The AxisToken implementation contract deployed behind a UUPS ERC1967 proxy on Base was evaluated. The codebase adheres closely to standard OpenZeppelin upgradeable contracts, implementing ERC-20, ERC-20 Permit, and UUPS interfaces. Ownership of the privileged functions is held by a timelock contract with a 48-hour delay, significantly mitigating operational and administrative abuse risks.
Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is Axis Robotics a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The AxisToken implementation contract deployed behind a UUPS ERC1967 proxy on Base was evaluated.
Read the full analysis- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
- Upgradeable proxy — the admin can replace the logic
- Liquidity not locked
- Top-10 concentration > 30%
Exact factors
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
- Upgradeable proxy — the admin can replace the logic
- Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool; this pool is 72% of DEX liquidity) — held by independent providers — market-depth risk
- Top-10 concentration > 30% (97.8% total → 42.4% effective; 5.4% in EOAs, 92.4% in contracts)
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Oct 21Holders
as of audit · Oct 21, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking92.4%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell5.4%
- Everyone else10,640 holders2.2%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 21, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Oct 21- Uniswap v4USDCAnalysed$2.47M72.4%
- Uniswap v3USDC$120.9K3.5%
- Uniswap v4USDC$70.0K2.1%
- Uniswap v4USDC$51.0K1.5%
- Uniswap v4USDC$49.8K1.5%
- Uniswap v4USDC$47.6K1.4%
Show 4 more pairs
The 20 remaining pairs hold $453.5K between them and are not listed. The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.
0xa0bf…0efb0x0565…df380x4c17…f7480x146e…00310x5d04…88ff0x8fa8…af6f0x9cdb…6de20xe41e…04190xa92a…4ab80x21c6…a0b6No privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.
Security Findings
MediumLiquidity not locked
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 94.7% is held, unlocked, by 10 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. No single one holds a majority: their exits thin the market rather than hand anyone the pool. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them. This assessment covers the main pool, which holds 72% of the token's DEX liquidity; the other pools were not assessed.QA-LIQUIDITY
Issue
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 94.7% is held, unlocked, by 10 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. No single one holds a majority: their exits thin the market rather than hand anyone the pool. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them. This assessment covers the main pool, which holds 72% of the token's DEX liquidity; the other pools were not assessed.
Fix
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Status
Acknowledged
MediumWhat the token's controller can do
The contract lets its controller — a timelock with a 48h delay — mint new supply. Nothing independent vouches for whoever holds them, so each is a live risk to holders.QA-POWERS
Issue
The contract lets its controller — a timelock with a 48h delay — mint new supply. Nothing independent vouches for whoever holds them, so each is a live risk to holders.
Fix
Check who holds these powers and whether a timelock or multisig stands between them and holders.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNo issues identified in the reviewed source
The verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint/owner authority, mint capability, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.I-01
Issue
The verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint/owner authority, mint capability, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.
Fix
Re-check after any contract upgrade or ownership change, both of which can alter behaviour without changing this page.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 97.8% of supply. What remains: 5.4% in wallets, 92.4% in other contracts. 10,650 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 97.8% of supply. What remains: 5.4% in wallets, 92.4% in other contracts. 10,650 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoIdentity verified by independent sources
Listed on CoinGecko as Axis Robotics (AXIS). Traded on Coinbase. 10,650 holders. Verified by: exchange listings.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
Listed on CoinGecko as Axis Robotics (AXIS). Traded on Coinbase. 10,650 holders. Verified by: exchange listings.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $3.4M (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $30.9M (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $3.4M (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $30.9M (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a timelock with a 48h delay. Code: upgradeable proxy. Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $3.4M of DEX liquidity across 30 pools. Launch: 2 days of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a timelock with a 48h delay. Code: upgradeable proxy. Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $3.4M of DEX liquidity across 30 pools. Launch: 2 days of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — 2 days of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is 2 days old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is 2 days old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 21Regarding 7.1 Architecture and 7.2 Code Security, the contract relies on standard OpenZeppelin library patterns for ERC-20 and ERC-20 Permit logic with clean modularity. Standard transfers and signature permits execute without custom fee overhead or reentrancy exposure, satisfying 7.6 External integration requirements. However, the mint function allows dynamic supply expansion without hard limits or programmatic caps, which introduces a structural inflation vulnerability if unauthorized access were ever achieved.
Under 7.3 Access Control and 7.5 Governance, the contract assigns administrative powers to a Timelock controller with a 172,800-second (48-hour) minimum execution delay, preventing instantaneous rug pulls or unexpected privilege actions. Regarding 7.4 Economic considerations, the owner maintains unrestricted minting authority via mint(address,uint256), meaning the circulating supply and token valuation are tied directly to timelock governance decisions rather than immutable tokenomics.
For 7.7 Upgrades, the implementation utilizes the standard UUPS proxy pattern (IERC1822Proxiable/UUPSUpgradeable), ensuring upgrade logic is contained within the implementation and protected by access modifiers. Under 7.8 Operations, upgrade authorizations are constrained by the 48-hour timelock, allowing token holders ample window to react to proposed logic shifts. Nevertheless, proxy upgrade mechanisms inherently present risk if an invalid or malicious implementation address is scheduled and executed.
Maintain the current timelock configuration of 48 hours for any administration and upgrade execution to preserve user trust and verification windows.
Consider establishing an absolute programmatic cap on total supply within the implementation contract or enforcing event notifications on pending minting proposals to ensure complete economic predictability.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Oct 21, 202636Medium
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the AXIS contract address?
The Axis Robotics (AXIS) contract on Base is 0x5be75e3b0aff5d1a042a5363ae36acb1d6d755ea. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.
Is Axis Robotics a scam?
Quantum Audit's risk score for Axis Robotics is 36/100 (Medium risk) as of Oct 21, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Ownership: Retained; Mint: Mintable; Liquidity lock: Not locked; Upgradeability: Upgradeable; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.
Is AXIS liquidity locked?
Liquidity lock: Not locked (as of Oct 21, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $3.41M.
Who holds AXIS?
As of Oct 21, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 97.8% of the supply across 10,650 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Axis Robotics?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page