Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is NOTF a Scam?

Base
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Oct 25, 2026 · 1 audit on recordNew Launch · 6h old
SummaryAI Copilot

The DERC20 contract implements a standard ERC-20 token integrated with OpenZeppelin voting, permit, and vesting extensions on Base.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Owner can pause all transfers
  • A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
  • LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
  • Top-10 concentration > 30%
Exact factors
  • Owner can pause all transfers
  • A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
  • LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
  • Top-10 concentration > 30% (100.0% total → 48.2% effective; 16.2% in EOAs, 80.0% in contracts; 3.8% burned, locked or in pools excluded)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (6h old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Oct 254 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipRetained
MintMintable
Liquidity lockUnknown
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Oct 25, 202610,005 holders
80.0%Contracts16.2%Wallets3.8%
80.0%Contracts16.2%Wallets3.8%
ContractsWalletsBurnedBubble area = share of supply
100.0%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking80.0%
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell16.2%
  • Burnedout of circulation3.8%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads48.2%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 25, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Oct 25$173.1K

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensUnknown

Whether the LP tokens are locked could not be determined.

Analysed pool$173.1KShare of depth100.0%

Security Findings

2 Medium5 Info
Medium

Privileged Token Minting Dilutes Existing Holders

The contract owner possesses administrative authority to increase the circulating token supply through the updateMintRate(uint256) and release() functions. When updateMintRate is called, it triggers mintInflation() if an active yearly period has elapsed, diluting the relative balance and voting weight of existing token holders.CP-01

Issue

The contract owner possesses administrative authority to increase the circulating token supply through the updateMintRate(uint256) and release() functions. When updateMintRate is called, it triggers mintInflation() if an active yearly period has elapsed, diluting the relative balance and voting weight of existing token holders.

Fix

Enforce transparent minting schedules governed by a timelock or decentralized governance vote rather than direct owner invocation, and consider lowering or permanently capping maximum emission bounds.

Status

Unresolved

Medium

Owner Controlled Switch Can Restrict Pool Transfers

The contract owner controls liquidity access via lockPool(address) and unlockPool(), which alter the isPoolUnlocked flag and modify the registered pool address. This switch can be utilized to block or restrict transfers involving designated decentralized exchange liquidity pools at the owner's discretion.CP-05

Issue

The contract owner controls liquidity access via lockPool(address) and unlockPool(), which alter the isPoolUnlocked flag and modify the registered pool address. This switch can be utilized to block or restrict transfers involving designated decentralized exchange liquidity pools at the owner's discretion.

Fix

Remove the arbitrary pool locking switch after initial launch or enforce an irreversible one-way unlock to ensure permanent and unhampered trading access for token holders.

Status

Unresolved

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 10,005 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 10,005 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Not listed by any independent source

10,005 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

10,005 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $173K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $364K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $173K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $364K (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $173K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $173K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.

Fix

Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Recently launched — less than a day of market history

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT

Issue

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.

Fix

Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 25
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The DERC20 contract implements a standard ERC-20 token integrated with OpenZeppelin voting, permit, and vesting extensions on Base. The implementation follows modern Solidity patterns with strict bounds on inflation minting, but retains centralized privileged controls over liquidity pool interactions and token supply expansion.

Technical8/10Low risk

Regarding 7.1 Architecture and 7.2 Code Security, the contract demonstrates robust structure by inheriting established OpenZeppelin contracts such as ERC20Votes, ERC20Permit, and Ownable using Solidity 0.8.26 with built-in arithmetic protection. In terms of 7.6 External integrations, external interfaces adhere strictly to ERC-20 standards with nonces and EIP-712 support. However, regarding 7.3 Access Control, critical functionality remains strictly gated behind the owner address without multi-step transition flows, exemplified by direct single-caller execution in lockPool and updateMintRate.

Governance3/10High risk

Under 7.4 Economic considerations, the contract provides strong economic guardrails by capping the annual inflation rate with MAX_YEARLY_MINT_RATE_WAD in updateMintRate to prevent arbitrary hyperinflation. Under 7.5 Governance and 7.8 Operations, voting modules (IERC5805, IVotes) facilitate token-based governance participation. However, operational discretion permits the owner to unilaterally alter the mint rate and trigger inflation minting or disable pool interactions, creating centralized economic intervention risks for holders.

Upgrades4/10Medium risk

Under 7.7 Upgrades, the contract is deployed as an immutable non-proxy implementation on Base, eliminating common proxy storage collision and implementation hijacking risks. The codebase benefits from immutability as core business logic cannot be arbitrarily substituted underneath token holders. Nonetheless, operational parameters such as pool addresses and tokenURI remain mutable via direct owner invocations.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

The protocol should transition administrative authority from a single owner to a timelocked multi-signature wallet or decentralized governance structure to mitigate single point of failure risks.

Restricting discretionary pool locking and enforcing explicit event emissions on all administrative state changes will significantly enhance transparency. Additionally, consider implementing immutable bounds or programmatic schedules for pool locking mechanisms to guarantee unhindered liquidity and trading freedom for all market participants.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypeToken
NetworkBase
Token age6h
Contract0xe2cc…541d
Deployer0x3d02…e2c1
Badge for your website
NOTF security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Oct 25, 202657Medium

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the NOTF contract address?

The NOTF contract on Base is 0xe2cc332525834e89649278e55c3e5ad63b14541d. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.

Is NOTF a scam?

Quantum Audit's risk score for NOTF is 57/100 (Medium risk) as of Oct 25, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Ownership: Retained; Mint: Mintable; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.

Who holds NOTF?

As of Oct 25, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 100.0% of the supply across 10,005 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of NOTF?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page