The contract at the provided address is not verified on the block explorer. Consequently, the source code is inaccessible for security analysis. The contract is controlled by an EOA (Externally Owned Account), and ownership has not been renounced, posing significant centralization risks to token holders.
Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is Axis Robotics a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The contract at the provided address is not verified on the block explorer.
Read the full analysis- Mint capability UNKNOWN
- Volume/Liquidity > 15×
- Top-10 concentration > 70%
- Contract source not verified — its logic cannot be read
Exact factors
- Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
- Volume/Liquidity > 15× (128.8× — wash-trading signal)
- Top-10 concentration > 70% (80.4% total → 73.1% effective; 73.1% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts; 7.3% burned, locked or in pools excluded)
- Contract source NOT verified — its logic cannot be read
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Oct 21Holders
as of audit · Oct 21, 2026- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell73.1%
- DEX poolsthe pools' own liquidity7.3%
- Everyone else1,379 holders19.6%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 21, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Oct 21The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are locked or burned.
Security Findings
CriticalUnverified Source Code
The contract source code is not published on the block explorer, making it impossible to audit for security vulnerabilities or malicious logic.C-01
Issue
The contract source code is not published on the block explorer, making it impossible to audit for security vulnerabilities or malicious logic.
Fix
Publish and verify the source code on the block explorer to allow for community and security review.
Status
Unresolved
HighCentralized Ownership
The contract is controlled by an EOA, which allows the owner to potentially modify critical parameters or restrict user access without notice.H-01
Issue
The contract is controlled by an EOA, which allows the owner to potentially modify critical parameters or restrict user access without notice.
Fix
Renounce ownership or transfer control to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract.
Status
Unresolved
MediumLack of Transparency
The absence of verified code prevents users from understanding the tokenomics, tax structures, or transfer restrictions implemented in the contract.M-01
Issue
The absence of verified code prevents users from understanding the tokenomics, tax structures, or transfer restrictions implemented in the contract.
Fix
Provide a clear, documented whitepaper and verify the contract code to build trust with the community.
Status
Unresolved
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 80.4% of supply. Of that, 7.3% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 73.1% in wallets, 0.0% in other contracts. 1,389 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 80.4% of supply. Of that, 7.3% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 73.1% in wallets, 0.0% in other contracts. 1,389 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
1,389 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
1,389 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoLiquidity time-locked
100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is locked in PinkLock02 until 31 Oct 2027 (375 days). Until then nobody — the project included — can withdraw it unless the locker contract itself is flawed; after that date the lock's owner can.QA-LIQUIDITY
Issue
100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is locked in PinkLock02 until 31 Oct 2027 (375 days). Until then nobody — the project included — can withdraw it unless the locker contract itself is flawed; after that date the lock's owner can.
Fix
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $2.2M (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $279.5M (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $2.2M (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $279.5M (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: a single wallet (EOA). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $2.2M of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: a single wallet (EOA). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $2.2M of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 217.1 Architecture: Unknown; 7.2 Code Security: Unverifiable; 7.3 Access Control: Centralized EOA; 7.6 External: Unknown. The lack of source code verification prevents any assessment of logic, reentrancy protections, or standard compliance. Users must assume the contract could contain malicious functions such as blacklisting or arbitrary minting.
7.4 Economic: High risk due to lack of transparency in tokenomics; 7.5 Governance: Fully centralized under an EOA. The owner has unilateral control over the contract, which could lead to rug-pull scenarios or tax modifications. No decentralized governance mechanisms are visible.
7.7 Upgrades: Unknown; 7.8 Operations: High risk. While the contract does not appear to be a standard proxy, the lack of verification means hidden upgradeability or logic-swapping mechanisms cannot be ruled out. The EOA owner represents a single point of failure for all operational parameters.
Do not interact with this contract. Without verified source code, it is impossible to determine if the contract contains backdoors, malicious tax logic, or minting vulnerabilities.
Investors should prioritize projects with verified, audited, and transparent source code.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Oct 21, 202677High
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the AXIS contract address?
The Axis Robotics (AXIS) contract on BNB Chain is 0xb3a30fbaecc17da5711d6dfcdc04280dbb967777. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.
Is Axis Robotics a scam?
Quantum Audit's risk score for Axis Robotics is 77/100 (High risk) as of Oct 21, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Not verified; Ownership: Retained; Liquidity lock: Locked; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.
Is AXIS liquidity locked?
Liquidity lock: Locked (as of Oct 21, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $2.17M.
Who holds AXIS?
As of Oct 21, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 80.4% of the supply across 1,389 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Axis Robotics?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page