Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is Anakin Coin a Scam?

ANAKINEthereum
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Nov 3, 2026 · 1 audit on recordNew Launch · 20h old
Chart
Medium RiskHow is this score calculated?
How the score breaks downratings: 10 is safest
Technical8/10Governance8/10Upgrades8/10Checks passed6 of 7Findings1 High · 1 Medium · 6 Info8
SummaryAI Copilot

The ANAKIN token is a standard ERC-20 implementation. The audit identified critical issues regarding return value consistency and insecure authorization patterns that could lead to integration failures or unauthorized rule bypasses.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Liquidity < $50k
  • Top-10 concentration > 20%
  • Code: Inconsistent Return Values in Transfer Functions
  • Code: Insecure Authorization via tx.origin
Exact factors
  • Liquidity < $50k ($12,071 across 1 pairs — thin market)
  • Top-10 concentration > 20% (45.2% total → 20.5% effective; 7.1% in EOAs, 33.4% in contracts; 4.7% burned, locked or in pools excluded)
  • Code: Inconsistent Return Values in Transfer Functions (High, static analysis)
  • Code: Insecure Authorization via tx.origin (Medium, static analysis)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (20h old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Nov 36 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipUnknown
MintNo mint
Liquidity lockLocked
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Nov 3, 2026211 holders
33.4%Contracts7.1%Wallets4.7%54.8%Everyone else
33.4%Contracts7.1%4.7%54.8%Everyone else
ContractsWalletsBurnedEveryone elseBubble area = share of supply
45.2%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking33.4%
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell7.1%
  • Burnedout of circulation4.7%
  • Everyone else201 holders54.8%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads20.5%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Nov 3, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Nov 3$12.1K

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensLocked

The LP tokens of the analysed pool are locked or burned.

Analysed pool$12.1KShare of depth100.0%
LP Burned100.0% · ≈ permanent lock
LP Locked100.0% · Dead Address

Security Findings

1 High1 Medium6 Info
High

Inconsistent Return Values in Transfer Functions

The _transfer function and associated transfer/transferFrom methods fail to handle return values correctly, which can cause external protocols to incorrectly assume a transaction failed or succeeded.CD-01

Issue

The _transfer function and associated transfer/transferFrom methods fail to handle return values correctly, which can cause external protocols to incorrectly assume a transaction failed or succeeded.

Fix

Ensure all transfer functions strictly adhere to the ERC-20 specification by returning a boolean value that accurately reflects the success of the operation.

Status

Unresolved

Medium

Insecure Authorization via tx.origin

The returnTx function uses tx.origin to determine authorization. This is dangerous because a malicious contract can be used to trick the protocol into executing functions on behalf of the original user.CD-02

Issue

The returnTx function uses tx.origin to determine authorization. This is dangerous because a malicious contract can be used to trick the protocol into executing functions on behalf of the original user.

Fix

Replace all instances of tx.origin with msg.sender to ensure that only the direct caller is authorized to perform sensitive actions.

Status

Unresolved

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 45.2% of supply. Of that, 4.7% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 7.1% in wallets, 33.4% in other contracts. 211 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 45.2% of supply. Of that, 4.7% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 7.1% in wallets, 33.4% in other contracts. 211 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Not listed by any independent source

211 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

211 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Liquidity burned — cannot be withdrawn

100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY

Issue

100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.

Fix

Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $12K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $38K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $12K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $38K (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $12K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $12K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.

Fix

Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Recently launched — less than a day of market history

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT

Issue

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.

Fix

Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Nov 3
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The ANAKIN token is a standard ERC-20 implementation. The audit identified critical issues regarding return value consistency and insecure authorization patterns that could lead to integration failures or unauthorized rule bypasses. 7.1 Architecture: Standard ERC-20. 7.2 Code Security: High risk due to return value mismatches. 7.3 Access Control: Medium risk due to tx.origin usage. 7.4 Economic: Low. 7.5 Governance: N/A. 7.6 External: Low. 7.7 Upgrades: N/A. 7.8 Operations: Low.

Technical8/10Low risk

The contract follows standard ERC-20 patterns but fails to implement return values correctly in internal transfer logic. The use of tx.origin for authorization in the returnTx function introduces a significant security flaw. The codebase is simple and lacks complex dependencies, which limits the attack surface.

Governance8/10Low risk

There are no complex economic mechanisms or governance structures present. The token operates as a simple utility asset. No inflationary or deflationary mechanics were identified.

Upgrades8/10Low risk

The contract is not upgradeable and does not utilize proxy patterns. The state is immutable post-deployment. No upgrade-related risks exist.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

Immediate remediation of the return value logic is required to ensure compatibility with standard DeFi protocols and aggregators.

The use of tx.origin must be replaced with msg.sender to prevent potential cross-contract impersonation attacks.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypeToken
NetworkEthereum
Token age20h
Contract0x29da…a297
Deployer0x8b24…edbb
Badge for your website
Anakin Coin security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Nov 3, 202648Medium

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Related Audits

6 more on the recordAll audits
CoW Protocol TokenCOW · Ethereum48MediumCovalent X TokenCXT · Ethereum47MediumStargate FinanceSTG · Ethereum49MediumMorphoEthereum46MediumPortalEthereum50MediumMOMOEthereum45Medium

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Anakin Coin?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified