Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

On-chain security analysis — is it a scam or legit?

Is BULLA Safe?

BNB Chain
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Oct 25, 2026 · 1 audit on record
SummaryAI Copilot

The Bulla contract is a standard ERC-20 token implementation.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Liquidity not locked
  • Top-10 concentration > 30%
Exact factors
  • Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool; this pool is 81% of DEX liquidity) — held by independent providers — market-depth risk
  • Top-10 concentration > 30% (57.2% total → 45.8% effective; 38.2% in EOAs, 19.0% in contracts)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Security Checklist

as of audit · Oct 255 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipUnknown
MintNo mint
Liquidity lockNot locked
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Oct 25, 202660,552 holders
19.0%Contracts38.2%Wallets42.8%Everyone else
19.0%Contracts38.2%Wallets42.8%Everyone else
ContractsWalletsEveryone elseBubble area = share of supply
57.2%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking19.0%
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell38.2%
  • Everyone else60,542 holders42.8%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads45.8%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 25, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Oct 25$82.5K across 11 pairs
LP tokensNot locked

The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.

Analysed pool$66.8KShare of depth81.1%
Top-1 Unlocked Holder45.8%
Top-3 Unlocked84.1%
Unlocked LP held by
0x2ee3…55d50x2fbe…da9a0x3b0c…3fcd0x1eee…ff6e0x1eef…4a410x29ce…07e40xe071…bee40x5c71…39c90x5fdd…8e510xfb19…560b

No privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.

Security Findings

1 Medium5 Info
Medium

Liquidity not locked

0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 93.7% is held, unlocked, by 10 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. No single one holds a majority: their exits thin the market rather than hand anyone the pool. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them. This assessment covers the main pool, which holds 81% of the token's DEX liquidity; the other pools were not assessed.QA-LIQUIDITY

Issue

0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 93.7% is held, unlocked, by 10 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. No single one holds a majority: their exits thin the market rather than hand anyone the pool. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them. This assessment covers the main pool, which holds 81% of the token's DEX liquidity; the other pools were not assessed.

Fix

Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

No issues identified in the reviewed source

The verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint capability, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.I-01

Issue

The verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint capability, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.

Fix

Re-check after any contract upgrade or ownership change, both of which can alter behaviour without changing this page.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 57.2% of supply. What remains: 38.2% in wallets, 19.0% in other contracts. 60,552 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 57.2% of supply. What remains: 38.2% in wallets, 19.0% in other contracts. 60,552 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Identity verified by independent sources

Listed on CoinGecko as BULLA (BULLA), market cap $34M, rank #596. 60,552 holders. Verified by: CoinGecko.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

Listed on CoinGecko as BULLA (BULLA), market cap $34M, rank #596. 60,552 holders. Verified by: CoinGecko.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $82K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $1.4M (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $601K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $82K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $1.4M (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $601K (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Meme token

A community token whose value comes from attention rather than a product. Being a meme is not a risk in itself: it is scored on exactly the same contract and market facts as any other token. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: CoinGecko category: Meme. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $82K of DEX liquidity across 11 pools. Launch: 506 days of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A community token whose value comes from attention rather than a product. Being a meme is not a risk in itself: it is scored on exactly the same contract and market facts as any other token. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: CoinGecko category: Meme. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $82K of DEX liquidity across 11 pools. Launch: 506 days of market history.

Fix

Expect attention-driven volatility; the facts in this report say whether the contract itself can be used against holders.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 25
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The Bulla contract is a standard ERC-20 token implementation. It follows the OpenZeppelin standard library and contains no custom logic, privileged roles, or administrative backdoors. The contract is immutable and functions as a simple value transfer asset.

Technical10/10Low risk

The architecture follows the standard ERC-20 implementation (7.1 Architecture). Code security is high due to the use of audited library primitives (7.2 Code Security). There are no access control mechanisms or external dependencies that introduce risk (7.3 Access Control, 7.6 External).

Governance7/10Low risk

There are no economic parameters or governance mechanisms present in the contract (7.4 Economic, 7.5 Governance). The token supply is fixed upon deployment. Operations are limited to standard token transfers (7.8 Operations).

Upgrades9/10Low risk

The contract is not a proxy and does not support upgradeability (7.7 Upgrades). The logic is immutable and cannot be altered post-deployment.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

The contract is secure for standard ERC-20 operations. No further action is required as the code is a standard implementation without complex logic or administrative risks.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypeToken
NetworkBNB Chain
Token age1y
Contract0x595e…3511
Deployer0x0dab…1b90
Badge for your website
BULLA security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Oct 25, 202621Low

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the BULLA contract address?

The BULLA contract on BNB Chain is 0x595e21b20e78674f8a64c1566a20b2b316bc3511. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.

Is BULLA a scam?

Quantum Audit's risk score for BULLA is 21/100 (Low risk) as of Oct 25, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Mint: No mint; Liquidity lock: Not locked; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.

Is BULLA liquidity locked?

Liquidity lock: Not locked (as of Oct 25, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $82.5K.

Who holds BULLA?

As of Oct 25, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 57.2% of the supply across 60,552 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of BULLA?

Our AI-powered scanner gives you a deeper, real-time smart contract analysis — free, with every scoring factor shown.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page