The PangeaOFTV2 contract implements an Omnichain Fungible Token (OFT) standard on the Base network. The architecture relies on LayerZero for cross-chain messaging and utilizes a multi-role access control system for supply management and metadata updates. While the core logic follows standard OFT patterns, the presence of privileged minting capabilities requires careful monitoring of the supply reporter role.
Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is Zero Gap a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The PangeaOFTV2 contract implements an Omnichain Fungible Token (OFT) standard on the Base network.
Read the full analysis- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded; held by endpoint: Other-Contract, supplyreporter: Other-Contract
- Liquidity not locked
- Liquidity < $50k
Exact factors
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded; held by endpoint: Other-Contract, supplyreporter: Other-Contract
- Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool) — who holds it cannot be verified
- Liquidity < $50k ($30,290 across 1 pairs — thin market)
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Oct 25Holders
as of audit · Oct 25, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking7.3%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell5.2%
- Everyone else80 holders87.5%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 25, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Oct 25The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.
0x6fb9…43bf0x6358…651bSecurity Findings
MediumPrivileged Minting and Supply Manipulation
The functions 'send', 'lzReceive', 'lzReceiveSimulate', and 'reportSupply' allow privileged roles (endpoint or supplyReporter) to increase the total token supply. This capability can lead to the dilution of existing token holders if the privileged roles are compromised or act maliciously.CP-01
Issue
The functions 'send', 'lzReceive', 'lzReceiveSimulate', and 'reportSupply' allow privileged roles (endpoint or supplyReporter) to increase the total token supply. This capability can lead to the dilution of existing token holders if the privileged roles are compromised or act maliciously.
Fix
Restrict the 'supplyReporter' role to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract. Implement a hard cap on the total supply if possible, or introduce a timelock for any significant supply adjustments.
Status
Unresolved
MediumLiquidity not locked
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 2 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0x6fb9…43bf — holds 56.1% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY
Issue
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 2 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0x6fb9…43bf — holds 56.1% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.
Fix
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 12.5% of supply. What remains: 5.2% in wallets, 7.3% in other contracts. 90 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 12.5% of supply. What remains: 5.2% in wallets, 7.3% in other contracts. 90 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
90 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
90 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $30K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $192K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $30K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $192K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $30K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $30K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 25The architecture (7.1) is robust, leveraging established LayerZero OFT standards for cross-chain interoperability. Code security (7.2) is high, with clean implementation of ERC-20 and OFT interfaces. Access control (7.3) is granular, separating metadata management from supply reporting. External dependencies (7.6) are limited to the LayerZero endpoint, which is a standard industry practice.
Economic (7.4) and Governance (7.5) risks are centered on the supply reporter role. The ability to mint tokens via reportSupply or cross-chain messages introduces potential dilution risks for holders. Operations (7.8) are centralized under specific roles, requiring high trust in the entities holding these keys.
The contract is not currently deployed as a proxy (7.7), meaning the logic is immutable. This eliminates risks associated with malicious proxy upgrades. Future changes would require a full migration to a new contract address.
The protocol should implement a multi-signature wallet or a timelock controller for the 'supplyReporter' and 'metadataAuthority' roles to mitigate the risk of single-point-of-failure compromises.
Additionally, ensure that the addresses assigned to these roles are monitored for anomalous activity. Regular audits of the LayerZero configuration and the 'enforcedOptions' state are recommended to ensure cross-chain messaging remains secure and aligned with the protocol's intended economic parameters.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Oct 25, 202654Medium
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the ZGAP contract address?
The Zero Gap (ZGAP) contract on Base is 0xdba134ad399e15d9175ce6bc97beca7001fb96ea. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.
Is Zero Gap a scam?
Quantum Audit's risk score for Zero Gap is 54/100 (Medium risk) as of Oct 25, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Ownership: Retained; Mint: Mintable; Liquidity lock: Not locked; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.
Is ZGAP liquidity locked?
Liquidity lock: Not locked (as of Oct 25, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $30.3K.
Who holds ZGAP?
As of Oct 25, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 12.5% of the supply across 90 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Zero Gap?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page