Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
BNB ChainThe LaunchToken is a standard ERC-20 implementation deployed as an EIP-1167 minimal clone.
Read the full analysisEach factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Nov 2, 2026
The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are locked or burned.
0x0ed9…9706No privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.
The minter role has the authority to mint new tokens, which can dilute the value of existing holdings. This function is restricted to a privileged address.
Restrict minting to a capped amount or transition the minter role to a DAO-controlled contract.
Unresolved
The minter can call disableBlocks to toggle a switch that prevents all token transfers. This effectively allows the controller to freeze the entire market for this token.
Remove the ability to disable global transfers or implement a community-voted mechanism for such actions.
Unresolved
The minter can use setPoolBlocked to prevent specific addresses from transferring tokens. This allows the controller to censor individual users or liquidity pools.
Limit the use of blacklisting to specific regulatory compliance scenarios and ensure the process is transparent.
Unresolved
The ten largest holders own 83.3% of supply. Of that, 17.8% burned, 54.2% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 8.5% in wallets, 2.7% in other contracts. 432 holders in total.
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Acknowledged
432 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Acknowledged
99.9% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 99.9% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone. 0.1% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. No single one holds a majority: their exits thin the market rather than hand anyone the pool.
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Acknowledged
Liquidity $24K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $215K (DexScreener, all pools).
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Acknowledged
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: minter — a contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: 2% on buy, 2% on sell. Market: $24K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: 1 days of market history.
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Acknowledged
The token's oldest DEX pool is 1 day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Acknowledged
The LaunchToken is a standard ERC-20 implementation deployed as an EIP-1167 minimal clone. The contract includes centralized administrative controls that allow the minter to mint tokens, block addresses, and toggle transfer restrictions. While the code follows standard patterns, the high degree of centralization poses a significant risk to token holders.
The contract utilizes a clean, standard ERC-20 implementation with 7.1 Architecture following the EIP-1167 clone pattern. 7.2 Code Security is maintained through the use of OpenZeppelin-style libraries and 7.3 Access Control is strictly enforced via the onlyMinter modifier. 7.6 External interactions are minimal, reducing the attack surface for reentrancy or flash loan exploits.
The protocol exhibits high 7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance risks due to the concentration of power in the minter role. The minter can arbitrarily dilute supply via minting and restrict liquidity by blocking addresses or disabling transfers. These mechanisms allow the controller to unilaterally alter the token's economic utility.
The contract is deployed as an EIP-1167 minimal clone, which is immutable by design. 7.7 Upgrades are not possible, ensuring the logic remains fixed. 7.8 Operations are stable as the implementation cannot be swapped or modified post-deployment.
The protocol should transition administrative powers to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract to mitigate single-point-of-failure risks.
Implementing a timelock on privileged functions would provide transparency and protection for token holders against sudden administrative actions.
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified
