Is OnlyMarms Safe? Smart Contract Security Analysis

Security Findings

1 Info

Info

No code-level findings — an SPL mint exposes no auditable program source

I-01This token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.

IssueThis token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.

FixRead the risk score breakdown below as the substance of this audit. For a code-level review, the token would need an accompanying verified program.

StatusAcknowledged

Category Ratings

TechnicalMedium6/10

The OnlyMarms token is an SPL Token-2022 mint. Both the mint authority and freeze authority have been revoked, ensuring no new tokens can be minted and no existing accounts can be frozen. No transfer hook is active, and the default account state is not frozen, indicating standard transfer behavior. The token's balance and metadata are immutable, as confirmed by the on-chain security registry.

GovernanceHigh1/10

The token has a liquidity of $114,592 USD, which is above the very low liquidity threshold. The 24-hour volume to liquidity ratio is 4.12, which is considered normal and does not suggest wash trading. The DEX pair has been active for 7 days. Holder concentration data was unavailable, preventing an assessment of whale risk.

UpgradesMedium5/10

The mint authority and freeze authority are both revoked, meaning the token's supply and account freeze status cannot be altered. No Token-2022 extensions like permanent delegate or transfer hook are configured. The token's metadata is immutable, preventing changes to its name, symbol, or image post-launch.

Security Checklist

1/4 checks passed

Contract VerifiedFail

No Mint Function?

Liquidity LockedFail

Not a ProxyPass

Liquidity Depth

$48.5K across 2 pairs

PumpswapSOLanalysed$47.0K Meteora DLMMSOL$1.5K

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

What Raised This Score

7 factors

Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
Contract source NOT verified
Top-10 concentration > 30% (39.4% total → 39.4% effective; 39.4% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts — moderate)
Liquidity NOT locked (owner can withdraw — rug-pull risk)
Liquidity < $50k ($48,520 across 2 pairs — thin market)
Token age < 30 days (still settling)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Is OnlyMarms Safe?