Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation with additional governance and vesting features.
Read the full analysisEach factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 25, 2026
The risk score reads depth across every pair.
Whether the LP tokens are locked could not be determined.
The owner has the power to increase the total supply of tokens through the updateMintRate and release functions. This allows the owner to dilute the holdings of all existing token holders at their discretion, provided they stay within the 2% annual cap.
Implement a timelock on the updateMintRate function to ensure that any changes to the inflation rate are transparent and provide a window for community awareness.
Unresolved
The owner can use the lockPool and unlockPool functions to toggle the ability for tokens to be transferred. This gives the owner the power to effectively freeze liquidity or prevent users from moving their assets.
Restrict the use of pool locking to emergency scenarios only and consider adding a community-based veto or a multi-sig requirement to prevent unilateral control over user assets.
Unresolved
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 9 holders in total.
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Acknowledged
9 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Acknowledged
Liquidity $366K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $318K (DexScreener, all pools).
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Acknowledged
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Its name presents it as a stable-value coin, yet it trades at $0.7225 — it does not hold a peg. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $366K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Acknowledged
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Acknowledged
The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation with additional governance and vesting features. The protocol relies on a centralized owner to manage token inflation and liquidity pool access. While the code follows standard OpenZeppelin patterns, the high level of administrative control over supply and transferability introduces significant trust requirements for token holders.
The architecture utilizes standard OpenZeppelin libraries for ERC-20, Votes, and Permits, ensuring 7.1 Architecture and 7.2 Code Security standards are met. The implementation is clean and follows 7.8 Operations best practices for standard token behavior. However, 7.3 Access Control is heavily centralized, granting the owner broad authority over contract state. 7.6 External integrations are limited, reducing the attack surface for flash loan or oracle manipulation.
The protocol exhibits significant 7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance risks due to the owner's ability to mint tokens and restrict transfers. While inflation is capped at 2% annually, the owner can trigger these mints at will, impacting token value. The ability to lock/unlock pools provides a mechanism for emergency control but creates a single point of failure for liquidity access.
The contract is not a proxy, meaning 7.7 Upgrades are not supported. This provides immutability for the core logic, which is a strength for security. Users do not need to worry about logic changes, but they are locked into the current administrative rules.
To improve security, consider transitioning the owner role to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract (DAO) to mitigate the risk of a single compromised key.
Implementing a timelock on privileged functions like updateMintRate would provide transparency and allow the community to react to administrative actions. Ensure that the vesting schedule and inflation parameters are clearly documented for users. Regularly monitor the owner's activity to ensure that the centralized control is exercised in accordance with the protocol's stated economic policy.
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page
