Is mogging a Scam? Security Analysis

mogging MOGGING

5oq4zK…pump

Solana Not verifiedLast checked 3d ago 1 audit on record

DexScreener ↗

67 / 100

High Risk

Executive SummaryAI Copilot

This audit of the mogging SPL Token Mint found no critical or high-severity issues based on the provided on-chain facts and external security signals. Both mint and freeze authorities are revoked, and no Token-2022 extensions posing significant risks are active. Holder distribution data was unavailable, preventing an assessment of supply concentration.

1 Informational

i Our automated scanner reviewed mogging (MOGGING) on Solana. 1 of 4 security checks passed — see the full breakdown below.

Volume 24h

$273.1500

Liquidity

$31.7K

Price

$0.00006005

Age

2mo

Top 10 Holders

51.2%

Security Findings

1 Info

Info

No code-level findings — an SPL mint exposes no auditable program source

I-01This token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.

IssueThis token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.

FixRead the risk score breakdown below as the substance of this audit. For a code-level review, the token would need an accompanying verified program.

StatusAcknowledged

Category Ratings

TechnicalMedium6/10

The mogging token is implemented using the spl-token-2022 program. Crucially, both the mint authority and freeze authority have been revoked, preventing further token issuance or freezing of holder accounts. No Transfer Hook is active, and the Default Account State is not frozen, ensuring standard transfer behavior and immediate usability of new accounts. The token also lacks balance mutability, enhancing security.

GovernanceHigh1/10

The token exhibits moderate liquidity at $41,670, with a healthy 24-hour volume of $6,238, resulting in a normal Volume/Liquidity Ratio of 0.15. The DEX pair has been active for 121 days, providing a reasonable track record. However, holder concentration data was unavailable, precluding an assessment of potential whale-induced price volatility.

UpgradesMedium5/10

The token's mint and freeze authorities are permanently revoked, meaning no further tokens can be minted and no accounts can be frozen. Metadata is immutable, preventing changes to the token's name, symbol, or image post-launch. There are no active Token-2022 extensions that would allow for future upgradability or modification of core token behavior.

Security Checklist

1/4 checks passed

Contract VerifiedFail

No Mint Function?

Liquidity LockedFail

Not a ProxyPass

Liquidity Depth

$31.7K

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

What Raised This Score

6 factors

Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
Contract source NOT verified
Top-10 concentration > 50% (51.2% total → 51.2% effective; 51.2% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts — heavy)
Liquidity NOT locked (owner can withdraw — rug-pull risk)
Liquidity < $50k ($31,657 across 1 pairs — thin market)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Frequently Asked Questions

Is mogging a scam?

Based on the available data, mogging exhibits several high-risk characteristics. The unverified contract, unrenounced ownership, and unlocked liquidity are significant red flags. While the data doesn't definitively label it a scam, these elements create a high potential for developer-induced issues or asset withdrawal, warranting extreme caution. Investors should be aware of these fundamental security gaps.

Is mogging safe to buy?

Mogging is currently classified as 'High Risk' with a score of 61/100, indicating it is not safe for most investors. Key risks include the contract not being verified, unrenounced ownership allowing potential developer manipulation, and unlocked liquidity exposing funds to potential rug pulls. These factors collectively highlight significant vulnerabilities, suggesting investors face substantial security risks when considering this token.

Has mogging been audited?

The mogging contract is reported as 'not verified.' This means its code has not been published and confirmed on the blockchain. Without verification, assessing its functionality or security through an audit is severely hampered. Investors cannot independently inspect the contract, posing a significant transparency and trust risk.

Is mogging a Scam?

Security Findings

No code-level findings — an SPL mint exposes no auditable program source

Category Ratings

Security Checklist

Liquidity Depth

What Raised This Score

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Audits

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of mogging?