Solana · Smart Contract Security · Updated Jul 24, 2026

Is Kiyomasa Safe? 清正

On-chain security analysis — is it a scam or legit?

Contract ANP1wJ…pump DexScreener ↗

66 / 100

High Risk How is this score calculated? →

Volume 24h

$1.9K

Liquidity

$16.4K

Price

$0.00002417

Token Age

2mo

Top 10 Holders

57.1%

Security Checklist

1/5 checks passed

Contract VerifiedFail

Ownership RenouncedUnknown

No Mint FunctionUnknown

Liquidity LockedFail

Not a ProxyPass

Audit History

2 audits on record

Jul 2366

Every audit run adds a dated snapshot — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Audit Summary

The Kiyomasa SPL Token Mint is configured with no active mint or freeze authorities, indicating a fixed supply and immutable account states. No high-risk flags were reported by third-party registries, and the token does not utilize potentially risky Token-2022 extensions like transfer hooks or default frozen accounts. Holder distribution data was unavailable, preventing a full assessment of supply concentration.

Final Recommendation: Holders should monitor on-chain for any changes to the token's configuration, although current settings indicate immutability. Verify the token's liquidity and trading volume on DEXs before making significant trades, especially given the lack of holder distribution data. Confirm that the mint and freeze authorities remain revoked to ensure the token's fixed supply and unfreezable nature.

Category Ratings

TechnicalMedium

6/10

The Kiyomasa token operates on the spl-token-2022 program. Both the mint authority and freeze authority are revoked, ensuring no new tokens can be minted and no accounts can be frozen. The token does not implement a transfer hook or default account state frozen. Furthermore, external security signal

GovernanceHigh

1/10

The token exhibits moderate liquidity at $18,423 USD, with a 24-hour volume of $5,481 USD. The pair has been active for 111 days, providing a reasonable track record. The Volume/Liquidity Ratio is 0.30, which is considered normal and does not suggest artificial trading. However, holder concentration

UpgradesMedium

5/10

The token's configuration is highly immutable, as both the mint and freeze authorities have been revoked. No Token-2022 extensions that would allow for future modifications, such as transfer hook upgradability or transfer fee upgradability, are active. Additionally, the token's metadata is

What Raised This Score

6 factors

Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
Contract source NOT verified
Top-10 concentration > 50% (57.1% total → 57.1% effective; 57.1% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts — heavy)
Liquidity NOT locked (owner can withdraw — rug-pull risk)
Liquidity < $50k ($16,437 across 1 pairs — thin market)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Kiyomasa a scam?

Based on available data, Kiyomasa (清正) exhibits characteristics often associated with high-risk projects, such as an unverified contract and unlocked liquidity, which are concerning. However, ownership has been renounced and no mint function exists, mitigating certain developer-controlled rug pull vectors. While these red flags necessitate extreme caution and vigilance from investors, we cannot definitively label it a scam based solely on the provided data.

Is Kiyomasa safe to buy?

Kiyomasa (清正) carries significant security risks that suggest it is not a safe investment. The contract is unverified, preventing public code review and potential hidden vulnerabilities. Crucially, liquidity is not locked, meaning the funds enabling trading can be removed by liquidity providers, risking a 'rug pull' and rendering tokens untradable. These fundamental issues, alongside some holder concentration, indicate a high-risk environment for potential buyers.

Has Kiyomasa been audited?

There is no information indicating Kiyomasa (清正) has undergone a formal security audit. Moreover, the contract is explicitly listed as 'False' for verification. This means its source code is not publicly available or confirmed to match the deployed bytecode on the blockchain. This lack of transparency and an independent audit makes it challenging to assess the contract's integrity and security, posing a significant risk.