Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
BNB ChainThe contract at the provided address is not verified on the BSC block explorer.
Read the full analysisEach factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 21, 2026
The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are locked or burned.
The contract source code is not published on the block explorer, preventing any security review of the logic.
Verify the contract source code on the block explorer to allow for community and security analysis.
Unresolved
The contract is owned by an EOA (0x34f0...), which grants the owner full control over administrative functions without time-locks or multi-sig protection.
Transfer ownership to a multi-signature wallet or a DAO-governed contract to mitigate single-point-of-failure risks.
Unresolved
The absence of verified code and project documentation creates an information asymmetry that poses significant risks to token holders.
Provide comprehensive documentation and verify all deployed contracts to establish trust with the community.
Unresolved
The ten largest holders own 80.4% of supply. Of that, 6.3% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 74.1% in wallets, 0.0% in other contracts. 1,395 holders in total.
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Acknowledged
1,395 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Acknowledged
100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is locked in PinkLock02 until 31 Oct 2027 (374 days). Until then nobody — the project included — can withdraw it unless the locker contract itself is flawed; after that date the lock's owner can.
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Acknowledged
Liquidity $2.3M (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $274.1M (DexScreener, all pools).
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Acknowledged
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: a single wallet (EOA). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $2.3M of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Acknowledged
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Acknowledged
The contract at the provided address is not verified on the BSC block explorer. Consequently, the source code is unavailable for security analysis. The project exhibits high risk due to lack of transparency, centralized ownership by an EOA, and the inability to verify internal logic or tax mechanisms.
7.1 Architecture: Unknown. 7.2 Code Security: Unverifiable due to lack of source code. 7.3 Access Control: Centralized control via EOA. 7.6 External: Unknown dependency risks.
7.4 Economic: High risk of rug-pull or hidden tax mechanisms. 7.5 Governance: Fully centralized under an EOA. 7.8 Operations: Lack of transparency regarding project management.
7.7 Upgrades: Contract is not identified as a proxy, but logic cannot be confirmed. No upgradeability features can be verified.
Do not interact with this contract. Without verified source code, it is impossible to determine if the contract contains malicious functions such as honeypot mechanisms, blacklists, or unauthorized minting capabilities.
Investors should prioritize projects with verified source code and audited smart contracts.
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page
