Quantum Audit Logo

Is Adapt a Scam?

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Adapt ADAP
0x91c9…de33
Arbitrum Not verifiedLast checked 2d ago 1 audit on record New Launch · 23h old
DexScreener ↗
How is this score calculated? → Critical Risk
Executive SummaryAI Copilot

This audit report addresses a contract deployed on Arbitrum at 0x91c95440403263f60f71a2cdc8d1a824b6fbde33. Crucially, no source code was provided for analysis, rendering a comprehensive security assessment impossible. The lack of verified source code introduces significant and unquantifiable risks across all security domains, making any interaction with this contract highly speculative and dangerous. Users are strongly advised against interacting with unverified contracts.

5 High1 Low
! Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (23h old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.
Volume 24h
$159.3K
Liquidity
$66.5K
Price
$0.09121
Token Age
23h
Top 10 Holders
93.6%

Security Findings

5 High1 Low
High

Lack of Verified Source Code

H-01The contract at 0x91c9…de33 does not have its source code verified on the block explorer. This prevents any form of security analysis, including architectural review (7.1 Architecture) and code security assessment (7.2 Code Security). Users are unable to confirm the contract's intended functionality or identify potential vulnerabilities.
IssueThe contract at does not have its source code verified on the block explorer. This prevents any form of security analysis, including architectural review (7.1 Architecture) and code security assessment (7.2 Code Security). Users are unable to confirm the contract's intended functionality or identify potential vulnerabilities.
FixThe contract deployer should immediately verify the full source code on the block explorer. This is a critical step for transparency, user trust, and enabling any form of security review.
StatusUnresolved
High

Unknown Contract Functionality and Security Posture

H-02Due to the absence of verified source code, the actual functionality, business logic, and security posture of the contract remain entirely unknown. It is impossible to determine if the contract contains common vulnerabilities such as reentrancy, integer overflows/underflows, or other critical flaws (7.2 Code Security).
IssueDue to the absence of verified source code, the actual functionality, business logic, and security posture of the contract remain entirely unknown. It is impossible to determine if the contract contains common vulnerabilities such as reentrancy, integer overflows/underflows, or other critical flaws (7.2 Code Security).
FixWithout verified source code, users should assume the contract's functionality is arbitrary and potentially malicious. Avoid any interaction with this contract until its source code is verified and thoroughly reviewed.
StatusUnresolved
High

Undeterminable Access Control Mechanisms

H-03The access control mechanisms (7.3 Access Control) of the contract cannot be assessed without source code. It is unknown who has privileged access, what actions they can perform, and if these privileges are appropriately restricted. This could lead to unauthorized control over funds or critical contract functions.
IssueThe access control mechanisms (7.3 Access Control) of the contract cannot be assessed without source code. It is unknown who has privileged access, what actions they can perform, and if these privileges are appropriately restricted. This could lead to unauthorized control over funds or critical contract functions.
FixVerify source code to allow for a proper assessment of access control. Implement robust, role-based access control with multi-signature requirements for critical operations.
StatusUnresolved
High

Undeterminable Upgradeability and Immutability

H-04The upgradeability status (7.7 Upgrades) of the contract is unknown. It cannot be determined if the contract is immutable or if it implements an upgrade pattern (e.g., proxy). If upgradeable, the mechanism and control over upgrades are opaque, posing a high risk of malicious changes to the contract's logic post-deployment.
IssueThe upgradeability status (7.7 Upgrades) of the contract is unknown. It cannot be determined if the contract is immutable or if it implements an upgrade pattern (e.g., proxy). If upgradeable, the mechanism and control over upgrades are opaque, posing a high risk of malicious changes to the contract's logic post-deployment.
FixIf the contract is intended to be upgradeable, verify the source code to confirm the upgrade pattern and ensure upgradeability is controlled by a secure, multi-signature governance mechanism. If immutable, this should be verifiable from the source.
StatusUnresolved
High

Unassessable Economic and Governance Models

H-05The economic model (7.4 Economic) and governance structure (7.5 Governance) of the contract cannot be evaluated. This prevents analysis of potential economic exploits, such as oracle manipulation, flash loan vulnerabilities, or centralized control over critical parameters. The contract's interaction with external protocols (7.6 External) is also unknown.
IssueThe economic model (7.4 Economic) and governance structure (7.5 Governance) of the contract cannot be evaluated. This prevents analysis of potential economic exploits, such as oracle manipulation, flash loan vulnerabilities, or centralized control over critical parameters. The contract's interaction with external protocols (7.6 External) is also unknown.
FixProvide verified source code and comprehensive documentation detailing the economic model, governance structure, and any external dependencies. This is crucial for users to understand the financial risks and control mechanisms.
StatusUnresolved
Low

Absence of Public Audit Report

L-01There is no publicly available security audit report for this contract. While not a direct vulnerability, the absence of an independent security review increases the overall risk profile, especially given the lack of verified source code.
IssueThere is no publicly available security audit report for this contract. While not a direct vulnerability, the absence of an independent security review increases the overall risk profile, especially given the lack of verified source code.
FixOnce source code is verified, engage reputable security auditors to conduct a thorough audit. Publish the audit report transparently for community review.
StatusUnresolved

Category Ratings

TechnicalHigh1/10

Without verified source code, a comprehensive technical security assessment (7.1 Architecture, 7.2 Code Security) is impossible. The contract's architecture, logic, and potential vulnerabilities like reentrancy, integer overflows, or access control flaws cannot be analyzed. This fundamental lack of transparency introduces significant technical risk, as the deployed bytecode's functionality remains entirely unknown and unauditable. No technical strengths can be identified without code.

GovernanceHigh1/10

The economic model (7.4 Economic) and governance mechanisms (7.5 Governance) of this contract cannot be determined without source code. This prevents any analysis of potential economic exploits, such as oracle manipulation, flash loan attacks, or unfair distribution of value. The absence of transparency makes it impossible to assess the contract's financial stability, its reliance on external protocols (7.6 External), or the control structures in place (7.3 Access Control).

UpgradesMedium4/10

The upgradeability status (7.7 Upgrades) of this contract is unknown without source code. It is impossible to determine if the contract is a proxy, if it uses a specific upgrade pattern (e.g., UUPS, Transparent), or if it is immutable. This lack of information poses a high risk, as malicious upgrade capabilities could be present, allowing for arbitrary changes to contract logic, potentially leading to asset loss or system compromise. No upgrade safety can be confirmed.

Security Checklist

2/5 checks passed
Contract VerifiedFail
Ownership Renounced?
No Mint Function?
Liquidity LockedPass
Not a ProxyPass

Holder Composition

93.6% in top 10
93.6% in wallets0.0% in contracts
Effective Concentration93.6%

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Liquidity Depth

$66.5K

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

LP Distribution

Top-1 Unlocked Holder100.0%
Top-3 Unlocked100.0%

Key Addresses

2 addresses
Deployer
0xe7ed…3293
Unlocked LP Held By
0x1d2a…158c

No privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.

What Raised This Score

10 factors
  • Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
  • Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
  • Contract source NOT verified
  • Top-10 concentration > 70% (93.6% total → 93.6% effective; 93.6% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts — extreme)
  • LP top1 unlocked holder = 100.0% (independent LP — depth risk)
  • LP top3 unlocked holders = 100.0% (independent LP — depth risk)
  • LP claimed locked but only 0.0% actually locked
  • Token age < 24h (brand new — bot activity, unproven)
  • 5 High finding(s) from audit
  • 1 Low finding(s) from audit

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Related Audits

6 more on the record
TermiX (TMX)Critical RiskAxelar Wrapped LAVA (LAVA)Critical RiskVangrid (VAN)Critical RiskMORCritical RiskDGrid AI (DGAI)Critical RiskUnicity Labs (UNYLA)Critical Risk

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Adapt?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit