Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is Zero Gap a Scam?

ZGAPBase
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Oct 25, 2026 · 1 audit on recordNew Launch · 7h old
SummaryAI Copilot

The PangeaOFTV2 contract implements an Omnichain Fungible Token (OFT) standard on the Base network.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded; held by endpoint: Other-Contract, supplyreporter: Other-Contract
  • Liquidity not locked
  • Liquidity < $50k
Exact factors
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded; held by endpoint: Other-Contract, supplyreporter: Other-Contract
  • Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool) — who holds it cannot be verified
  • Liquidity < $50k ($30,290 across 1 pairs — thin market)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (7h old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Oct 254 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipRetained
MintMintable
Liquidity lockNot locked
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Oct 25, 202690 holders
7.3%Contracts5.2%87.5%Everyone else
7.3%5.2%87.5%Everyone else
ContractsWalletsEveryone elseBubble area = share of supply
12.5%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking7.3%
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell5.2%
  • Everyone else80 holders87.5%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads8.1%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 25, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Oct 25$30.3K

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensNot locked

The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.

Analysed pool$30.3KShare of depth100.0%
Top-1 Unlocked Holder56.1%
Top-3 Unlocked100.0%
Unlocked LP held by
0x6fb9…43bf0x6358…651b

Security Findings

2 Medium5 Info
Medium

Privileged Minting and Supply Manipulation

The functions 'send', 'lzReceive', 'lzReceiveSimulate', and 'reportSupply' allow privileged roles (endpoint or supplyReporter) to increase the total token supply. This capability can lead to the dilution of existing token holders if the privileged roles are compromised or act maliciously.CP-01

Issue

The functions 'send', 'lzReceive', 'lzReceiveSimulate', and 'reportSupply' allow privileged roles (endpoint or supplyReporter) to increase the total token supply. This capability can lead to the dilution of existing token holders if the privileged roles are compromised or act maliciously.

Fix

Restrict the 'supplyReporter' role to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract. Implement a hard cap on the total supply if possible, or introduce a timelock for any significant supply adjustments.

Status

Unresolved

Medium

Liquidity not locked

0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 2 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0x6fb9…43bf — holds 56.1% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY

Issue

0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 2 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0x6fb9…43bf — holds 56.1% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.

Fix

Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 12.5% of supply. What remains: 5.2% in wallets, 7.3% in other contracts. 90 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 12.5% of supply. What remains: 5.2% in wallets, 7.3% in other contracts. 90 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Not listed by any independent source

90 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

90 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $30K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $192K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $30K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $192K (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $30K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $30K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.

Fix

Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Recently launched — less than a day of market history

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT

Issue

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.

Fix

Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 25
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The PangeaOFTV2 contract implements an Omnichain Fungible Token (OFT) standard on the Base network. The architecture relies on LayerZero for cross-chain messaging and utilizes a multi-role access control system for supply management and metadata updates. While the core logic follows standard OFT patterns, the presence of privileged minting capabilities requires careful monitoring of the supply reporter role.

Technical8/10Low risk

The architecture (7.1) is robust, leveraging established LayerZero OFT standards for cross-chain interoperability. Code security (7.2) is high, with clean implementation of ERC-20 and OFT interfaces. Access control (7.3) is granular, separating metadata management from supply reporting. External dependencies (7.6) are limited to the LayerZero endpoint, which is a standard industry practice.

Governance1/10High risk

Economic (7.4) and Governance (7.5) risks are centered on the supply reporter role. The ability to mint tokens via reportSupply or cross-chain messages introduces potential dilution risks for holders. Operations (7.8) are centralized under specific roles, requiring high trust in the entities holding these keys.

Upgrades3/10High risk

The contract is not currently deployed as a proxy (7.7), meaning the logic is immutable. This eliminates risks associated with malicious proxy upgrades. Future changes would require a full migration to a new contract address.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

The protocol should implement a multi-signature wallet or a timelock controller for the 'supplyReporter' and 'metadataAuthority' roles to mitigate the risk of single-point-of-failure compromises.

Additionally, ensure that the addresses assigned to these roles are monitored for anomalous activity. Regular audits of the LayerZero configuration and the 'enforcedOptions' state are recommended to ensure cross-chain messaging remains secure and aligned with the protocol's intended economic parameters.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypeToken
NetworkBase
Token age7h
Contract0xdba1…96ea
Deployer0xc5d2…9bf5
Badge for your website
Zero Gap security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Oct 25, 202654Medium

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the ZGAP contract address?

The Zero Gap (ZGAP) contract on Base is 0xdba134ad399e15d9175ce6bc97beca7001fb96ea. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.

Is Zero Gap a scam?

Quantum Audit's risk score for Zero Gap is 54/100 (Medium risk) as of Oct 25, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Ownership: Retained; Mint: Mintable; Liquidity lock: Not locked; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.

Is ZGAP liquidity locked?

Liquidity lock: Not locked (as of Oct 25, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $30.3K.

Who holds ZGAP?

As of Oct 25, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 12.5% of the supply across 90 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Zero Gap?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page