The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 token with additional governance and vesting capabilities. The protocol relies on a centralized owner to manage token inflation and pool access. While the code follows standard OpenZeppelin patterns, the high level of administrative control over supply and transferability introduces significant trust requirements for token holders.
Early-stage security check β honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is NODF π₯ a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot β the tokenβs risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 token with additional governance and vesting capabilities.
Read the full analysis- Owner can pause all transfers
- A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
- Mintable supply β no cap found, dilution unbounded
- LP lock status UNKNOWN β the pool's LP could not be read
- Top-10 concentration > 30%
Exact factors
- Owner can pause all transfers
- A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
- Mintable supply β no cap found, dilution unbounded
- LP lock status UNKNOWN β the pool's LP could not be read
- Top-10 concentration > 30% (100.0% total β 48.2% effective; 16.2% in EOAs, 80.0% in contracts; 3.8% burned, locked or in pools excluded)
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit Β· Oct 24Holders
as of audit Β· Oct 24, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking80.0%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell16.2%
- Burnedout of circulation3.8%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 24, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit Β· Oct 24The risk score reads depth across every pair.
Whether the LP tokens are locked could not be determined.
Security Findings
MediumCentralized Minting Control
The owner has the authority to increase the total supply of tokens via the updateMintRate and release functions. This allows the owner to dilute the holdings of all existing token holders at their discretion, provided they stay within the 2% annual cap.CP-01
Issue
The owner has the authority to increase the total supply of tokens via the updateMintRate and release functions. This allows the owner to dilute the holdings of all existing token holders at their discretion, provided they stay within the 2% annual cap.
Fix
Implement a timelock for minting operations or move the minting authority to a decentralized governance contract to prevent unilateral supply changes.
Status
Unresolved
MediumCentralized Transfer Restrictions
The owner can toggle the isPoolUnlocked switch using the lockPool and unlockPool functions. This allows the owner to arbitrarily halt or enable token transfers, effectively freezing user assets or liquidity at will.CP-05
Issue
The owner can toggle the isPoolUnlocked switch using the lockPool and unlockPool functions. This allows the owner to arbitrarily halt or enable token transfers, effectively freezing user assets or liquidity at will.
Fix
Remove the ability for the owner to pause transfers or implement a community-driven emergency pause mechanism that requires a consensus threshold.
Status
Unresolved
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned β not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 10,013 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned β not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 10,013 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks β those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
10,013 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
10,013 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $188K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $1.6M (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $188K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $1.6M (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown β they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics β Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $188K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics β Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $188K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched β less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score β a new token is not a risky one by default β but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score β a new token is not a risky one by default β but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit Β· Oct 24The contract utilizes well-audited OpenZeppelin libraries for ERC-20 and governance features. 7.1 Architecture is modular, and 7.2 Code Security is robust with no obvious reentrancy or overflow vulnerabilities. 7.3 Access Control is strictly enforced via Ownable, though the centralization of power remains a structural concern.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance aspects are heavily centralized under the owner. The owner can unilaterally mint tokens and toggle transfer restrictions, which directly impacts 7.8 Operations. While inflation is capped at 2%, the ability to modify supply and liquidity access creates a single point of failure.
The contract is not upgradeable (7.7 Upgrades), which provides immutability for the logic layer. This eliminates risks associated with proxy storage collisions or malicious implementation swaps. Future changes to the protocol would require a new contract deployment and migration.
To improve security, consider transitioning the ownership to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized DAO structure to mitigate the risks associated with a single privileged account.
Additionally, implement a timelock on all sensitive administrative functions to provide transparency and a window for users to react to significant changes in tokenomics or transfer rules.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Oct 24, 202656Medium
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots β history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the NODF contract address?
The NODF π₯ (NODF) contract on Base is 0x744f2017c13b190432f1537a7c5d9acd7d203fa9. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.
Is NODF π₯ a scam?
Quantum Audit's risk score for NODF π₯ is 56/100 (Medium risk) as of Oct 24, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts β Contract verified: Verified; Ownership: Retained; Mint: Mintable; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.
Who holds NODF?
As of Oct 24, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 100.0% of the supply across 10,013 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of NODF π₯?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code β free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page