The DERC20 contract implements a standard ERC-20 token integrated with OpenZeppelin voting, permit, and vesting extensions on Base. The implementation follows modern Solidity patterns with strict bounds on inflation minting, but retains centralized privileged controls over liquidity pool interactions and token supply expansion.
Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is NOTF a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The DERC20 contract implements a standard ERC-20 token integrated with OpenZeppelin voting, permit, and vesting extensions on Base.
Read the full analysis- Owner can pause all transfers
- A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
- LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
- Top-10 concentration > 30%
Exact factors
- Owner can pause all transfers
- A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
- LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
- Top-10 concentration > 30% (100.0% total → 48.2% effective; 16.2% in EOAs, 80.0% in contracts; 3.8% burned, locked or in pools excluded)
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Oct 25Holders
as of audit · Oct 25, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking80.0%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell16.2%
- Burnedout of circulation3.8%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 25, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Oct 25The risk score reads depth across every pair.
Whether the LP tokens are locked could not be determined.
Security Findings
MediumPrivileged Token Minting Dilutes Existing Holders
The contract owner possesses administrative authority to increase the circulating token supply through the updateMintRate(uint256) and release() functions. When updateMintRate is called, it triggers mintInflation() if an active yearly period has elapsed, diluting the relative balance and voting weight of existing token holders.CP-01
Issue
The contract owner possesses administrative authority to increase the circulating token supply through the updateMintRate(uint256) and release() functions. When updateMintRate is called, it triggers mintInflation() if an active yearly period has elapsed, diluting the relative balance and voting weight of existing token holders.
Fix
Enforce transparent minting schedules governed by a timelock or decentralized governance vote rather than direct owner invocation, and consider lowering or permanently capping maximum emission bounds.
Status
Unresolved
MediumOwner Controlled Switch Can Restrict Pool Transfers
The contract owner controls liquidity access via lockPool(address) and unlockPool(), which alter the isPoolUnlocked flag and modify the registered pool address. This switch can be utilized to block or restrict transfers involving designated decentralized exchange liquidity pools at the owner's discretion.CP-05
Issue
The contract owner controls liquidity access via lockPool(address) and unlockPool(), which alter the isPoolUnlocked flag and modify the registered pool address. This switch can be utilized to block or restrict transfers involving designated decentralized exchange liquidity pools at the owner's discretion.
Fix
Remove the arbitrary pool locking switch after initial launch or enforce an irreversible one-way unlock to ensure permanent and unhampered trading access for token holders.
Status
Unresolved
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 10,005 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 10,005 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
10,005 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
10,005 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $173K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $364K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $173K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $364K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $173K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $173K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 25Regarding 7.1 Architecture and 7.2 Code Security, the contract demonstrates robust structure by inheriting established OpenZeppelin contracts such as ERC20Votes, ERC20Permit, and Ownable using Solidity 0.8.26 with built-in arithmetic protection. In terms of 7.6 External integrations, external interfaces adhere strictly to ERC-20 standards with nonces and EIP-712 support. However, regarding 7.3 Access Control, critical functionality remains strictly gated behind the owner address without multi-step transition flows, exemplified by direct single-caller execution in lockPool and updateMintRate.
Under 7.4 Economic considerations, the contract provides strong economic guardrails by capping the annual inflation rate with MAX_YEARLY_MINT_RATE_WAD in updateMintRate to prevent arbitrary hyperinflation. Under 7.5 Governance and 7.8 Operations, voting modules (IERC5805, IVotes) facilitate token-based governance participation. However, operational discretion permits the owner to unilaterally alter the mint rate and trigger inflation minting or disable pool interactions, creating centralized economic intervention risks for holders.
Under 7.7 Upgrades, the contract is deployed as an immutable non-proxy implementation on Base, eliminating common proxy storage collision and implementation hijacking risks. The codebase benefits from immutability as core business logic cannot be arbitrarily substituted underneath token holders. Nonetheless, operational parameters such as pool addresses and tokenURI remain mutable via direct owner invocations.
The protocol should transition administrative authority from a single owner to a timelocked multi-signature wallet or decentralized governance structure to mitigate single point of failure risks.
Restricting discretionary pool locking and enforcing explicit event emissions on all administrative state changes will significantly enhance transparency. Additionally, consider implementing immutable bounds or programmatic schedules for pool locking mechanisms to guarantee unhindered liquidity and trading freedom for all market participants.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Oct 25, 202657Medium
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the NOTF contract address?
The NOTF contract on Base is 0xe2cc332525834e89649278e55c3e5ad63b14541d. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.
Is NOTF a scam?
Quantum Audit's risk score for NOTF is 57/100 (Medium risk) as of Oct 25, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Ownership: Retained; Mint: Mintable; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.
Who holds NOTF?
As of Oct 25, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 100.0% of the supply across 10,005 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of NOTF?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page