Honeypot, rug-pull and ownership checks
Every audit run adds a dated snapshot — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
This audit of the mogging SPL Token Mint found no critical or high-severity issues based on the provided on-chain facts and external security signals. Both mint and freeze authorities are revoked, and no Token-2022 extensions posing significant risks are active. Holder distribution data was unavailable, preventing an assessment of supply concentration.
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Based on the available data, mogging exhibits several high-risk characteristics. The unverified contract, unrenounced ownership, and unlocked liquidity are significant red flags. While the data doesn't definitively label it a scam, these elements create a high potential for developer-induced issues or asset withdrawal, warranting extreme caution. Investors should be aware of these fundamental security gaps.
Mogging is currently classified as 'High Risk' with a score of 61/100, indicating it is not safe for most investors. Key risks include the contract not being verified, unrenounced ownership allowing potential developer manipulation, and unlocked liquidity exposing funds to potential rug pulls. These factors collectively highlight significant vulnerabilities, suggesting investors face substantial security risks when considering this token.
The mogging contract is reported as 'not verified.' This means its code has not been published and confirmed on the blockchain. Without verification, assessing its functionality or security through an audit is severely hampered. Investors cannot independently inspect the contract, posing a significant transparency and trust risk.
Paste the contract address into our AI-powered scanner for a deeper real-time report — free, no signup required.
Get Detailed Audit