Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

On-chain security analysis — is it a scam or legit?

Is Wrapped SOL Safe?

SOLArbitrum
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Oct 26, 2026 · 1 audit on record
SummaryAI Copilot

The BridgeToken implementation is a standard ERC-20 token with administrative minting capabilities.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
  • Upgradeable proxy — the admin can replace the logic
  • Liquidity not locked
  • Top-10 concentration > 30%
  • The deployer has launched a honeypot before
Exact factors
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
  • Upgradeable proxy — the admin can replace the logic
  • Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool; this pool is 8% of DEX liquidity) — held by independent providers — market-depth risk
  • Top-10 concentration > 30% (81.4% total → 49.2% effective; 27.7% in EOAs, 53.6% in contracts)
  • The deployer has launched a honeypot before

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Security Checklist

as of audit · Oct 263 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipRetained
MintMintable
Liquidity lockNot locked
UpgradeabilityUpgradeable
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Oct 26, 202613,334 holders
53.6%Contracts27.7%Wallets18.6%Everyone else
53.6%Contracts27.7%Wallets18.6%Everyone else
ContractsWalletsEveryone elseBubble area = share of supply
81.4%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking53.6%
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell27.7%
  • Everyone else13,324 holders18.6%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads49.2%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 26, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Oct 26$1.49M across 8 pairs
LP tokensNot locked

The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.

Analysed pool$120.8KShare of depth8.1%
Top-1 Unlocked Holder15.5%
Top-3 Unlocked42.3%
Unlocked LP held by
0xd7f7…6e150x42f2…54fa0x6584…d02d0x3f81…f6c40x9908…409a0x0abb…1df60x12e8…86050x9c8e…64e30xc53a…b7510xe4b8…5627

No privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.

Security Findings

2 Medium5 Info
Medium

Liquidity not locked

0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 82.1% is held, unlocked, by 10 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. No single one holds a majority: their exits thin the market rather than hand anyone the pool. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them. This assessment covers the main pool, which holds 8% of the token's DEX liquidity; the other pools were not assessed.QA-LIQUIDITY

Issue

0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 82.1% is held, unlocked, by 10 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. No single one holds a majority: their exits thin the market rather than hand anyone the pool. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them. This assessment covers the main pool, which holds 8% of the token's DEX liquidity; the other pools were not assessed.

Fix

Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.

Status

Acknowledged

Medium

What the token's controller can do

The contract lets its controller — a contract — mint new supply. Nothing independent vouches for whoever holds them, so each is a live risk to holders.QA-POWERS

Issue

The contract lets its controller — a contract — mint new supply. Nothing independent vouches for whoever holds them, so each is a live risk to holders.

Fix

Check who holds these powers and whether a timelock or multisig stands between them and holders.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

No issues identified in the reviewed source

The verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint/owner authority, mint capability, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.I-01

Issue

The verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint/owner authority, mint capability, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.

Fix

Re-check after any contract upgrade or ownership change, both of which can alter behaviour without changing this page.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 81.4% of supply. What remains: 27.7% in wallets, 53.6% in other contracts. 13,334 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 81.4% of supply. What remains: 27.7% in wallets, 53.6% in other contracts. 13,334 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Listed, but not independently verified

Listed on CoinGecko as Wormhole Bridged WSOL (WSOL). 13,334 holders.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

Listed on CoinGecko as Wormhole Bridged WSOL (WSOL). 13,334 holders.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $1.5M (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $240K (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $43K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $1.5M (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $240K (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $43K (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Wrapped or bridged asset

A token representing another asset's units 1:1, backed by a wrapping contract, a custodian or a bridge. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: CoinGecko category: Bridged-Tokens. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a contract. Code: upgradeable proxy. Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $1.5M of DEX liquidity across 8 pools. Launch: 1149 days of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A token representing another asset's units 1:1, backed by a wrapping contract, a custodian or a bridge. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: CoinGecko category: Bridged-Tokens. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a contract. Code: upgradeable proxy. Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $1.5M of DEX liquidity across 8 pools. Launch: 1149 days of market history.

Fix

The backing is the risk: check who holds the underlying asset and how redemption works.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 26
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The BridgeToken implementation is a standard ERC-20 token with administrative minting capabilities. The contract utilizes a Beacon proxy pattern for upgradability. No critical vulnerabilities were identified in the provided source code analysis. The protocol relies on a centralized owner contract to manage supply and metadata updates.

Technical6/10Medium risk

The contract implements standard ERC-20 functionality with robust arithmetic safety provided by Solidity 0.8.x. 7.1 Architecture follows a standard Beacon proxy pattern, ensuring consistent implementation across instances. 7.2 Code Security is high, with no reentrancy or overflow issues detected. 7.3 Access Control is strictly enforced via the onlyOwner modifier on sensitive functions like minting.

Governance6/10Medium risk

7.4 Economic risk is tied to the centralized minting authority, which can increase supply at will. 7.5 Governance is currently managed by an external contract, which acts as a single point of failure. 7.6 External dependencies are minimal, reducing the attack surface for flash loan or oracle-based manipulation.

Upgrades1/10High risk

7.7 Upgrades are handled via a Beacon proxy, allowing for implementation updates. 7.8 Operations are simplified by this pattern, though it introduces a dependency on the Beacon contract's integrity. The upgrade mechanism is standard but requires trust in the owner's ability to manage the implementation address securely.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

The protocol is well-structured. It is recommended to transition the owner address to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract to mitigate the risks associated with a single point of failure in the minting and upgrade processes.

Ensure that the Beacon contract is also secured behind a multi-sig to prevent unauthorized implementation swaps.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypeBridgeToken
NetworkArbitrum
Token age3y
Contract0x2bcc…0c07
Deployer0x0b24…d39c
Proxy Upgrade Controls
Proxy TypeBeacon
ImplementationVerified source
Upgrades (30d)0 · stable
Badge for your website
Wrapped SOL security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Oct 26, 202670High

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the SOL contract address?

The Wrapped SOL (SOL) contract on Arbitrum is 0x2bcc6d6cdbbdc0a4071e48bb3b969b06b3330c07. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.

Is Wrapped SOL a scam?

Quantum Audit's risk score for Wrapped SOL is 70/100 (High risk) as of Oct 26, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Ownership: Retained; Mint: Mintable; Liquidity lock: Not locked; Upgradeability: Upgradeable; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.

Is SOL liquidity locked?

Liquidity lock: Not locked (as of Oct 26, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $1.49M.

Who holds SOL?

As of Oct 26, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 81.4% of the supply across 13,334 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Wrapped SOL?

Our AI-powered scanner gives you a deeper, real-time smart contract analysis — free, with every scoring factor shown.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified