The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 token with additional governance and vesting capabilities. The architecture relies heavily on a centralized owner account, which possesses significant control over token supply and transferability. While the code follows standard OpenZeppelin patterns, the centralization of power presents a notable risk to token holders.
Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is UDTF a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 token with additional governance and vesting capabilities.
Read the full analysis- Owner can pause all transfers
- A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
- LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
- Top-10 concentration > 30%
Exact factors
- Owner can pause all transfers
- A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
- LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
- Top-10 concentration > 30% (100.0% total → 48.2% effective; 16.2% in EOAs, 80.0% in contracts; 3.8% burned, locked or in pools excluded)
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Oct 27Holders
as of audit · Oct 27, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking80.0%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell16.2%
- Burnedout of circulation3.8%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 27, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Oct 27The risk score reads depth across every pair.
Whether the LP tokens are locked could not be determined.
Security Findings
MediumCentralized Minting Control
The owner has the authority to mint new tokens via the updateMintRate and release functions, which can dilute the value of existing holdings.CP-01
Issue
The owner has the authority to mint new tokens via the updateMintRate and release functions, which can dilute the value of existing holdings.
Fix
Implement a timelock or transition ownership to a DAO to ensure minting events are transparent and community-approved.
Status
Unresolved
MediumCentralized Transfer Control
The owner can use the lockPool and unlockPool functions to enable or disable token transfers, effectively freezing user assets at their discretion.CP-05
Issue
The owner can use the lockPool and unlockPool functions to enable or disable token transfers, effectively freezing user assets at their discretion.
Fix
Remove the ability to arbitrarily lock transfers or restrict this functionality to emergency scenarios with a mandatory delay.
Status
Unresolved
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. 27 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. 27 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
27 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
27 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $863K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $2.1M (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $863K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $2.1M (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $863K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $863K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 27The contract utilizes well-tested OpenZeppelin libraries for ERC-20 and governance features. 7.1 Architecture is modular, and 7.2 Code Security is high due to the use of standard, audited base contracts. However, 7.3 Access Control is highly centralized, allowing the owner to modify core token mechanics at will.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance aspects are dominated by the owner's ability to mint tokens and halt transfers. While 7.6 External dependencies are minimal, the economic model is subject to administrative intervention. This creates a trust-based environment rather than a trustless one.
7.7 Upgrades are not supported as this is a standard non-proxy contract. 7.8 Operations are straightforward, though the owner's ability to lock pools and update mint rates requires high operational security standards to prevent abuse.
It is recommended to transition the ownership of the contract to a decentralized governance mechanism, such as a Multi-Sig wallet or a DAO, to mitigate the risks associated with a single point of failure.
Additionally, implementing a timelock on sensitive functions like updateMintRate would provide transparency and allow the community to react to administrative changes.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Oct 27, 202658Medium
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the UDTF contract address?
The UDTF contract on Base is 0xf4a4e2154081683cd128a80f1060105e0c78f510. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.
Is UDTF a scam?
Quantum Audit's risk score for UDTF is 58/100 (Medium risk) as of Oct 27, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Ownership: Retained; Mint: Mintable; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.
Who holds UDTF?
As of Oct 27, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 100.0% of the supply across 27 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of UDTF?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified