Is AINL Safe? Smart Contract Security Analysis

AINL AINL

56hrCR…pump

Solana Not verifiedLast checked 2d ago 1 audit on record

DexScreener ↗

60 / 100

High Risk

Executive SummaryAI Copilot

The AINL SPL Token Mint exhibits a high risk due to extremely low liquidity, which makes large positions difficult to exit without significant loss. While core authorities like mint and freeze are revoked, the lack of sufficient market depth poses a substantial risk to potential holders. Holder distribution data was unavailable, preventing a full assessment of supply concentration.

1 High

Volume 24h

$0.2400

Liquidity

$8.3K

Price

$0.000006788

Token Age

1mo

Top 10 Holders

82.8%

Security Findings

1 High

High

Very Low Liquidity

H-01Total DEX liquidity is $68. Slippage will be severe; large positions cannot be exited without significant loss.

IssueTotal DEX liquidity is $68. Slippage will be severe; large positions cannot be exited without significant loss.

FixAccount for the extremely low liquidity in any swap calculation and be aware that exiting even small positions may incur significant price impact. Avoid large positions until liquidity materially improves.

StatusUnresolved

Category Ratings

TechnicalMedium5/10

The AINL token is implemented using the spl-token-2022 program, indicating modern SPL token standards. Crucially, both the mint authority and freeze authority have been revoked, preventing the creation of new tokens or the freezing of holder accounts. No transfer hook is active, ensuring direct token transfers without external program intervention. The default account state is not frozen, allowing immediate use of newly received tokens.

GovernanceHigh1/10

The token exhibits very low liquidity, with only $68 USD available in DEX pools, making it highly susceptible to price volatility and severe slippage for any significant trade. The 24-hour volume is $0, further indicating a lack of active trading. The pair has been active for 66 days, but this has not translated into meaningful liquidity. Holder concentration data was unavailable, preventing an assessment of potential whale manipulation risks.

UpgradesLow7/10

The token's core parameters are largely immutable due to the revocation of both mint and freeze authorities. Metadata is also immutable, ensuring that the token's name, symbol, or image cannot be changed post-launch. There are no upgradable transfer fees or transfer hooks, providing stability in its operational mechanics.

Security Checklist

2/4 checks passed

Contract VerifiedFail

No Mint Function?

Liquidity LockedPass

Not a ProxyPass

Liquidity Depth

$8.4K across 2 pairs

PumpswapSOLanalysed$8.3K Raydium CPMMUSDC$66

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

LP Distribution

LP Burned100.0% · ≈ permanent lock

LP Locked100.0% · Raydium Lock

What Raised This Score

6 factors

Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
Contract source NOT verified
Top-10 concentration > 70% (82.8% total → 82.8% effective; 82.8% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts — extreme)
Liquidity < $10k ($8,405 across 2 pairs — easily drained)
1 High finding(s) from audit

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Is AINL Safe?