Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is 8453 Trenchors a Scam?

TRENCHORSBase
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Oct 28, 2026 · 1 audit on recordNew Launch · 14h old
SummaryAI Copilot

The contract at the provided address is not verified on the Base block explorer.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Mint capability UNKNOWN
  • Ownership status UNKNOWN
  • LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
  • Volume/Liquidity > 15×
  • Top-10 concentration > 20%
  • Contract source not verified — its logic cannot be read
Exact factors
  • Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
  • Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
  • LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
  • Volume/Liquidity > 15× (21.8× — wash-trading signal)
  • Top-10 concentration > 20% (32.3% total → 24.4% effective; 19.2% in EOAs, 13.2% in contracts)
  • Contract source NOT verified — its logic cannot be read

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (14h old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Oct 283 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedNot verified
OwnershipUnknown
MintUnknown
Liquidity lockUnknown
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Oct 28, 2026702 holders
13.2%Contracts19.2%Wallets67.7%Everyone else
13.2%Contracts19.2%Wallets67.7%Everyone else
ContractsWalletsEveryone elseBubble area = share of supply
32.3%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking13.2%
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell19.2%
  • Everyone else692 holders67.7%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads24.4%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 28, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Oct 28$155.7K

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensUnknown

Whether the LP tokens are locked could not be determined.

Analysed pool$155.7KShare of depth100.0%

Security Findings

1 Critical5 Info
Critical

Unverified Contract Source Code

The contract source code is not published on the block explorer, preventing any security assessment of the logic, ownership, or token mechanics.C-01

Issue

The contract source code is not published on the block explorer, preventing any security assessment of the logic, ownership, or token mechanics.

Fix

Verify the contract source code on the block explorer to allow for community and security review.

Status

Unresolved

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 32.3% of supply. What remains: 19.2% in wallets, 13.2% in other contracts. 702 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 32.3% of supply. What remains: 19.2% in wallets, 13.2% in other contracts. 702 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Not listed by any independent source

702 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

702 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $156K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $3.4M (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $156K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $3.4M (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $156K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $156K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.

Fix

Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Recently launched — less than a day of market history

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT

Issue

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.

Fix

Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 28
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The contract at the provided address is not verified on the Base block explorer. Consequently, the source code is unavailable for security analysis. Investors should exercise extreme caution as unverified contracts may contain malicious functions, such as hidden minting, blacklisting, or honeypot mechanisms.

Technical6/10Medium risk

7.1 Architecture: Unknown. 7.2 Code Security: Cannot be audited due to lack of source code. 7.3 Access Control: Cannot be verified. 7.6 External: Interactions with DEXs cannot be assessed for safety.

Governance2/10High risk

7.4 Economic: Tokenomics and supply controls are opaque. 7.5 Governance: Ownership structure and potential administrative backdoors remain hidden. Users have no visibility into tax mechanisms or transfer restrictions.

Upgrades6/10Medium risk

7.7 Upgrades: The upgradeability status cannot be confirmed. 7.8 Operations: Operational security is entirely dependent on the deployer's intent, which cannot be verified through code.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

Do not interact with this contract. Without verified source code, it is impossible to determine if the contract contains malicious logic or backdoors.

Investors should prioritize projects that provide fully verified source code and transparent documentation.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
Type-
NetworkBase
Token age14h
Contract0x29ec…a890
Deployer0xf95f…a9ff
Badge for your website
8453 Trenchors security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Oct 28, 202664Medium

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of 8453 Trenchors?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified