The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 token with additional governance and vesting capabilities. The architecture relies heavily on a centralized owner account, which possesses significant control over token supply and transferability. While the code follows standard OpenZeppelin patterns, the centralization of power presents a notable risk to token holders.
Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is World Water Reserve a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 token with additional governance and vesting capabilities.
Read the full analysis- Owner can pause all transfers
- A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
- Liquidity not locked
- Top-10 concentration > 30%
Exact factors
- Owner can pause all transfers
- A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
- Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool) — who holds it cannot be verified
- Top-10 concentration > 30% (100.0% total → 48.3% effective; 16.2% in EOAs, 80.0% in contracts; 3.7% burned, locked or in pools excluded)
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Oct 21Holders
as of audit · Oct 21, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking80.0%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell16.2%
- Burnedout of circulation3.7%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 21, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Oct 21The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.
0x7185…02abSecurity Findings
MediumCentralized Token Minting Control
The owner has the authority to mint new tokens via the updateMintRate and release functions. This allows the owner to increase the total supply, which directly dilutes the value of existing holdings.CP-01
Issue
The owner has the authority to mint new tokens via the updateMintRate and release functions. This allows the owner to increase the total supply, which directly dilutes the value of existing holdings.
Fix
Implement a timelock for all minting-related functions or transition ownership to a decentralized governance DAO to prevent unilateral supply changes.
Status
Unresolved
MediumCentralized Control Over Transferability
The owner can toggle the isPoolUnlocked switch using the lockPool and unlockPool functions. This allows the owner to unilaterally halt or resume token transfers, effectively freezing user assets.CP-05
Issue
The owner can toggle the isPoolUnlocked switch using the lockPool and unlockPool functions. This allows the owner to unilaterally halt or resume token transfers, effectively freezing user assets.
Fix
Remove the ability for the owner to pause transfers, or restrict this functionality to a decentralized emergency pause mechanism with a mandatory delay.
Status
Unresolved
MediumLiquidity not locked
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0x7185…02ab — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY
Issue
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0x7185…02ab — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.
Fix
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.7% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 3,018 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.7% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 3,018 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
3,018 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
3,018 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $52K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $45K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $52K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $45K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $52K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $52K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 21The contract utilizes well-audited OpenZeppelin libraries for core ERC-20 and governance functionality. 7.1 Architecture is modular, and 7.2 Code Security is high due to the use of standard, battle-tested implementations. However, 7.3 Access Control is highly centralized, allowing the owner to modify critical state variables. 7.6 External interactions are minimal, reducing the attack surface for reentrancy or flash loan exploits.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance aspects are dominated by the owner's ability to mint tokens and restrict transfers. The 2% annual inflation cap provides some protection against hyper-inflation, but the owner retains full control over the timing and execution of these mints. 7.8 Operations are transparent, but the lack of a timelock or multi-sig requirement for these privileged functions is a significant governance weakness.
7.7 Upgrades are not supported as the contract is not a proxy. This eliminates risks associated with implementation logic changes but prevents the protocol from patching vulnerabilities without a full migration. The current state is immutable regarding the contract logic itself.
It is recommended to transition the ownership of the contract to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract to mitigate the risks associated with a single point of failure.
Implementing a timelock on all privileged functions, such as updateMintRate and lockPool, would provide the community with sufficient notice before significant changes to the token economy or transfer rules occur. Additionally, consider documenting the specific conditions under which the pool lock mechanism is intended to be used to ensure transparency for users. Regular monitoring of the owner's actions is advised until a more decentralized governance structure is implemented.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Oct 21, 202662Medium
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the WWR contract address?
The World Water Reserve (WWR) contract on Base is 0x3b47b47651c1131b8594d8e8b3786abe9e196d4c. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.
Is World Water Reserve a scam?
Quantum Audit's risk score for World Water Reserve is 62/100 (Medium risk) as of Oct 21, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Ownership: Retained; Mint: Mintable; Liquidity lock: Not locked; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.
Is WWR liquidity locked?
Liquidity lock: Not locked (as of Oct 21, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $51.9K.
Who holds WWR?
As of Oct 21, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 100.0% of the supply across 3,018 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of World Water Reserve?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page