Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Honeypot, rug-pull and ownership checks

Is mogging a Scam?

MOGGINGSolana
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Sep 22, 2026 · 2 audits on record
SummaryAI Copilot

This audit of the mogging SPL Token Mint found no critical or high-severity issues based on the provided on-chain facts and external security signals.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Top-10 concentration > 50%
  • Liquidity < $50k
Exact factors
  • Top-10 concentration > 50% (58.8% total → 58.8% effective; 58.8% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts — heavy)
  • Liquidity < $50k ($27,056 across 1 pairs — thin market)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Our automated scanner reviewed mogging (MOGGING) on Solana. 4 of 4 security checks passed — see the full breakdown below.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Sep 224 of 4 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
MintNo mint
Liquidity lockLocked
UpgradeabilityFixed code

Holders

as of audit · Sep 22, 2026
58.8%Top 10 holders41.2%Everyone else
58.8%Top 10 holders41.2%Everyone else
Top 10 holdersEveryone elseBubble area = share of supply
58.8%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Top 10 holdersthe ten largest balances58.8%
  • Everyone elsethe rest of the supply41.2%

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Sep 22, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Sep 22$27.1K

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensLocked

The LP tokens of the analysed pool are locked or burned.

Analysed pool$27.1KShare of depth100.0%

Security Findings

1 Info
Info

No code-level findings — an SPL mint exposes no auditable program source

This token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on mint/owner authority, mint capability, LP lock/burn state, holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.I-01

Issue

This token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on mint/owner authority, mint capability, LP lock/burn state, holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.

Fix

Read the risk score breakdown below as the substance of this audit. For a code-level review, the token would need an accompanying verified program.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Sep 22
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

This audit of the mogging SPL Token Mint found no critical or high-severity issues based on the provided on-chain facts and external security signals. Both mint and freeze authorities are revoked, and no Token-2022 extensions posing significant risks are active. Holder distribution data was unavailable, preventing an assessment of supply concentration.

Technical10/10Low risk

The mogging token is implemented using the spl-token-2022 program. Crucially, both the mint authority and freeze authority have been revoked, preventing further token issuance or freezing of holder accounts. No Transfer Hook is active, and the Default Account State is not frozen, ensuring standard transfer behavior and immediate usability of new accounts. The token also lacks balance mutability, enhancing security.

Governance7/10Low risk

The token exhibits moderate liquidity at $41,670, with a healthy 24-hour volume of $6,238, resulting in a normal Volume/Liquidity Ratio of 0.15. The DEX pair has been active for 121 days, providing a reasonable track record. However, holder concentration data was unavailable, precluding an assessment of potential whale-induced price volatility.

Upgrades10/10Low risk

The token's mint and freeze authorities are permanently revoked, meaning no further tokens can be minted and no accounts can be frozen. Metadata is immutable, preventing changes to the token's name, symbol, or image post-launch. There are no active Token-2022 extensions that would allow for future upgradability or modification of core token behavior.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

Prospective holders should monitor the token's liquidity and trading volume for any significant changes.

It is also recommended to regularly check for the availability of holder distribution data to assess potential concentration risks. Verify on-chain that the mint and freeze authorities remain revoked before making any investment decisions.

Contract & Record

2 audits on record
TypeSPL Token-2022
NetworkSolana
Token age2mo
Contract5oq4zK…pump
Badge for your website
mogging security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Sep 22, 202617Low
  2. Sep 4, 202667High
  3. Jul 23, 202659Medium

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is mogging a scam?

Based on the available data, mogging exhibits several high-risk characteristics. The unverified contract, unrenounced ownership, and unlocked liquidity are significant red flags. While the data doesn't definitively label it a scam, these elements create a high potential for developer-induced issues or asset withdrawal, warranting extreme caution. Investors should be aware of these fundamental security gaps.

Is mogging safe to buy?

Mogging is currently classified as 'High Risk' with a score of 61/100, indicating it is not safe for most investors. Key risks include the contract not being verified, unrenounced ownership allowing potential developer manipulation, and unlocked liquidity exposing funds to potential rug pulls. These factors collectively highlight significant vulnerabilities, suggesting investors face substantial security risks when considering this token.

Has mogging been audited?

The mogging contract is reported as 'not verified.' This means its code has not been published and confirmed on the blockchain. Without verification, assessing its functionality or security through an audit is severely hampered. Investors cannot independently inspect the contract, posing a significant transparency and trust risk.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of mogging?

Paste the contract address into our AI-powered scanner for a deeper real-time report — free, with every scoring factor shown.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page