Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
The contract at the provided address is not verified on the Base block explorer.
Read the full analysisEach factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 27, 2026
The risk score reads depth across every pair.
Whether the LP tokens are locked could not be determined.
The contract source code is not published on the block explorer, rendering it impossible to audit for security vulnerabilities or malicious backdoors.
Verify the contract source code on the block explorer immediately to provide transparency to users and allow for security assessments.
Unresolved
The ten largest holders own 37.9% of supply. What remains: 37.9% in wallets, 0.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 15.1%. 664 holders in total.
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Acknowledged
664 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Acknowledged
Liquidity $142K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $997K (DexScreener, all pools).
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Acknowledged
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $142K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Acknowledged
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Acknowledged
The contract at the provided address is not verified on the Base block explorer. Consequently, the source code is unavailable for inspection, preventing any technical analysis of its logic, security, or functionality. Investors should exercise extreme caution as unverified contracts may contain malicious backdoors, honeypot mechanisms, or lack basic security safeguards.
The technical architecture cannot be evaluated due to the lack of verified source code. 7.1 Architecture, 7.2 Code Security, 7.3 Access Control, and 7.6 External interactions remain entirely opaque. Without bytecode analysis, it is impossible to verify the presence of standard security patterns or the absence of malicious logic.
Economic and governance parameters are hidden from public view. 7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance metrics cannot be assessed, meaning potential risks like minting backdoors or centralized control cannot be identified. Users have no visibility into the tokenomics or administrative privileges governing the contract.
The upgradeability status (7.7 Upgrades) is unknown as the contract is not verified. It is impossible to determine if the contract uses a proxy pattern or if the logic can be altered by an owner. 7.8 Operations are equally opaque, posing a significant risk to long-term asset safety.
Do not interact with this contract. Without verified source code, there is no assurance that the contract functions as intended or that it is free from malicious intent.
Prior to any engagement, verify the contract on the block explorer and ensure a third-party security audit has been conducted. If the developers refuse to verify the code, treat the asset as a high-risk or potentially fraudulent project.
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
The one life, its worth an attempt (WORTH) contract on Base is 0x25e1c201a5e92a59bc6a89d690e8267d6b06631f. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.
Quantum Audit's risk score for one life, its worth an attempt is 62/100 (Medium risk) as of Oct 27, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Not verified; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.
As of Oct 27, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 37.9% of the supply across 664 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified
