Quantum Audit Logo

Is Veridia a Scam?

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page →

Veridia VERIDIA
0x255c…90cf
Ethereum
Not verifiedThis record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked today 1 audit on record New Launch · 6d old
DexScreener ↗
How is this score calculated? → Low Risk
Executive SummaryAI Copilot

The audit of the LaunchToken contract revealed a standard ERC-20 implementation with no custom privileged functions or complex transfer logic. No critical or high-severity vulnerabilities were identified during the analysis.

1 Medium6 Informational
! Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (6d old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.
Volume 24h
$800.5K
Liquidity
$88.6K
Price
$0.0005401
Token Age
6d
Top 10 Holders
32.7%

Security Findings

1 Med6 Info
Medium

Liquidity not locked

QA-LIQUIDITY0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 99.7% is held, unlocked, by 10 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. No single one holds a majority: their exits thin the market rather than hand anyone the pool. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them. This assessment covers the main pool, which holds 57% of the token's DEX liquidity; the other pools were not assessed.
Issue0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 99.7% is held, unlocked, by 10 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. No single one holds a majority: their exits thin the market rather than hand anyone the pool. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them. This assessment covers the main pool, which holds 57% of the token's DEX liquidity; the other pools were not assessed.
FixCheck the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

No issues identified in the reviewed source

I-01The verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint capability, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.
IssueThe verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint capability, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.
FixRe-check after any contract upgrade or ownership change, both of which can alter behaviour without changing this page.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

Who holds the supply

QA-HOLDERSThe ten largest holders own 32.7% of supply. Of that, 4.3% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 6.3% in wallets, 22.1% in other contracts. 718 holders in total.
IssueThe ten largest holders own 32.7% of supply. Of that, 4.3% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 6.3% in wallets, 22.1% in other contracts. 718 holders in total.
FixWatch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

Not listed by any independent source

QA-IDENTITY718 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Issue718 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
FixMatch the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

The market for this token

QA-MARKETLiquidity $155K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $995K (DexScreener, all pools).
IssueLiquidity $155K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $995K (DexScreener, all pools).
FixSize any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

Asset class: Project token

QA-PROFILEA token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $155K of DEX liquidity across 17 pools. Launch: 6 days of market history.
IssueA token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $155K of DEX liquidity across 17 pools. Launch: 6 days of market history.
FixCheck the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

Recently launched — 6 days of market history

QA-RECENTThe token's oldest DEX pool is 6 days old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
IssueThe token's oldest DEX pool is 6 days old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
FixRe-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
StatusAcknowledged

Category Ratings

TechnicalLow10/10

The LaunchToken contract implements a standard ERC-20 token. It includes all expected ERC-20 functions such as `transfer`, `transferFrom`, and `approve`. The static analysis (7.2 Code Security) confirmed no privileged functions or custom logic that could introduce vulnerabilities like reentrancy or integer overflows. The contract's architecture (7.1 Architecture) is straightforward, adhering to established token standards, which contributes to its low technical risk.

GovernanceLow9/10

The LaunchToken contract does not incorporate any governance mechanisms (7.5 Governance) or complex economic models (7.4 Economic). There are no privileged roles or functions that can alter token supply, freeze transfers, or modify core parameters. This design minimizes governance and economic risks, as control over the token's fundamental behavior is decentralized and immutable post-deployment.

UpgradesLow9/10

The LaunchToken contract is not implemented as a proxy (7.7 Upgrades) and therefore is not upgradeable. This eliminates risks associated with upgradeability, such as proxy misconfigurations or logic errors introduced during upgrades. The contract's immutability ensures its behavior remains consistent after deployment.

Security Checklist

3/5 checks passed
Contract VerifiedPass
Ownership Renounced?
No Mint FunctionPass
Liquidity LockedFail
Not a ProxyPass
HoneypotNoneBuy Tax0.0%Sell Tax0.0%

Holder Composition

32.7% in top 10
6.3% in wallets22.1% in contracts
Effective Concentration15.2%

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Liquidity Depth

$155.2K across 17 pairs
Uniswap v4WETHanalysed$88.6K57.1%Uniswap v4USDC$35.0K22.5%Uniswap v4USDC$7.8K5.0%Uniswap v4USDC$5.3K3.4%Uniswap v4USDC$4.6K2.9%Uniswap v4USDC$3.0K1.9%
Show 4 more pairsShow less
Uniswap v4USDC$2.8K1.8%Uniswap v4USDC$2.0K1.3%Uniswap v4USDC$1.5K0.9%Uniswap v4USDC$1.2K0.8%

The 7 remaining pairs hold $3.5K between them and are not listed.

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

LP Distribution

Top-1 Unlocked Holder25.1%
Top-3 Unlocked62.7%

Key Addresses

11 addresses
Deployer
0xa195…20fc
Unlocked LP Held By
0x7682…2b520x5004…4d870xc119…1fcd0x1342…e4a60x5833…63f50xa52c…5ebb0x3a9d…fa1f0xe03b…a09e0xa294…e6f00xed69…3cde

No privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.

What Raised This Score

1 factors
  • Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool; this pool is 57% of DEX liquidity) — held by independent providers — market-depth risk

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Related Audits

6 more on the record
4CHANLow RiskMOO DENG (MOODENG)Low RiskPAAL AI ($PAAL)Low RiskUnity Software (UNITY)Low RiskArtificial Pepe (AP)Low Riskzipcoin (ZC)Low Risk

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Veridia?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit