The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 token with additional governance and vesting capabilities. The protocol relies on a centralized owner to manage minting rates and pool transfer restrictions. While the code follows standard OpenZeppelin patterns, the high degree of administrative control presents a significant centralization risk to token holders.
Early-stage security check β honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is NODF π₯ a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot β the tokenβs risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 token with additional governance and vesting capabilities.
Read the full analysis- Owner can pause all transfers
- A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
- Mintable supply β no cap found, dilution unbounded
- Liquidity not locked
- Volume/Liquidity > 10Γ
- Top-10 concentration > 30%
Exact factors
- Owner can pause all transfers
- A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
- Mintable supply β no cap found, dilution unbounded
- Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool) β held by independent providers β market-depth risk
- Volume/Liquidity > 10Γ (13.1Γ β possible wash trading)
- Top-10 concentration > 30% (100.0% total β 48.2% effective; 16.2% in EOAs, 80.0% in contracts; 3.8% burned, locked or in pools excluded)
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit Β· Oct 23Holders
as of audit Β· Oct 23, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking80.0%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell16.2%
- Burnedout of circulation3.8%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 23, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit Β· Oct 23The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.
0x5477β¦8414No privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.
Security Findings
MediumCentralized Minting Control
The owner has the authority to call updateMintRate and release, which can increase the total supply of the token. This allows the owner to dilute the holdings of all existing token holders at their discretion.CP-01
Issue
The owner has the authority to call updateMintRate and release, which can increase the total supply of the token. This allows the owner to dilute the holdings of all existing token holders at their discretion.
Fix
Implement a time-lock for minting rate changes or move the ownership to a DAO-controlled contract to ensure community oversight.
Status
Unresolved
MediumCentralized Transfer Restrictions
The owner can use the lockPool and unlockPool functions to enable or disable transfers for specific pools. This gives the owner the power to effectively freeze liquidity or prevent users from trading their tokens.CP-05
Issue
The owner can use the lockPool and unlockPool functions to enable or disable transfers for specific pools. This gives the owner the power to effectively freeze liquidity or prevent users from trading their tokens.
Fix
Restrict the ability to lock/unlock pools to a decentralized governance process or remove the functionality if it is not strictly required for protocol operation.
Status
Unresolved
MediumLiquidity not locked
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them β a wallet, 0x5477β¦8414 β holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY
Issue
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them β a wallet, 0x5477β¦8414 β holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.
Fix
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned β not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 6,053 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned β not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 6,053 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks β those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
6,053 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
6,053 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $205K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $2.7M (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $205K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $2.7M (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown β they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics β Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $205K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics β Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $205K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched β less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score β a new token is not a risky one by default β but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score β a new token is not a risky one by default β but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit Β· Oct 23The contract utilizes standard, battle-tested OpenZeppelin libraries for ERC-20 and governance functionality. 7.1 Architecture is modular, and 7.2 Code Security is high due to the use of established patterns. 7.3 Access Control is strictly enforced via Ownable, though it grants broad powers. 7.6 External dependencies are minimal and well-vetted.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance aspects are heavily centralized under the owner. The owner can unilaterally adjust minting rates and lock pool transfers, which directly impacts token liquidity and supply. While these features allow for controlled growth, they lack decentralized oversight or time-locks.
7.7 Upgrades are not supported as this is a non-proxy contract. 7.8 Operations are straightforward, relying on the owner to trigger vesting releases and rate updates. The lack of upgradeability ensures immutability of the core logic.
To improve security, consider transitioning the ownership to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract to mitigate the risk of a single point of failure.
Implementing a time-lock on privileged functions like updateMintRate and lockPool would provide transparency and allow the community to react to administrative changes.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Oct 23, 202660Medium
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots β history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the NODF contract address?
The NODF π₯ (NODF) contract on Base is 0xcbd6e87ba88cb039009b3da97839dc96de3e955d. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.
Is NODF π₯ a scam?
Quantum Audit's risk score for NODF π₯ is 60/100 (Medium risk) as of Oct 23, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts β Contract verified: Verified; Ownership: Retained; Mint: Mintable; Liquidity lock: Not locked; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.
Is NODF liquidity locked?
Liquidity lock: Not locked (as of Oct 23, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $204.9K.
Who holds NODF?
As of Oct 23, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 100.0% of the supply across 6,053 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of NODF π₯?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code β free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page