The contract at the provided address is not verified on the Base block explorer. Consequently, the source code is unavailable for inspection, preventing any analysis of logic, security vulnerabilities, or backdoors. Users should exercise extreme caution as the lack of transparency is a significant indicator of potential malicious intent or negligence.
Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is Surplus Intelligence a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The contract at the provided address is not verified on the Base block explorer.
Read the full analysis- Mint capability UNKNOWN
- Ownership status UNKNOWN
- LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
- Liquidity < $50k
- Top-10 concentration > 70%
- Contract source not verified — its logic cannot be read
Exact factors
- Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
- Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
- LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
- Liquidity < $50k ($42,943 across 1 pairs — thin market)
- Top-10 concentration > 70% (70.3% total → 70.3% effective; 70.3% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts; deployer/owner holds 42.5%)
- Contract source NOT verified — its logic cannot be read
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Oct 27Holders
as of audit · Oct 27, 2026- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell70.3%
- Everyone else350 holders29.7%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 27, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Oct 27The risk score reads depth across every pair.
Whether the LP tokens are locked could not be determined.
Security Findings
CriticalUnverified Contract Source Code
The contract source code is not published on the block explorer, making it impossible to audit for vulnerabilities, backdoors, or malicious logic.C-01
Issue
The contract source code is not published on the block explorer, making it impossible to audit for vulnerabilities, backdoors, or malicious logic.
Fix
Verify the contract source code on the block explorer to allow for public transparency and security assessment.
Status
Unresolved
HighWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 70.3% of supply. What remains: 70.3% in wallets, 0.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 42.5%. A holder that also controls the contract can sell into its own liquidity. 360 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 70.3% of supply. What remains: 70.3% in wallets, 0.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 42.5%. A holder that also controls the contract can sell into its own liquidity. 360 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
360 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
360 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $43K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $149K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $43K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $149K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $43K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $43K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 277.1 Architecture: Unknown. 7.2 Code Security: Unverifiable. 7.3 Access Control: Unverifiable. The absence of source code makes it impossible to assess the technical integrity of the contract. No security guarantees can be provided for this deployment.
7.4 Economic: Unverifiable. 7.5 Governance: Unverifiable. 7.6 External: Unverifiable. Without access to the contract logic, it is impossible to determine if there are hidden minting functions, tax mechanisms, or liquidity rug-pull vectors.
7.7 Upgrades: Unverifiable. 7.8 Operations: Unverifiable. It is unknown if the contract utilizes a proxy pattern or if the owner has the ability to modify contract logic post-deployment.
Do not interact with this contract. The lack of source code verification is a major red flag that prevents any form of security due diligence.
Without verified code, there is no way to ensure the safety of your funds or the legitimacy of the token's economic model.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Oct 27, 202678High
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Surplus Intelligence?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified