to mitigate the risks of centralization. Consider using a vesting schedule, multi-signature wallets, or a timelock for large portions of the supply to reduce immediate control by a single entity.
Unresolved
ChainGPT token contract does not include a Pausable mechanism. In the event of a critical vulnerability discovery, a major market exploit, or other unforeseen circumstances, the contract owner would not have the ability to temporarily halt token transfers or other critical functions. This absence could lead to unmitigated losses or allow an exploit to propagate without immediate intervention, impacting the protocol's ability to respond to emergencies (7.8 Operations).M-01The ChainGPT token contract does not include a Pausable mechanism. In the event of a critical vulnerability discovery, a major market exploit, or other unforeseen circumstances, the contract owner would not have the ability to temporarily halt token transfers or other critical functions. This absence could lead to unmitigated losses or allow an exploit to propagate without immediate intervention, impacting the protocol's ability to respond to emergencies (7.8 Operations).
Integrate OpenZeppelin's Pausable contract or implement a similar mechanism that allows the owner (or a designated multi-signature wallet) to pause and unpause critical functions like transfer, transferFrom, approve, mint, and burn. This provides a crucial emergency stop-gap measure.
Unresolved
ChainGPT contract, these assets will become permanently locked and irrecoverable, leading to a loss for the sender.L-01The contract lacks functions to recover accidentally sent ERC20 tokens or native currency (e.g., BNB on BSC) that might be sent directly to the contract address. If users or other contracts mistakenly transfer assets to the ChainGPT contract, these assets will become permanently locked and irrecoverable, leading to a loss for the sender.
Implement a function, callable only by the contract owner, to recover arbitrary ERC20 tokens and native currency accidentally sent to the contract. This function should include checks to prevent the owner from withdrawing the contract's own CGPT tokens.
Unresolved
Ownable pattern, granting a single address (the owner) exclusive control over administrative functions such as transferOwnership and renounceOwnership. While this provides a clear administrative structure, it introduces a single point of failure. If the owner's private key is compromised, or if the owner acts maliciously, the integrity of these administrative controls could be jeopardized (7.3 Access Control).I-01The contract utilizes the Ownable pattern, granting a single address (the owner) exclusive control over administrative functions such as transferOwnership and renounceOwnership. While this provides a clear administrative structure, it introduces a single point of failure. If the owner's private key is compromised, or if the owner acts maliciously, the integrity of these administrative controls could be jeopardized (7.3 Access Control).
For enhanced security and decentralization, consider transferring ownership to a multi-signature wallet (e.g., Gnosis Safe) or a time-locked contract. This distributes control and adds a layer of protection against a single point of failure or malicious intent.
Unresolved
The ChainGPT token contract is a standard ERC20 implementation, inheriting from battle-tested OpenZeppelin libraries for core functionalities, burn capabilities, and ownership management. The contract mints a fixed total supply to the deployer upon creation. Key findings include a highly centralized initial token distribution and the absence of an emergency pause mechanism, which are common considerations for token contracts.
The ChainGPT token contract leverages battle-tested OpenZeppelin libraries for its ERC20, Ownable, and ERC20Burnable functionalities, ensuring a high standard of code security (7.2 Code Security). Arithmetic operations are protected against overflow/underflow by Solidity 0.8.0+ default checks or explicit require statements before unchecked blocks. Access control (7.3 Access Control) is managed via the Ownable pattern, restricting administrative functions like transferOwnership to the designated owner. A notable technical risk is the absence of a pause mechanism, which could limit emergency response capabilities.
The economic model (7.4 Economic) of the ChainGPT token is characterized by a fixed total supply, with the entire initial supply minted to the deployer, creating a highly centralized distribution at launch (7.1 Architecture). This centralization extends to governance (7.5 Governance) through the Ownable pattern, where a single address controls administrative functions, including the ability to transfer ownership. While this provides clear administrative control, it introduces a single point of failure if the owner's key is compromised or misused.
The ChainGPT contract is implemented as a standard, non-upgradeable contract (7.7 Upgrades). This design choice eliminates the complexities and potential risks associated with proxy patterns and upgrade mechanisms, such as storage collisions or logic errors during upgrades. However, it also means that any discovered vulnerabilities or desired feature enhancements would require a new contract deployment and a token migration process.
It is recommended to implement a Pausable mechanism to allow for emergency halts of critical token functions in unforeseen circumstances, enhancing the contract's resilience against potential exploits or market instability.
Additionally, consider adding a recovery function for accidentally sent ERC20 tokens or native currency to prevent permanent loss of assets due to user error. For long-term decentralization, explore strategies for distributing ownership and control over administrative functions, such as multi-signature wallets or a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO).
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Our AI-powered scanner gives you a deeper, real-time smart contract analysis — free, with every scoring factor shown.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page
