The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation with added governance, voting, and vesting capabilities. The protocol relies on a centralized owner to manage inflation, pool locking, and vesting releases. While the code follows standard OpenZeppelin patterns, the high level of administrative privilege poses a significant trust requirement for token holders.
Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is United States Dividend Program a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation with added governance, voting, and vesting capabilities.
Read the full analysis- Owner can pause all transfers
- A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
- LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
- Top-10 concentration > 30%
Exact factors
- Owner can pause all transfers
- A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
- LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
- Top-10 concentration > 30% (100.0% total → 48.2% effective; 16.2% in EOAs, 80.0% in contracts; 3.8% burned, locked or in pools excluded)
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Oct 25Holders
as of audit · Oct 25, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking80.0%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell16.2%
- Burnedout of circulation3.8%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 25, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Oct 25The risk score reads depth across every pair.
Whether the LP tokens are locked could not be determined.
Security Findings
MediumCentralized Control Over Token Supply
The owner can call updateMintRate and release to mint new tokens, which increases the total supply and dilutes existing holders.CP-01
Issue
The owner can call updateMintRate and release to mint new tokens, which increases the total supply and dilutes existing holders.
Fix
Implement a timelock or transition ownership to a DAO to prevent unilateral supply changes.
Status
Unresolved
MediumCentralized Control Over Transfer Functionality
The owner can use lockPool and unlockPool to toggle a switch that controls whether transfers are allowed, effectively freezing user assets.CP-05
Issue
The owner can use lockPool and unlockPool to toggle a switch that controls whether transfers are allowed, effectively freezing user assets.
Fix
Remove the ability to pause transfers or implement a decentralized consensus mechanism for such actions.
Status
Unresolved
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 4,011 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 4,011 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
4,011 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
4,011 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $93K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $187K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $93K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $187K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Its name presents it as a stable-value coin, yet it trades at $0.05923 — it does not hold a peg. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $93K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Its name presents it as a stable-value coin, yet it trades at $0.05923 — it does not hold a peg. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $93K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 25The architecture utilizes robust OpenZeppelin libraries for ERC-20, voting, and permit functionality. Code security is high, adhering to modern Solidity standards and avoiding common pitfalls like reentrancy or overflow. 7.1 Architecture and 7.2 Code Security are well-implemented, though 7.3 Access Control is highly centralized.
Economic parameters are governed by the owner, including inflation rates and vesting schedules. 7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance items are centralized, allowing the owner to potentially dilute holders or restrict liquidity. 7.6 External dependencies are minimal and standard.
The contract is not a proxy and does not support upgrades. 7.7 Upgrades and 7.8 Operations are static, ensuring immutability of the core logic. This eliminates risks associated with malicious proxy implementation updates.
To improve security, consider transitioning the owner role to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract to mitigate single-point-of-failure risks.
Additionally, implementing a timelock on sensitive functions like updateMintRate would provide transparency and protection for token holders against sudden economic changes.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Oct 25, 202659Medium
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the USDP contract address?
The United States Dividend Program (USDP) contract on Base is 0x268f9736c6994213079ad0f2ff933c3257d4958f. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.
Is United States Dividend Program a scam?
Quantum Audit's risk score for United States Dividend Program is 59/100 (Medium risk) as of Oct 25, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Ownership: Retained; Mint: Mintable; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.
Who holds USDP?
As of Oct 25, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 100.0% of the supply across 4,011 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of United States Dividend Program?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page