Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is Burn Agent a Scam?

BURNBNB Chain
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Nov 3, 2026 · 1 audit on recordNew Launch · 13h old
SummaryAI Copilot

The BurnAgentMixed contract implements an ERC-20 token with custom minting and transfer control logic.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through; held by idcollection: EOA
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded; held by idcollection: EOA
  • Ownership status UNKNOWN
  • Liquidity < $50k
  • Code: Precision Loss in Calculations
Exact factors
  • A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through; held by idcollection: EOA
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded; held by idcollection: EOA
  • Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
  • Liquidity < $50k ($41,119 across 1 pairs — thin market)
  • Code: Precision Loss in Calculations (Low, static analysis)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (13h old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Nov 34 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipUnknown
MintMintable
Liquidity lockLocked
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax2% / 2%

Holders

as of audit · Nov 3, 2026584 holders
5.2%Contracts3.4%5.3%Burned41.0%DEX pools45.0%Everyone else
5.2%3.4%5.3%41.0%DEX pools45.0%Everyone else
ContractsWalletsBurnedDEX poolsEveryone elseBubble area = share of supply
55.0%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking5.2%
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell3.4%
  • Burnedout of circulation5.3%
  • DEX poolsthe pools' own liquidity41.0%
  • Everyone else574 holders45.0%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads5.5%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Nov 3, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Nov 3$41.1K

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensLocked

The LP tokens of the analysed pool are locked or burned.

Analysed pool$41.1KShare of depth100.0%
LP Burned99.3% · ≈ permanent lock
LP Locked99.3% · Null Address
Unlocked LP held by
0x0ed9…9706

No privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.

Security Findings

2 Medium1 Low6 Info
Medium

Centralized Minting Authority

The functions mint, mintWithInviter, and openEarly allow privileged addresses to create new tokens at will. This can lead to significant supply inflation and dilution of existing token holders' value.CP-01

Issue

The functions mint, mintWithInviter, and openEarly allow privileged addresses to create new tokens at will. This can lead to significant supply inflation and dilution of existing token holders' value.

Fix

Implement a hard cap on the total supply or transition the minting authority to a decentralized governance contract.

Status

Unresolved

Medium

Administrative Control Over Transfers

Privileged addresses can toggle a switch that determines whether token transfers are permitted. This allows administrators to freeze user funds or restrict market liquidity arbitrarily.CP-05

Issue

Privileged addresses can toggle a switch that determines whether token transfers are permitted. This allows administrators to freeze user funds or restrict market liquidity arbitrarily.

Fix

Remove the transfer-blocking functionality or implement a community-voted mechanism to trigger such restrictions.

Status

Unresolved

Low

Precision Loss in Calculations

The functions _oracle and priceAt perform division before multiplication, which results in rounding errors. This can lead to inaccurate pricing and potential economic discrepancies.CD-01

Issue

The functions _oracle and priceAt perform division before multiplication, which results in rounding errors. This can lead to inaccurate pricing and potential economic discrepancies.

Fix

Rearrange the mathematical operations to perform multiplication before division, ensuring that intermediate values do not overflow.

Status

Unresolved

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 55.0% of supply. Of that, 5.3% burned, 41.0% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 3.4% in wallets, 5.2% in other contracts. 584 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 55.0% of supply. Of that, 5.3% burned, 41.0% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 3.4% in wallets, 5.2% in other contracts. 584 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Not listed by any independent source

584 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

584 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Liquidity burned — cannot be withdrawn

99.3% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 99.3% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone. 0.7% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. No single one holds a majority: their exits thin the market rather than hand anyone the pool. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY

Issue

99.3% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 99.3% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone. 0.7% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. No single one holds a majority: their exits thin the market rather than hand anyone the pool. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.

Fix

Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $41K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $258K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $41K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $258K (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: 2% on buy, 2% on sell. Market: $41K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: 2% on buy, 2% on sell. Market: $41K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.

Fix

Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Recently launched — less than a day of market history

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT

Issue

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.

Fix

Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Nov 3
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The BurnAgentMixed contract implements an ERC-20 token with custom minting and transfer control logic. The protocol relies on privileged roles (earlyopener, idcollection) to manage supply and transfer availability. While the core ERC-20 implementation is standard, the centralization of control over token issuance and transferability poses a significant risk to token holders.

Technical6/10Medium risk

The contract utilizes ReentrancyGuard to protect sensitive functions, which is a strong security practice. Code structure is modular, separating minting logic from standard ERC-20 operations. However, the reliance on external price oracles and internal state switches introduces potential points of failure. Specifically, the division before multiplication in price calculations may lead to precision loss.

Governance3/10High risk

The protocol exhibits high centralization, as privileged addresses have the authority to mint tokens and halt transfers at will. This creates a trust-based model where holders are vulnerable to administrative actions. There are no governance mechanisms or timelocks to mitigate the impact of compromised or malicious privileged keys.

Upgrades4/10Medium risk

The contract is not implemented as a proxy and is therefore immutable. This eliminates risks associated with logic upgrades or proxy storage collisions. The current state is fixed, providing transparency regarding the contract's future behavior.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

It is recommended to implement a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract to manage the privileged roles, reducing the risk of a single point of failure.

Additionally, consider adding a timelock for any administrative changes to transfer rules to provide transparency to the community. For mathematical operations, ensure that all multiplication occurs before division to maintain precision. Consider using a library like ABDKMath64x64 or OpenZeppelin's Math library to handle fixed-point arithmetic safely.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypeToken
NetworkBNB Chain
Token age13h
Contract0x7de1…b1c4
Deployer0x7a85…9210
Badge for your website
Burn Agent security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Nov 3, 202679High

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the BURN contract address?

The Burn Agent (BURN) contract on BNB Chain is 0x7de1606230aa70802caecf1a3e90039a6265b1c4. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.

Is Burn Agent a scam?

Quantum Audit's risk score for Burn Agent is 79/100 (High risk) as of Nov 3, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Mint: Mintable; Liquidity lock: Locked; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 2% / 2%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.

Is BURN liquidity locked?

Liquidity lock: Locked (as of Nov 3, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $41.1K.

Who holds BURN?

As of Nov 3, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 55.0% of the supply across 584 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Burn Agent?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified