Is Bull Safe? Smart Contract Security Analysis

Security Findings

1 Info

Info

No code-level findings — an SPL mint exposes no auditable program source

I-01This token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.

IssueThis token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.

FixRead the risk score breakdown below as the substance of this audit. For a code-level review, the token would need an accompanying verified program.

StatusAcknowledged

Category Ratings

TechnicalMedium6/10

The Bull token operates under the `spl-token` program. Both the mint authority and freeze authority have been revoked (None), ensuring a fixed supply and immutability of account states. The token does not utilize advanced Token-2022 extensions such as permanent delegates, transfer hooks, or default frozen accounts, nor are balance mutability features present (`balance_mutable: False`).

GovernanceHigh1/10

The token exhibits healthy liquidity at $69,308 USD and a normal 24-hour volume to liquidity ratio of 1.47, suggesting organic trading activity. The pair has been active for 109 days, providing a reasonable track record. Holder concentration data was unavailable, preventing a full assessment of potential whale-related market volatility.

UpgradesMedium5/10

The mint authority and freeze authority are both revoked (None), meaning the token's supply and account freeze capabilities are immutable. Metadata is also not mutable (`metadata_mutable: False`), ensuring the token's name, symbol, and image cannot be changed post-launch. No upgradable transfer fees or transfer hooks are configured (`transfer_fee_upgradable: False`, `transfer_hook_upgradable: False`).

Security Checklist

1/4 checks passed

Contract VerifiedFail

No Mint Function?

Liquidity LockedFail

Not a ProxyPass

Liquidity Depth

$63.7K across 6 pairs

PumpswapSOLanalysed$63.3K Meteora DLMMSOL$369 Meteora DYN2CSR$9 Orca wpSOL$4

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

What Raised This Score

5 factors

Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
Contract source NOT verified
Top-10 concentration > 50% (50.2% total → 50.2% effective; 50.2% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts — heavy)
Liquidity NOT locked (owner can withdraw — rug-pull risk)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Is Bull Safe?