Is SUPER AGENTOS (SAGENT) Safe? Smart Contract Security Analysis

Security Findings

1 Info

Info

No code-level findings — an SPL mint exposes no auditable program source

I-01This token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.

IssueThis token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.

FixRead the risk score breakdown below as the substance of this audit. For a code-level review, the token would need an accompanying verified program.

StatusAcknowledged

Category Ratings

TechnicalMedium6/10

The SUPER AGENTOS (sAGENT) token is implemented using the modern spl-token-2022 program, indicating a robust and feature-rich foundation. Both the Mint Authority and Freeze Authority have been permanently revoked, ensuring that no single entity can mint new tokens or freeze existing holder accounts. The token does not utilize a Transfer Hook, meaning transfers are straightforward and not subject to external program logic.

GovernanceHigh1/10

The token exhibits a healthy distribution among its holders, with the top 10 accounts holding only 32.21% of the total supply, which is below common concentration thresholds for concern. Liquidity for sAGENT is $44,946, providing a reasonable base for trading. The 24-hour volume to liquidity ratio is 3.01, indicating normal trading activity without signs of artificial inflation.

UpgradesMedium5/10

The sAGENT token demonstrates a strong commitment to immutability, as both the Mint Authority and Freeze Authority are revoked, preventing any future changes to the token supply or account freeze status. Key Token-2022 extensions like transfer hook and transfer fee are not present, and their upgradability flags are false, reinforcing stability. Furthermore, the token's metadata is immutable, ensuring that its name, symbol, and image cannot be altered post-launch.

Security Checklist

1/4 checks passed

Contract VerifiedFail

No Mint Function?

Liquidity LockedFail

Not a ProxyPass

HoneypotNoneBuy Tax0.0%Sell Tax0.0%

Liquidity Depth

$37.0K across 2 pairs

PumpswapSOLanalysed$36.8K Meteora DLMMSOL$151

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

What Raised This Score

6 factors

Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
Contract source NOT verified
Top-10 concentration > 30% (33.9% total → 33.9% effective; 33.9% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts — moderate)
Liquidity NOT locked (owner can withdraw — rug-pull risk)
Liquidity < $50k ($36,989 across 2 pairs — thin market)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Is SUPER AGENTOS Safe?