The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 token with additional governance and vesting features. The architecture relies heavily on a centralized owner role, which possesses significant control over token supply and transferability. While the code follows standard OpenZeppelin patterns, the centralization of power presents a notable risk to token holders.
Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is US Dividend Reserve (USDR) a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 token with additional governance and vesting features.
Read the full analysis- Owner can pause all transfers
- A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
- LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
- Liquidity < $50k
- Top-10 concentration > 30%
Exact factors
- Owner can pause all transfers
- A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
- LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
- Liquidity < $50k ($46,939 across 1 pairs — thin market)
- Top-10 concentration > 30% (100.0% total → 48.2% effective; 16.2% in EOAs, 80.1% in contracts; 3.7% burned, locked or in pools excluded)
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Oct 24Holders
as of audit · Oct 24, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking80.1%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell16.2%
- Burnedout of circulation3.7%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 24, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Oct 24The risk score reads depth across every pair.
Whether the LP tokens are locked could not be determined.
Security Findings
MediumCentralized Control Over Token Supply
The owner can call updateMintRate and release to mint new tokens, which increases the total supply and dilutes existing holders. This function is restricted to the owner, providing them with the ability to unilaterally impact the token's value.CP-01
Issue
The owner can call updateMintRate and release to mint new tokens, which increases the total supply and dilutes existing holders. This function is restricted to the owner, providing them with the ability to unilaterally impact the token's value.
Fix
Implement a time-lock on minting functions or transition ownership to a DAO to ensure that supply changes are subject to community consensus.
Status
Unresolved
MediumCentralized Control Over Transferability
The owner can use lockPool and unlockPool to toggle a switch that determines whether transfers are allowed. This allows the owner to freeze the movement of tokens at their discretion.CP-05
Issue
The owner can use lockPool and unlockPool to toggle a switch that determines whether transfers are allowed. This allows the owner to freeze the movement of tokens at their discretion.
Fix
Remove the ability to halt transfers or implement a multi-signature requirement for such drastic actions to prevent abuse by a single compromised account.
Status
Unresolved
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.7% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.1% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 2,115 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.7% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.1% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 2,115 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
2,115 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
2,115 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $47K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $116K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $47K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $116K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Its name presents it as a stable-value coin, yet it trades at $0.004602 — it does not hold a peg. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $47K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Its name presents it as a stable-value coin, yet it trades at $0.004602 — it does not hold a peg. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $47K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 24The contract utilizes well-audited OpenZeppelin libraries for ERC-20, Votes, and Permitting functionality. 7.1 Architecture is modular, and 7.2 Code Security is high due to the use of standard, battle-tested primitives. 7.3 Access Control is strictly enforced via Ownable, though the scope of administrative power is broad. 7.6 External dependencies are minimal and standard.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance risks are elevated due to the owner's ability to mint tokens and halt transfers. The owner can unilaterally dilute holders via updateMintRate or restrict liquidity via lockPool. These functions provide the owner with absolute control over the token's economic state, which is a significant trust requirement for users.
7.7 Upgrades are not implemented as this is a non-proxy contract. 7.8 Operations are straightforward, relying on standard EOA or multisig ownership. No complex upgrade logic exists to introduce hidden vulnerabilities.
To improve security, consider transitioning the ownership to a decentralized governance contract or a multi-signature wallet with a time-lock mechanism.
This would mitigate the risk of a single compromised key unilaterally altering the token's economic parameters or liquidity status. Additionally, implement event logging for all privileged state changes to ensure transparency for token holders. Providing a clear, public roadmap for the eventual renunciation of administrative powers would further increase trust in the protocol's long-term stability.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Oct 24, 202664Medium
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of US Dividend Reserve (USDR)?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page