Is The Black Table (MENSA) Safe? Smart Contract Security Analysis

The Black Table MENSA

CFPkPq…pump

Solana Not verifiedLast checked 3d ago 1 audit on record

DexScreener ↗

78 / 100

Critical Risk

Executive SummaryAI Copilot

This SPL Token Mint has critical risks identified by a third-party risk registry due to single holder ownership. While mint and freeze authorities are revoked, this external signal indicates significant centralization risk. Holder distribution data from chain-native RPC was unavailable, and this report relies on the third-party registry's assessment.

1 Critical

Volume 24h

$84.4K

Liquidity

$112.1K

Price

$0.0006238

Token Age

1mo

Top 10 Holders

55.9%

Security Findings

1 Crit

Critical

Flagged High-Risk by Third-Party Registry

C-01An independent third-party risk registry identifies "Single holder ownership" as a significant risk signal for this token.

IssueAn independent third-party risk registry identifies "Single holder ownership" as a significant risk signal for this token.

FixDo not interact with this token.

StatusUnresolved

Category Ratings

TechnicalMedium4/10

The token is an SPL Token-2022 mint with its mint and freeze authorities successfully revoked, indicating a fixed supply and unfreezable accounts. No transfer hook or permanent delegate is configured, and default account state is not frozen. The token's metadata is immutable, and balance mutability is not enabled, which are positive technical controls.

GovernanceHigh1/10

DEX liquidity is $220,654 with a 24-hour volume of $357,121, resulting in a normal Volume/Liquidity Ratio of 1.62. The pair has been active for 31 days, providing some track record. However, a third-party risk registry signals 'Single holder ownership', indicating extreme centralization and potential for market manipulation or rug pull.

UpgradesMedium4/10

The token mint has both its mint and freeze authorities revoked, preventing further supply changes or account freezing. It utilizes the spl-token-2022 program but does not have a transfer hook or default frozen account state. Metadata is immutable, ensuring branding cannot be altered post-launch.

Security Checklist

1/4 checks passed

Contract VerifiedFail

No Mint Function?

Liquidity LockedFail

Not a ProxyPass

Liquidity Depth

$119.7K across 5 pairs

PumpswapSOLanalysed$112.1K Meteora DLMMSOL$6.7K Meteora DYN2ANSEM$912 Meteora DYN2ANSEM$23 Meteora DYN2CSR$7

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

What Raised This Score

6 factors

Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
Contract source NOT verified
Top-10 concentration > 50% (55.9% total → 55.9% effective; 55.9% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts — heavy)
Liquidity NOT locked (owner can withdraw — rug-pull risk)
1 Critical finding(s) from audit

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Is The Black Table Safe?