Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Honeypot, rug-pull and ownership checks

Is Basepepe a Scam?

BASEPEPEBase
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Sep 4, 2026 · 1 audit on record
SummaryAI Copilot

This audit was conducted without access to the contract's source code.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Ownership status UNKNOWN
  • Mint capability UNKNOWN
  • Liquidity not locked, but no owner/deployer address holds LP — market-depth risk, not rug risk
  • Liquidity < $50k
  • LP top1 unlocked holder = 98.2%
  • LP top3 unlocked holders = 100.0%
  • Token age < 30 days
Exact factors
  • Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
  • Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
  • Liquidity not locked, but no owner/deployer address holds LP — market-depth risk, not rug risk
  • Liquidity < $50k ($44,294 across 5 pairs — thin market)
  • LP top1 unlocked holder = 98.2% (independent LP — depth risk, pool = 99% of DEX liquidity)
  • LP top3 unlocked holders = 100.0% (independent LP — depth risk, pool = 99% of DEX liquidity)
  • Token age < 30 days (still settling)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Our automated scanner reviewed Basepepe (BASEPEPE) on Base. 4 of 7 security checks passed — see the full breakdown below.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Sep 44 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipUnknown
MintUnknown
Liquidity lockNot locked
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Sep 4, 2026
20.7%Contracts11.3%Wallets68.0%Everyone else
20.7%Contracts11.3%68.0%Everyone else
ContractsWalletsEveryone elseBubble area = share of supply
32.0%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking20.7%
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell11.3%
  • Everyone elsethe rest of the supply68.0%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads19.6%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Sep 4, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Sep 4$44.3K across 5 pairs
LP tokensNot locked

The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.

Analysed pool$44.0KShare of depth99.2%
Top-1 Unlocked Holder98.2%
Top-3 Unlocked100.0%
Unlocked LP held by
0x0121…75c90x87d8…d0db

No privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.

Security Findings

3 Info
Info

Unverified Source Code

The source code for the contract at 0xb200…ff01 is not verified on the block explorer. This lack of transparency prevents users and auditors from understanding the contract's functionality, logic, and potential vulnerabilities. It significantly increases the risk of hidden malicious code or unintended behavior.I-01

Issue

The source code for the contract at is not verified on the block explorer. This lack of transparency prevents users and auditors from understanding the contract's functionality, logic, and potential vulnerabilities. It significantly increases the risk of hidden malicious code or unintended behavior.

Fix

Verify the contract's source code on the block explorer. This allows for public scrutiny and independent security analysis, building trust within the community. Ensure the verified code precisely matches the deployed bytecode.

Status

Unresolved

Info

Unknown Contract Functionality and Risks

Without access to the source code, the specific functionality, purpose, and internal mechanisms of the contract are unknown. This makes it impossible to assess common security risks such as reentrancy, access control flaws, integer overflows/underflows, or economic manipulation vectors (7.2 Code Security, 7.3 Access Control, 7.4 Economic). Users interact with this contract at a heightened risk.I-02

Issue

Without access to the source code, the specific functionality, purpose, and internal mechanisms of the contract are unknown. This makes it impossible to assess common security risks such as reentrancy, access control flaws, integer overflows/underflows, or economic manipulation vectors (7.2 Code Security, 7.3 Access Control, 7.4 Economic). Users interact with this contract at a heightened risk.

Fix

Provide comprehensive documentation and, ideally, verified source code to explain the contract's intended functionality, design choices, and any known limitations or risks. This transparency is crucial for informed decision-making by users.

Status

Unresolved

Info

Immutability of Unverified Code

The contract is not identified as a proxy, implying it is immutable once deployed. While immutability can be a security feature for well-audited code, for an unverified contract, it means any potential vulnerabilities or bugs present in the bytecode cannot be patched or upgraded (7.7 Upgrades). This locks in any undiscovered flaws, making them permanent and unfixable without a complete redeployment to a new address.I-03

Issue

The contract is not identified as a proxy, implying it is immutable once deployed. While immutability can be a security feature for well-audited code, for an unverified contract, it means any potential vulnerabilities or bugs present in the bytecode cannot be patched or upgraded (7.7 Upgrades). This locks in any undiscovered flaws, making them permanent and unfixable without a complete redeployment to a new address.

Fix

If the contract is intended to be immutable, ensure its source code is rigorously audited and verified before deployment. For unverified immutable contracts, users should be aware that any issues found later cannot be remediated.

Status

Unresolved

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Sep 4
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

This audit was conducted without access to the contract's source code. Therefore, a comprehensive security analysis for vulnerabilities such as reentrancy, access control, or economic exploits could not be performed. The findings are limited to observations based on the provided metadata, primarily highlighting the risks associated with interacting with an unverified contract.

Technical8/10Low risk

Without access to the contract's source code, a detailed technical analysis (7.1 Architecture, 7.2 Code Security, 7.3 Access Control) is not possible. The contract's functionality and internal logic remain unknown, preventing assessment of common vulnerabilities like reentrancy or integer overflows. This significantly limits the ability to identify specific code-level security strengths or weaknesses, such as proper input validation or secure access control mechanisms.

Governance2/10High risk

A thorough assessment of economic and governance risks (7.4 Economic, 7.5 Governance) is not feasible without understanding the contract's logic and its interaction with other protocols or assets. Potential issues like oracle manipulation, economic exploits, or centralized control cannot be identified. The lack of transparency prevents evaluating the contract's resilience to market fluctuations or potential governance attacks.

Upgrades6/10Medium risk

The contract is not identified as a proxy (is_proxy: false), suggesting it is immutable and not directly upgradeable (7.7 Upgrades). While this eliminates upgrade-related risks like improper upgrade logic or proxy storage collisions, it also means any discovered vulnerabilities cannot be patched without a full redeployment. The immutability implies a fixed design, which can be a strength if the code is secure, but a weakness if critical flaws are present.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

It is strongly recommended that users exercise extreme caution when interacting with unverified contracts.

Always prioritize contracts with publicly available and audited source code to ensure transparency and accountability. For developers, ensure all deployed contracts have their source code verified on block explorers to provide transparency and enable community scrutiny, which is crucial for building trust and enhancing security.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
Type-
NetworkBase
Token age19d
Contract0xb200…ff01
Badge for your website
Basepepe security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Sep 4, 202635Medium
  2. Sep 4, 202629Low

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the BASEPEPE contract address?

The Basepepe contract on Base is 0xb2000000000000000000002ca4af341e1af6ff01. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.

Is Basepepe a scam?

Quantum Audit's risk score for Basepepe is 35/100 (Medium risk) as of Sep 4, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Liquidity lock: Not locked; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.

Is BASEPEPE liquidity locked?

Liquidity lock: Not locked (as of Sep 4, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $44.3K.

Who holds BASEPEPE?

As of Sep 4, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 32.0% of the supply. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Basepepe?

Paste the contract address into our AI-powered scanner for a deeper real-time report — free, with every scoring factor shown.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page