Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Is WolfSafePoorPeople Safe?

On-chain security analysis — is it a scam or legit?

Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page →

WolfSafePoorPeople WSPP
0x46d5…d36f
BNB Chain
Not verifiedThis record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked today 1 audit on record
Executive SummaryAI Copilot

The WolfSafePoorPeople contract is an ERC-20 token with retained ownership. The owner has significant control over token distribution and individual balances through functions like `getAirdrop` and `tokenSale`. A high-severity issue was identified where the owner can directly manipulate user balances, alongside a low-severity issue related to potential rounding losses in token calculations during sales.

1 High1 Medium1 Low4 Informational
Volume 24h
$37.7K
Liquidity
$72.4K
Price
$0.0000000006
Token Age
5y
Top 10 Holders
87.0%

Security Findings

High

Owner can directly change token balances

CP-02The contract owner possesses the ability to directly modify token balances of any holder through the `getAirdrop` and `tokenSale` functions. This means the owner can increase or decrease anyone's token holdings without their consent, effectively burning or moving tokens out of any address they target.
IssueThe contract owner possesses the ability to directly modify token balances of any holder through the `getAirdrop` and `tokenSale` functions. This means the owner can increase or decrease anyone's token holdings without their consent, effectively burning or moving tokens out of any address they target.
FixToken holders should be aware that the contract owner possesses significant control over token distribution and individual balances. This centralized control introduces a high level of trust in the owner's actions. Consider if this level of control aligns with the project's decentralization goals.
StatusUnresolved
Medium

Liquidity not locked

QA-LIQUIDITY0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 94.7% is held, unlocked, by 10 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. No single one holds a majority: their exits thin the market rather than hand anyone the pool. This assessment covers the main pool, which holds 88% of the token's DEX liquidity; the other pools were not assessed.
Issue0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 94.7% is held, unlocked, by 10 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. No single one holds a majority: their exits thin the market rather than hand anyone the pool. This assessment covers the main pool, which holds 88% of the token's DEX liquidity; the other pools were not assessed.
FixCheck the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
StatusAcknowledged
Low

Potential for minor token loss due to calculation order

CD-01In the `tokenSale` function, the calculation for the number of tokens to be distributed involves division before multiplication (`_eth / sPrice` then `sChunk * _price`). This order can lead to rounding down, resulting in a small loss of tokens for the buyer, especially with small `_eth` values or high `sPrice`.
IssueIn the `tokenSale` function, the calculation for the number of tokens to be distributed involves division before multiplication (`_eth / sPrice` then `sChunk * _price`). This order can lead to rounding down, resulting in a small loss of tokens for the buyer, especially with small `_eth` values or high `sPrice`.
FixWhile the impact might be minor, it's generally safer to perform multiplication before division to preserve precision (`_eth * sChunk / sPrice`). This ensures that no fractional tokens are lost due to integer division.
StatusUnresolved
Info

Who holds the supply

QA-HOLDERSThe ten largest holders own 87.0% of supply. Of that, 77.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 0.4% in wallets, 8.7% in other contracts. 202,793 holders in total.
IssueThe ten largest holders own 87.0% of supply. Of that, 77.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 0.4% in wallets, 8.7% in other contracts. 202,793 holders in total.
FixWatch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

Listed, but not independently verified

QA-IDENTITYListed on CoinGecko as WolfSafePoorPeople (WSPP), market cap $6M, rank #1552. 202,793 holders.
IssueListed on CoinGecko as WolfSafePoorPeople (WSPP), market cap $6M, rank #1552. 202,793 holders.
FixMatch the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

The market for this token

QA-MARKETLiquidity $82K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $41K (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $41K (DexScreener, all pools).
IssueLiquidity $82K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $41K (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $41K (DexScreener, all pools).
FixSize any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

Asset class: Meme token

QA-PROFILEA community token whose value comes from attention rather than a product. Being a meme is not a risk in itself: it is scored on exactly the same contract and market facts as any other token. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: CoinGecko category: Meme. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: a single wallet (EOA). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $82K of DEX liquidity across 21 pools. Launch: 1962 days of market history.
IssueA community token whose value comes from attention rather than a product. Being a meme is not a risk in itself: it is scored on exactly the same contract and market facts as any other token. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: CoinGecko category: Meme. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: a single wallet (EOA). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $82K of DEX liquidity across 21 pools. Launch: 1962 days of market history.
FixExpect attention-driven volatility; the facts in this report say whether the contract itself can be used against holders.
StatusAcknowledged

Category Ratings

TechnicalMedium6/10

The contract implements standard ERC-20 token functionalities (7.1 Architecture). However, it grants the owner direct control over user balances via `getAirdrop` and `tokenSale` functions, which directly write to `balances` (7.2 Code Security, 7.3 Access Control). This centralized control allows the owner to arbitrarily modify token holdings. Additionally, the `tokenSale` function exhibits a division-before-multiplication pattern, which can lead to minor rounding losses for users.

GovernanceHigh3/10

The economic model is heavily centralized, with the owner having full control over airdrop and token sale parameters (7.4 Economic). The owner can set start/end blocks, amounts, and prices for both airdrops and sales using `startAirdrop` and `startSale`. Critically, the owner can also directly manipulate individual token balances, which poses a significant economic risk to token holders (7.5 Governance). The `clearETH` function allows the owner to withdraw all ETH held by the contract.

UpgradesMedium6/10

The contract is not designed with an upgrade mechanism (7.7 Upgrades), meaning its logic cannot be modified after deployment. This eliminates upgrade-related risks but also removes any flexibility for future improvements or bug fixes.

Security Checklist

Contract VerifiedPass
Ownership RenouncedFail
No Mint FunctionPass
Liquidity LockedFail
Not a ProxyPass
HoneypotNoneBuy Tax0.0%Sell Tax0.0%

Holder Composition

0.4% in wallets8.7% in contracts
Effective Concentration3.9%

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Liquidity Depth

Show 4 more pairsShow less

The 11 remaining pairs hold $287 between them and are not listed.

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

LP Distribution

Top-1 Unlocked Holder45.3%
Top-3 Unlocked78.3%

Key Addresses

Deployer
0xc55a…6e34
Unlocked LP Held By
0x1476…919d0x2f3a…11dc0x548d…bc1b0xd92b…59000xb790…f9880x7ea9…7e990x2175…a7330x351c…ca230xd273…38fc0xf244…9ac7

No privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.

What Raised This Score

  • Owner can change any holder's balance (seize or credit tokens)
  • Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool; this pool is 88% of DEX liquidity) — held by independent providers — market-depth risk
  • Code: Potential for minor token loss due to calculation order (Low, static analysis)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Related Audits

PancakeSwap Token (CAKE)High RiskSubsquid (SQD)High RiskBOBHigh RiskNIGHTHigh RiskAnoma (XAN)High RiskelizaOSHigh Risk

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of WolfSafePoorPeople?

Our AI-powered scanner gives you a deeper, real-time smart contract analysis — free, with every scoring factor shown.

Get Detailed Audit