Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation with additional governance, voting, and vesting capabilities.
Read the full analysisEach factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 20, 2026
The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.
The owner has the ability to call updateMintRate and release, which can increase the total supply of the token. This allows the owner to dilute the holdings of all existing token holders at their discretion.
Implement a time-lock for minting operations or transition ownership to a decentralized governance model to prevent unilateral supply changes.
Unresolved
The owner can use lockPool and unlockPool to enable or disable token transfers. This gives the owner the power to effectively freeze user assets or halt trading activity.
Remove the ability to pause transfers or restrict this functionality to emergency scenarios governed by a multi-signature or time-locked process.
Unresolved
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.1% in wallets, 80.2% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.1%. 2,012 holders in total.
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Acknowledged
2,012 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Acknowledged
Liquidity $51K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $31K (DexScreener, all pools).
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Acknowledged
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $51K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Acknowledged
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Acknowledged
The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation with additional governance, voting, and vesting capabilities. The protocol utilizes a centralized ownership model where the owner holds significant power over token supply and transferability. While the code follows standard OpenZeppelin patterns, the centralization of administrative functions poses a notable risk to token holders.
The contract architecture leverages well-tested OpenZeppelin libraries for ERC-20, voting, and permit functionality. 7.1 Architecture and 7.2 Code Security are robust, utilizing standard patterns for token management. 7.3 Access Control is correctly implemented using Ownable, though the scope of administrative power is broad. 7.6 External dependencies are limited to standard libraries, reducing the attack surface.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance aspects are heavily centralized under the owner. The owner has the ability to mint tokens and halt transfers, which directly impacts 7.4 Economic stability. While 7.8 Operations are simplified by these controls, they create a single point of failure for token holders. Governance is currently limited to the owner's discretion rather than a decentralized DAO.
7.7 Upgrades are not supported as the contract is not a proxy. The logic is immutable, which provides certainty to users regarding the contract's behavior. This eliminates risks associated with malicious or accidental logic updates.
To improve security, consider transitioning the ownership to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract to mitigate the risks associated with a single point of failure.
Additionally, implementing a time-lock mechanism for sensitive functions like updateMintRate would provide transparency and protection against sudden administrative actions. Users should be aware that the owner has the technical capability to pause transfers and increase the total supply. We recommend that the project team publishes a clear policy regarding the use of these privileged functions to build trust with the community.
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page
