Is ████████ (REDACTED) Safe? Smart Contract Security Analysis

Security Findings

1 Info

Info

No code-level findings — an SPL mint exposes no auditable program source

I-01This token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.

IssueThis token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.

FixRead the risk score breakdown below as the substance of this audit. For a code-level review, the token would need an accompanying verified program.

StatusAcknowledged

Category Ratings

TechnicalMedium6/10

The token mint operates under the classic `spl-token` program. Both the mint authority and freeze authority are revoked, ensuring that no new tokens can be minted and no existing accounts can be frozen. The total supply is fixed at 996,237,996.255151226 tokens with 9 decimals. No Token-2022 extensions such as transfer hooks or permanent delegates are active.

GovernanceHigh2/10

The token exhibits healthy liquidity with $260,589 USD available on DEXs. The 24-hour volume of $650,512 USD results in a normal Volume/Liquidity Ratio of 2.50, suggesting organic trading activity rather than wash trading. The pair has been active for 25 days, providing a reasonable track record. Holder concentration data was not available for analysis.

UpgradesMedium5/10

The mint authority and freeze authority are both revoked, preventing any future changes to the token's supply or freeze capabilities. As a classic `spl-token` program, it does not utilize Token-2022 extensions that could introduce mutable features like permanent delegates or transfer hooks. Metadata mutability status was not explicitly provided, but typically, classic SPL tokens have immutable metadata once initialized.

Security Checklist

1/4 checks passed

Contract VerifiedFail

No Mint Function?

Liquidity LockedFail

Not a ProxyPass

HoneypotNoneBuy Tax0.0%Sell Tax0.0%

Liquidity Depth

$80.1K across 9 pairs

Raydium CLMMZECanalysed$73.3K Meteora DLMMSOL$4.3K Meteora DLMMSOL$1.4K Meteora DLMMTripleT$484 Meteora DLMMSOL$453 Meteora DYN2USDC$224

Show 1 more pairShow less

Meteora DYN2SOL$10

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

What Raised This Score

6 factors

Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
Contract source NOT verified
Top-10 concentration > 30% (39.1% total → 39.1% effective; 39.1% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts — moderate)
Liquidity NOT locked (owner can withdraw — rug-pull risk)
Token age < 30 days (still settling)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Is ████████ Safe?