Is zerebro Safe? Smart Contract Security Analysis

zerebro ZEREBRO

8x5Vqb…o2Wn

Solana Not verifiedLast checked 3d ago 1 audit on record

DexScreener ↗

70 / 100

High Risk

Executive SummaryAI Copilot

The zerebro (ZEREBRO) SPL token mint exhibits critical risks primarily due to its classification as high-risk by an independent third-party registry and extreme holder concentration, with the top 10 accounts holding 77.67% of the supply. Key mint authorities, including mint and freeze, are revoked, and metadata is immutable, which are positive security aspects. However, the significant centralization of token ownership and the external high-risk flag warrant extreme caution. Chain-native RPC holder distribution data was unavailable.

1 Critical1 High

Volume 24h

$201.8K

Liquidity

$3.27M

Price

$0.03697

Token Age

Top 10 Holders

78.6%

Security Findings

1 Crit1 High

Critical

Flagged High-Risk by Third-Party Registry

C-01An independent third-party risk registry classifies this token as high-risk based on its own dataset (developer history, LP movements).

IssueAn independent third-party risk registry classifies this token as high-risk based on its own dataset (developer history, LP movements).

FixDo not interact with this token.

StatusUnresolved

High

Holder Concentration > 70%

H-01Top 10 token accounts hold 77.67% of supply. Coordinated sell-off would crash price; single-whale dumps are common in this range.

IssueTop 10 token accounts hold 77.67% of supply. Coordinated sell-off would crash price; single-whale dumps are common in this range.

FixExercise caution due to significant control by a small number of holders. Monitor large holder movements.

StatusUnresolved

Category Ratings

TechnicalHigh3/10

The zerebro token is implemented using the standard spl-token program. Both the mint authority and freeze authority have been revoked, preventing the creation of new tokens or the freezing of existing holder accounts. The token does not utilize any Token-2022 extensions that would introduce mutable balance, closable accounts, or default frozen states, as indicated by `balance_mutable: False` and `default_account_state_frozen: False`. This configuration provides a high degree of immutability for the token's core parameters.

GovernanceHigh1/10

The token exhibits significant holder concentration, with the top 10 token accounts holding 77.67% of the total supply, posing a substantial risk of market manipulation or price volatility from large sell-offs. Despite this, the token has a healthy liquidity of $2,883,627 USD and a 24-hour volume of $1,153,312 USD, with a normal Volume/Liquidity Ratio of 0.40. The DEX pair has been active for 656 days, indicating a relatively established market presence.

UpgradesMedium4/10

The token mint's core parameters are highly immutable, as both the mint authority and freeze authority have been revoked. This means no new tokens can be minted, and no accounts can be frozen by an external party. Furthermore, the token's metadata is not mutable (`metadata_mutable: False`), ensuring that the token name, symbol, or image cannot be changed post-launch. These factors contribute to a low upgrade risk profile for the token's fundamental characteristics.

Security Checklist

1/4 checks passed

Contract VerifiedFail

No Mint Function?

Liquidity LockedFail

Not a ProxyPass

Liquidity Depth

$3.30M across 27 pairs

RaydiumSOLanalysed$3.27M Orca wpSOL$9.7K Meteora DLMMSOL$6.6K Raydium CLMMSOL$4.8K Meteora DLMMSOL$4.0K Orca wpSOL$2.5K

Show 4 more pairsShow less

Raydium CLMMSOL$1.9K Meteora DLMMUSDC$1.7K Meteora DLMMarc$600 Meteora DLMMSOL$457

The 17 remaining pairs hold $685 between them and are not listed.

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

LP Distribution

LP Burned99.3% · ≈ permanent lock

What Raised This Score

7 factors

Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
Contract source NOT verified
Top-10 concentration > 70% (78.6% total → 78.6% effective; 78.6% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts — extreme)
Liquidity NOT locked (owner can withdraw — rug-pull risk)
1 Critical finding(s) from audit
1 High finding(s) from audit

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Is zerebro Safe?