The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 token with additional governance and vesting capabilities. The protocol relies on a centralized owner to manage inflation and liquidity pool access. While the code follows standard OpenZeppelin patterns, the high degree of administrative control presents a significant trust requirement for token holders.
Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is World Water Reserve a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 token with additional governance and vesting capabilities.
Read the full analysis- Owner can pause all transfers
- A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
- Liquidity not locked
- Top-10 concentration > 30%
Exact factors
- Owner can pause all transfers
- A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
- Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool) — who holds it cannot be verified
- Top-10 concentration > 30% (100.0% total → 48.1% effective; 16.1% in EOAs, 80.1% in contracts; 3.8% burned, locked or in pools excluded)
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Oct 21Holders
as of audit · Oct 21, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking80.1%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell16.1%
- Burnedout of circulation3.8%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 21, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Oct 21The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.
Security Findings
MediumCentralized Minting Control
The owner has the authority to call updateMintRate and release, which can increase the total supply of the token. This allows the owner to dilute existing token holders at their discretion.CP-01
Issue
The owner has the authority to call updateMintRate and release, which can increase the total supply of the token. This allows the owner to dilute existing token holders at their discretion.
Fix
Implement a timelock for minting operations or transition ownership to a decentralized governance contract to ensure community oversight.
Status
Unresolved
MediumAdministrative Transfer Control
The owner can use lockPool and unlockPool to enable or disable transfers for specific pools. This grants the owner the power to effectively freeze user assets or restrict liquidity at will.CP-05
Issue
The owner can use lockPool and unlockPool to enable or disable transfers for specific pools. This grants the owner the power to effectively freeze user assets or restrict liquidity at will.
Fix
Remove the ability to arbitrarily lock transfers or implement a transparent, rule-based system that does not rely on manual owner intervention.
Status
Unresolved
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.1% in wallets, 80.1% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.0%. 2,072 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.1% in wallets, 80.1% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.0%. 2,072 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
2,072 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
2,072 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $51K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $39K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $51K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $39K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $51K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: 2 days of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $51K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: 2 days of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — 2 days of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is 2 days old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is 2 days old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 21The architecture utilizes standard OpenZeppelin libraries for ERC-20, Votes, and Permit functionality, ensuring robust base implementation. 7.1 Architecture and 7.2 Code Security are well-structured, leveraging battle-tested components. 7.3 Access Control is strictly enforced via Ownable, though the scope of administrative power is broad. 7.8 Operations are standard, with no complex off-chain dependencies identified.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance aspects are heavily centralized under the contract owner. The owner has the ability to mint tokens and toggle transfer restrictions, which directly impacts the economic value of the token. 7.6 External dependencies are minimal, reducing the surface area for flash loan or oracle manipulation attacks.
7.7 Upgrades are not implemented via proxy patterns; the contract is immutable. This eliminates risks associated with malicious logic updates. However, it also prevents the protocol from patching potential bugs without a migration process.
The project should consider transitioning administrative control to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance DAO to mitigate the risk of a single point of failure.
Implementing a timelock on sensitive functions like updateMintRate would provide transparency and allow the community to react to significant economic changes. Users should be aware that the owner retains the ability to halt transfers and increase the total supply. We recommend monitoring the owner's activity and ensuring that the vesting schedules are clearly communicated to the community.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Oct 21, 202660Medium
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the WWR contract address?
The World Water Reserve (WWR) contract on Base is 0x432111e7965110f8c790f98e92cd5b3c7fade093. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.
Is World Water Reserve a scam?
Quantum Audit's risk score for World Water Reserve is 60/100 (Medium risk) as of Oct 21, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Ownership: Retained; Mint: Mintable; Liquidity lock: Not locked; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.
Is WWR liquidity locked?
Liquidity lock: Not locked (as of Oct 21, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $50.8K.
Who holds WWR?
As of Oct 21, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 100.0% of the supply across 2,072 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of World Water Reserve?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page