Solana · Smart Contract Security · Updated Jul 24, 2026

Is Make Britain Great Again Safe? MBGA

On-chain security analysis — is it a scam or legit?

Contract dFybjf…pump DexScreener ↗

68 / 100

High Risk How is this score calculated? →

Volume 24h

$6.8K

Liquidity

$24.1K

Price

$0.00006329

Token Age

16d

Top 10 Holders

50.7%

Security Checklist

1/5 checks passed

Contract VerifiedFail

Ownership RenouncedUnknown

No Mint FunctionUnknown

Liquidity LockedFail

Not a ProxyPass

Audit History

2 audits on record

Jul 2368

Every audit run adds a dated snapshot — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Audit Summary

The Make Britain Great Again (MBGA) token mint is configured with revoked mint and freeze authorities, indicating a fixed supply and unfreezable accounts. No critical or high-risk issues were identified based on available on-chain data and third-party registries. Holder concentration data was unavailable for analysis, preventing a full assessment of distribution risk.

Final Recommendation: Before interacting with this token, verify on-chain that the mint and freeze authorities remain revoked. Monitor DEX liquidity and volume for any significant changes, as low liquidity can lead to high slippage. Be aware that holder distribution data was not available, so a full assessment of whale risk is not possible without further off-chain analysis.

Category Ratings

TechnicalMedium

6/10

The MBGA token is an SPL Token-2022 mint. Both the mint authority and freeze authority are revoked, ensuring no new tokens can be minted and no accounts can be frozen. It does not utilize a transfer hook, permanent delegate, or default frozen account state, indicating standard token transfer behavio

GovernanceHigh

1/10

The token exhibits moderate liquidity at $23,163 USD, with a healthy 24-hour volume to liquidity ratio of 0.23, suggesting organic trading activity. The DEX pair has been active for 37 days, providing some track record. Holder concentration data was unavailable, preventing an assessment of supply di

UpgradesMedium

5/10

The mint authority and freeze authority are both revoked, meaning the token's supply and account freeze capabilities are permanently fixed and cannot be altered. The token does not have upgradable transfer fees or transfer hooks. Additionally, the token's metadata is immutable, ensuring it

What Raised This Score

7 factors

Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
Contract source NOT verified
Top-10 concentration > 50% (50.7% total → 50.7% effective; 50.7% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts — heavy)
Liquidity NOT locked (owner can withdraw — rug-pull risk)
Liquidity < $50k ($24,140 across 1 pairs — thin market)
Token age < 30 days (still settling)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Make Britain Great Again a scam?

Based on the available data, we cannot definitively label MBGA as a scam. However, the unverified contract and unlocked liquidity create a high-risk environment conducive to malicious activity, including potential rug pulls. These factors, alongside a Medium Risk score of 36/100, indicate significant caution is warranted when evaluating its legitimacy.

Is Make Britain Great Again safe to buy?

Investing in Make Britain Great Again carries substantial risks and is not considered safe due to several critical factors. The contract remains unverified, preventing public code review, and its liquidity is not locked, exposing investors to potential rug pulls. Furthermore, a significant 47.0% of the supply is concentrated among the top 10 holders. These issues contribute to its Medium Risk score of 36/100.

Has Make Britain Great Again been audited?

Information provided indicates the Make Britain Great Again contract is not verified. This means the underlying code is not publicly available or confirmed to match any published source code, which is a prerequisite for a meaningful security audit. Without verification, a comprehensive security assessment cannot definitively confirm the code's integrity or safety.