Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is World Water Reserve a Scam?

WWRBase
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Oct 21, 2026 · 1 audit on recordNew Launch · 2d old
SummaryAI Copilot

The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 token with additional governance and vesting capabilities.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Owner can pause all transfers
  • A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
  • Liquidity not locked
  • Top-10 concentration > 30%
Exact factors
  • Owner can pause all transfers
  • A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
  • Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool) — who holds it cannot be verified
  • Top-10 concentration > 30% (100.0% total → 48.1% effective; 16.1% in EOAs, 80.1% in contracts; 3.8% burned, locked or in pools excluded)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (2d old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Oct 214 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipRetained
MintMintable
Liquidity lockNot locked
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Oct 21, 20262,072 holders
80.1%Contracts16.1%Wallets3.8%
80.1%Contracts16.1%Wallets3.8%
ContractsWalletsBurnedBubble area = share of supply
100.0%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking80.1%
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell16.1%
  • Burnedout of circulation3.8%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads48.1%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 21, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Oct 21$50.8K

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensNot locked

The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.

Analysed pool$50.8KShare of depth100.0%

Security Findings

2 Medium5 Info
Medium

Centralized Minting Control

The owner has the authority to call updateMintRate and release, which can increase the total supply of the token. This allows the owner to dilute existing token holders at their discretion.CP-01

Issue

The owner has the authority to call updateMintRate and release, which can increase the total supply of the token. This allows the owner to dilute existing token holders at their discretion.

Fix

Implement a timelock for minting operations or transition ownership to a decentralized governance contract to ensure community oversight.

Status

Unresolved

Medium

Administrative Transfer Control

The owner can use lockPool and unlockPool to enable or disable transfers for specific pools. This grants the owner the power to effectively freeze user assets or restrict liquidity at will.CP-05

Issue

The owner can use lockPool and unlockPool to enable or disable transfers for specific pools. This grants the owner the power to effectively freeze user assets or restrict liquidity at will.

Fix

Remove the ability to arbitrarily lock transfers or implement a transparent, rule-based system that does not rely on manual owner intervention.

Status

Unresolved

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.1% in wallets, 80.1% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.0%. 2,072 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.1% in wallets, 80.1% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.0%. 2,072 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Not listed by any independent source

2,072 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

2,072 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $51K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $39K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $51K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $39K (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $51K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: 2 days of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $51K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: 2 days of market history.

Fix

Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Recently launched — 2 days of market history

The token's oldest DEX pool is 2 days old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT

Issue

The token's oldest DEX pool is 2 days old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.

Fix

Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 21
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 token with additional governance and vesting capabilities. The protocol relies on a centralized owner to manage inflation and liquidity pool access. While the code follows standard OpenZeppelin patterns, the high degree of administrative control presents a significant trust requirement for token holders.

Technical8/10Low risk

The architecture utilizes standard OpenZeppelin libraries for ERC-20, Votes, and Permit functionality, ensuring robust base implementation. 7.1 Architecture and 7.2 Code Security are well-structured, leveraging battle-tested components. 7.3 Access Control is strictly enforced via Ownable, though the scope of administrative power is broad. 7.8 Operations are standard, with no complex off-chain dependencies identified.

Governance2/10High risk

7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance aspects are heavily centralized under the contract owner. The owner has the ability to mint tokens and toggle transfer restrictions, which directly impacts the economic value of the token. 7.6 External dependencies are minimal, reducing the surface area for flash loan or oracle manipulation attacks.

Upgrades3/10High risk

7.7 Upgrades are not implemented via proxy patterns; the contract is immutable. This eliminates risks associated with malicious logic updates. However, it also prevents the protocol from patching potential bugs without a migration process.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

The project should consider transitioning administrative control to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance DAO to mitigate the risk of a single point of failure.

Implementing a timelock on sensitive functions like updateMintRate would provide transparency and allow the community to react to significant economic changes. Users should be aware that the owner retains the ability to halt transfers and increase the total supply. We recommend monitoring the owner's activity and ensuring that the vesting schedules are clearly communicated to the community.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypeToken
NetworkBase
Token age2d
Contract0x4321…e093
Deployer0x735b…81ff
Badge for your website
World Water Reserve security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Oct 21, 202660Medium

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the WWR contract address?

The World Water Reserve (WWR) contract on Base is 0x432111e7965110f8c790f98e92cd5b3c7fade093. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.

Is World Water Reserve a scam?

Quantum Audit's risk score for World Water Reserve is 60/100 (Medium risk) as of Oct 21, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Ownership: Retained; Mint: Mintable; Liquidity lock: Not locked; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.

Is WWR liquidity locked?

Liquidity lock: Not locked (as of Oct 21, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $50.8K.

Who holds WWR?

As of Oct 21, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 100.0% of the supply across 2,072 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of World Water Reserve?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page