Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is Adapt a Scam?

ADAPArbitrum
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Sep 4, 2026 · 1 audit on recordNew Launch · 23h old
Chart
Critical RiskHow is this score calculated?
How the score breaks downratings: 10 is safest
Technical1/10Governance1/10Upgrades4/10Checks passed2 of 5Findings5 High · 1 Low6
SummaryAI Copilot

This audit report addresses a contract deployed on Arbitrum at 0x91c95440403263f60f71a2cdc8d1a824b6fbde33. Crucially, no source code was provided for analysis, rendering a comprehensive security assessment impossible.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Ownership status UNKNOWN
  • Mint capability UNKNOWN
  • Contract source not verified
  • Top-10 concentration > 70%
  • LP top1 unlocked holder = 100.0%
  • LP top3 unlocked holders = 100.0%
  • LP claimed locked but only 0.0% actually locked
  • Token age < 24h
  • 5 High finding(s) from audit
  • 1 Low finding(s) from audit
Exact factors
  • Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
  • Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
  • Contract source NOT verified
  • Top-10 concentration > 70% (93.6% total → 93.6% effective; 93.6% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts — extreme)
  • LP top1 unlocked holder = 100.0% (independent LP — depth risk)
  • LP top3 unlocked holders = 100.0% (independent LP — depth risk)
  • LP claimed locked but only 0.0% actually locked
  • Token age < 24h (brand new — bot activity, unproven)
  • 5 High finding(s) from audit
  • 1 Low finding(s) from audit

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (23h old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Sep 42 of 5 checks passed
Contract verifiedNot verified
OwnershipUnknown
MintUnknown
Liquidity lockLocked
UpgradeabilityFixed code

Holders

as of audit · Sep 4, 2026
93.6%Wallets6.4%
93.6%Wallets6.4%
WalletsEveryone elseBubble area = share of supply
93.6%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell93.6%
  • Everyone elsethe rest of the supply6.4%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads93.6%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Sep 4, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Sep 4$66.5K

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensLocked

The LP tokens of the analysed pool are locked or burned.

Analysed pool$66.5KShare of depth100.0%
Top-1 Unlocked Holder100.0%
Top-3 Unlocked100.0%
Unlocked LP held by
0x1d2a…158c

No privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.

Security Findings

5 High1 Low
High

Lack of Verified Source Code

The contract at 0x91c9…de33 does not have its source code verified on the block explorer. This prevents any form of security analysis, including architectural review (7.1 Architecture) and code security assessment (7.2 Code Security). Users are unable to confirm the contract's intended functionality or identify potential vulnerabilities.H-01

Issue

The contract at does not have its source code verified on the block explorer. This prevents any form of security analysis, including architectural review (7.1 Architecture) and code security assessment (7.2 Code Security). Users are unable to confirm the contract's intended functionality or identify potential vulnerabilities.

Fix

The contract deployer should immediately verify the full source code on the block explorer. This is a critical step for transparency, user trust, and enabling any form of security review.

Status

Unresolved

High

Unknown Contract Functionality and Security Posture

Due to the absence of verified source code, the actual functionality, business logic, and security posture of the contract remain entirely unknown. It is impossible to determine if the contract contains common vulnerabilities such as reentrancy, integer overflows/underflows, or other critical flaws (7.2 Code Security).H-02

Issue

Due to the absence of verified source code, the actual functionality, business logic, and security posture of the contract remain entirely unknown. It is impossible to determine if the contract contains common vulnerabilities such as reentrancy, integer overflows/underflows, or other critical flaws (7.2 Code Security).

Fix

Without verified source code, users should assume the contract's functionality is arbitrary and potentially malicious. Avoid any interaction with this contract until its source code is verified and thoroughly reviewed.

Status

Unresolved

High

Undeterminable Access Control Mechanisms

The access control mechanisms (7.3 Access Control) of the contract cannot be assessed without source code. It is unknown who has privileged access, what actions they can perform, and if these privileges are appropriately restricted. This could lead to unauthorized control over funds or critical contract functions.H-03

Issue

The access control mechanisms (7.3 Access Control) of the contract cannot be assessed without source code. It is unknown who has privileged access, what actions they can perform, and if these privileges are appropriately restricted. This could lead to unauthorized control over funds or critical contract functions.

Fix

Verify source code to allow for a proper assessment of access control. Implement robust, role-based access control with multi-signature requirements for critical operations.

Status

Unresolved

High

Undeterminable Upgradeability and Immutability

The upgradeability status (7.7 Upgrades) of the contract is unknown. It cannot be determined if the contract is immutable or if it implements an upgrade pattern (e.g., proxy). If upgradeable, the mechanism and control over upgrades are opaque, posing a high risk of malicious changes to the contract's logic post-deployment.H-04

Issue

The upgradeability status (7.7 Upgrades) of the contract is unknown. It cannot be determined if the contract is immutable or if it implements an upgrade pattern (e.g., proxy). If upgradeable, the mechanism and control over upgrades are opaque, posing a high risk of malicious changes to the contract's logic post-deployment.

Fix

If the contract is intended to be upgradeable, verify the source code to confirm the upgrade pattern and ensure upgradeability is controlled by a secure, multi-signature governance mechanism. If immutable, this should be verifiable from the source.

Status

Unresolved

High

Unassessable Economic and Governance Models

The economic model (7.4 Economic) and governance structure (7.5 Governance) of the contract cannot be evaluated. This prevents analysis of potential economic exploits, such as oracle manipulation, flash loan vulnerabilities, or centralized control over critical parameters. The contract's interaction with external protocols (7.6 External) is also unknown.H-05

Issue

The economic model (7.4 Economic) and governance structure (7.5 Governance) of the contract cannot be evaluated. This prevents analysis of potential economic exploits, such as oracle manipulation, flash loan vulnerabilities, or centralized control over critical parameters. The contract's interaction with external protocols (7.6 External) is also unknown.

Fix

Provide verified source code and comprehensive documentation detailing the economic model, governance structure, and any external dependencies. This is crucial for users to understand the financial risks and control mechanisms.

Status

Unresolved

Low

Absence of Public Audit Report

There is no publicly available security audit report for this contract. While not a direct vulnerability, the absence of an independent security review increases the overall risk profile, especially given the lack of verified source code.L-01

Issue

There is no publicly available security audit report for this contract. While not a direct vulnerability, the absence of an independent security review increases the overall risk profile, especially given the lack of verified source code.

Fix

Once source code is verified, engage reputable security auditors to conduct a thorough audit. Publish the audit report transparently for community review.

Status

Unresolved

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Sep 4
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

This audit report addresses a contract deployed on Arbitrum at 0x91c95440403263f60f71a2cdc8d1a824b6fbde33. Crucially, no source code was provided for analysis, rendering a comprehensive security assessment impossible. The lack of verified source code introduces significant and unquantifiable risks across all security domains, making any interaction with this contract highly speculative and dangerous. Users are strongly advised against interacting with unverified contracts.

Technical1/10High risk

Without verified source code, a comprehensive technical security assessment (7.1 Architecture, 7.2 Code Security) is impossible. The contract's architecture, logic, and potential vulnerabilities like reentrancy, integer overflows, or access control flaws cannot be analyzed. This fundamental lack of transparency introduces significant technical risk, as the deployed bytecode's functionality remains entirely unknown and unauditable. No technical strengths can be identified without code.

Governance1/10High risk

The economic model (7.4 Economic) and governance mechanisms (7.5 Governance) of this contract cannot be determined without source code. This prevents any analysis of potential economic exploits, such as oracle manipulation, flash loan attacks, or unfair distribution of value. The absence of transparency makes it impossible to assess the contract's financial stability, its reliance on external protocols (7.6 External), or the control structures in place (7.3 Access Control).

Upgrades4/10Medium risk

The upgradeability status (7.7 Upgrades) of this contract is unknown without source code. It is impossible to determine if the contract is a proxy, if it uses a specific upgrade pattern (e.g., UUPS, Transparent), or if it is immutable. This lack of information poses a high risk, as malicious upgrade capabilities could be present, allowing for arbitrary changes to contract logic, potentially leading to asset loss or system compromise. No upgrade safety can be confirmed.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

Interacting with smart contracts that lack verified source code on block explorers carries extreme risk.

Users cannot ascertain the contract's intended functionality, security posture, or potential for malicious behavior. It is strongly recommended to avoid deploying or interacting with contracts that do not have publicly verified source code, as this is a fundamental requirement for transparency and trust in the blockchain ecosystem. Always prioritize contracts with comprehensive documentation and independent security audits.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
Type-
NetworkArbitrum
Token age23h
Contract0x91c9…de33
Deployer0xe7ed…3293
Badge for your website
Adapt security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Aug 17, 2026100Critical

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Related Audits

6 more on the recordAll audits
TermiXTMX · Arbitrum96CriticalGU FactoryGU · Arbitrum89CriticalNinja Squad TokenNST · Arbitrum88CriticalAxelar Wrapped LAVALAVA · Arbitrum87CriticalGUBERTOArbitrum85CriticalVangridVAN · Arbitrum84High

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Adapt?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page