The ZyfaiOFT contract is an Omnichain Fungible Token (OFT) implementation using LayerZero standards. The architecture is robust, leveraging established libraries for cross-chain messaging. The primary risk involves the minting capability inherent in the OFT standard, which allows for supply expansion during cross-chain transfers.
On-chain security analysis — is it a scam or legit?
Is ZyFAI Safe?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The ZyfaiOFT contract is an Omnichain Fungible Token (OFT) implementation using LayerZero standards.
Read the full analysis- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded; held by endpoint: Other-Contract
- Liquidity not locked
- Top-10 concentration > 20%
Exact factors
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded; held by endpoint: Other-Contract
- Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool; this pool is 99% of DEX liquidity) — who holds it cannot be verified
- Top-10 concentration > 20% (67.1% total → 24.9% effective; 3.7% in EOAs, 52.8% in contracts; 10.5% burned, locked or in pools excluded)
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Oct 28Holders
as of audit · Oct 28, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking52.8%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell3.7%
- DEX poolsthe pools' own liquidity10.5%
- Everyone else4,268 holders32.9%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 28, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Oct 28- Uniswap v3WETHAnalysed$261.4K98.9%
- Hydrex CLAMMWETH$1.6K0.6%
- Hydrex OMNIWETH$1.1K0.4%
- Uniswap v4USDC$1850.1%
- AerodromeWETH$30.0%
The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.
0xdb60…f7d70xd82f…e9620xd860…84800x55b8…cde6Security Findings
MediumDynamic Token Supply via Cross-Chain Minting
The functions send, lzReceiveSimulate, and lzReceive allow for the minting of new tokens as part of the cross-chain transfer process. This increases the total supply of the token, which can lead to the dilution of existing holders if the cross-chain bridge is compromised or if minting parameters are misconfigured.CP-01
Issue
The functions send, lzReceiveSimulate, and lzReceive allow for the minting of new tokens as part of the cross-chain transfer process. This increases the total supply of the token, which can lead to the dilution of existing holders if the cross-chain bridge is compromised or if minting parameters are misconfigured.
Fix
Monitor the total supply and cross-chain activity closely. Ensure that the LayerZero endpoint and peer configurations are strictly managed by the multisig and that any changes to enforced options are thoroughly tested on a testnet before deployment.
Status
Unresolved
MediumLiquidity not locked
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 3 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0xdb60…f7d7 — holds 99.6% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY
Issue
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 3 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0xdb60…f7d7 — holds 99.6% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.
Fix
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 67.1% of supply. Of that, 10.5% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 3.7% in wallets, 52.8% in other contracts. 4,278 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 67.1% of supply. Of that, 10.5% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 3.7% in wallets, 52.8% in other contracts. 4,278 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoListed, but not independently verified
Listed on CoinGecko as Zyfai (ZFI), market cap $2M, rank #2390. 4,278 holders.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
Listed on CoinGecko as Zyfai (ZFI), market cap $2M, rank #2390. 4,278 holders.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $264K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $9K (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $53K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $264K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $9K (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $53K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Wrapped or bridged asset
A token representing another asset's units 1:1, backed by a wrapping contract, a custodian or a bridge. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: a copy of the coin from its home chain (zksync), minted here by LayerZero (lzReceive). Tokenomics — Supply: minted here by LayerZero (lzReceive) against tokens locked or burned on other chains. Control: a 3-of-5 multisig. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $264K of DEX liquidity across 6 pools. Launch: 509 days of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token representing another asset's units 1:1, backed by a wrapping contract, a custodian or a bridge. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: a copy of the coin from its home chain (zksync), minted here by LayerZero (lzReceive). Tokenomics — Supply: minted here by LayerZero (lzReceive) against tokens locked or burned on other chains. Control: a 3-of-5 multisig. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $264K of DEX liquidity across 6 pools. Launch: 509 days of market history.
Fix
The backing is the risk: check who holds the underlying asset and how redemption works.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 28The contract utilizes standard LayerZero OFT libraries, ensuring 7.1 Architecture and 7.2 Code Security compliance. 7.3 Access Control is correctly implemented using Ownable for administrative functions. 7.6 External interactions are limited to the LayerZero endpoint, which is a trusted dependency. The code is clean and follows modern Solidity patterns.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance risks are centered on the minting mechanism. While necessary for cross-chain functionality, the ability to mint tokens via lzReceive introduces potential dilution risks. The protocol relies on a 3-of-5 multisig for administrative control, providing a reasonable balance between security and operational agility.
The contract is not upgradeable (7.7 Upgrades), which eliminates risks associated with proxy logic flaws. 7.8 Operations are managed via standard ownership patterns. No further upgradeability concerns exist.
The protocol is well-structured. We recommend maintaining the multisig threshold and ensuring that the LayerZero endpoint configuration remains audited and monitored for any updates to the underlying messaging protocol.
Users should be aware that the total supply of the token is dynamic due to the OFT cross-chain minting mechanism. Ensure that the multisig signers are geographically and organizationally distributed to mitigate single-point-of-failure risks.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Oct 28, 202646Medium
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the ZFI contract address?
The ZyFAI (ZFI) contract on Base is 0xd080ed3c74a20250a2c9821885203034acd2d5ae. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.
Is ZyFAI a scam?
Quantum Audit's risk score for ZyFAI is 46/100 (Medium risk) as of Oct 28, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Ownership: Retained; Mint: Mintable; Liquidity lock: Not locked; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.
Is ZFI liquidity locked?
Liquidity lock: Not locked (as of Oct 28, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $264.2K.
Who holds ZFI?
As of Oct 28, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 67.1% of the supply across 4,278 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of ZyFAI?
Our AI-powered scanner gives you a deeper, real-time smart contract analysis — free, with every scoring factor shown.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified