Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is UDTF a Scam?

Base
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Oct 29, 2026 · 1 audit on recordNew Launch · 6h old
SummaryAI Copilot

The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 token with additional governance and vesting capabilities.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Owner can pause all transfers
  • A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
  • LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
  • Volume/Liquidity > 10×
  • Top-10 concentration > 30%
Exact factors
  • Owner can pause all transfers
  • A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
  • LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
  • Volume/Liquidity > 10× (14.8× — possible wash trading)
  • Top-10 concentration > 30% (100.0% total → 38.5% effective; 0.0% in EOAs, 96.2% in contracts; 3.8% burned, locked or in pools excluded)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (6h old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Oct 294 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipRetained
MintMintable
Liquidity lockUnknown
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Oct 29, 20267 holders
96.2%Contracts3.8%
96.2%Contracts3.8%
ContractsBurnedBubble area = share of supply
100.0%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking96.2%
  • Burnedout of circulation3.8%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads38.5%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 29, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Oct 29$69.8K

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensUnknown

Whether the LP tokens are locked could not be determined.

Analysed pool$69.8KShare of depth100.0%

Security Findings

2 Medium5 Info
Medium

Centralized Control Over Token Supply

The owner has the authority to call updateMintRate and release, which can increase the total supply of the token. This allows the owner to dilute the holdings of all existing token holders at their discretion.CP-01

Issue

The owner has the authority to call updateMintRate and release, which can increase the total supply of the token. This allows the owner to dilute the holdings of all existing token holders at their discretion.

Fix

Implement a timelock for minting operations or transition control to a decentralized governance mechanism to prevent arbitrary supply increases.

Status

Unresolved

Medium

Centralized Control Over Transferability

The owner can use the lockPool and unlockPool functions to enable or disable transfers for the pool. This grants the owner the power to effectively freeze liquidity or restrict user access to the token's utility.CP-05

Issue

The owner can use the lockPool and unlockPool functions to enable or disable transfers for the pool. This grants the owner the power to effectively freeze liquidity or restrict user access to the token's utility.

Fix

Restrict the ability to toggle transferability to a decentralized voting process or remove the functionality entirely to ensure token fungibility.

Status

Unresolved

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 0.0% in wallets, 96.2% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 7 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 0.0% in wallets, 96.2% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 7 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Not listed by any independent source

7 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

7 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $70K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $1.0M (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $70K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $1.0M (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $70K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $70K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.

Fix

Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Recently launched — less than a day of market history

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT

Issue

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.

Fix

Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 29
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 token with additional governance and vesting capabilities. The protocol relies on a centralized owner to manage inflation and liquidity pool access. While the code follows standard OpenZeppelin patterns, the high level of administrative control over token supply and transferability introduces significant trust requirements for token holders.

Technical8/10Low risk

The contract utilizes well-tested OpenZeppelin libraries for ERC-20, Votes, and Permit functionality. 7.1 Architecture is modular, and 7.2 Code Security is high due to standard implementation patterns. 7.3 Access Control is strictly enforced via Ownable, though it grants extensive power to the owner. 7.6 External dependencies are minimal and standard.

Governance3/10High risk

7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance aspects are heavily centralized. The owner has the ability to mint tokens and toggle transferability, which directly impacts the token's market value and liquidity. 7.8 Operations are dependent on the owner's discretion, creating a single point of failure for token holders.

Upgrades4/10Medium risk

7.7 Upgrades are not implemented; the contract is immutable. This eliminates risks associated with proxy logic errors or malicious implementation updates. The logic remains fixed as deployed.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

To improve security and trust, consider transitioning ownership to a decentralized multi-signature wallet or a DAO governance contract.

This would mitigate the risk of a single compromised owner key affecting token supply or transferability. Additionally, implement a timelock mechanism for all privileged functions, such as updateMintRate and lockPool. This would provide the community with a window to react to administrative changes, significantly reducing the impact of potential owner account compromise.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypeToken
NetworkBase
Token age6h
Contract0x3fcf…54a1
Deployer0x0dca…ad1c
Badge for your website
UDTF security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Oct 29, 202657Medium

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of UDTF?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified