On-chain security analysis — is it a scam or legit?
SolanaThe Bitcoin Bank (BTCBANK) SPL Token Mint exhibits a robust configuration with both mint and freeze authorities revoked, preventing further supply dilution or account freezing.
Read the full analysisEach factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Sep 22, 2026
The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are locked or burned.
This token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on mint/owner authority, mint capability, LP lock/burn state, holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.
Read the risk score breakdown below as the substance of this audit. For a code-level review, the token would need an accompanying verified program.
Acknowledged
The Bitcoin Bank (BTCBANK) SPL Token Mint exhibits a robust configuration with both mint and freeze authorities revoked, preventing further supply dilution or account freezing. No critical or high-risk vulnerabilities were identified based on the available on-chain facts and third-party registry data. Holder distribution data was unavailable, precluding an assessment of supply concentration risk.
The Bitcoin Bank (BTCBANK) token is implemented using the spl-token-2022 program, indicating modern SPL token standards. Both the mint authority and freeze authority have been revoked, preventing further token issuance or freezing of holder accounts. Key extensions like Transfer Hook and Default Account State Frozen are not active, and the token is configured with immutable balance, closable, freezable, non-transferable, transfer fee upgradable, and transfer hook upgradable states, enhancing its fixed properties.
DEX liquidity for BTCBANK is $16,198, which is above the very low liquidity threshold. The 24-hour volume of $12,983 results in a normal Volume/Liquidity Ratio of 0.80, not indicating wash trading. The DEX pair has been active for 49 days, providing a reasonable track record. Holder concentration data was unavailable, preventing an assessment of supply distribution risk.
The token's mint and freeze authorities are permanently revoked, ensuring no future changes to supply or account freeze status. The token utilizes the spl-token-2022 program but does not have a Transfer Hook or Default Account State Frozen enabled. Furthermore, the metadata is immutable, meaning the token's name, symbol, or image cannot be altered post-launch. All upgradability flags for transfer fees and transfer hooks are set to false, indicating a fixed configuration.
Holders should continue to monitor the token's market dynamics, particularly liquidity and trading volume, for any significant changes.
While no immediate risks were identified, it is prudent to verify the token's status on-chain periodically to confirm that authorities remain revoked. Any future changes in the token's market behavior or external security signals should be re-evaluated.
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Based on the available data, Bitcoin Bank (BTCBANK) exhibits several high-risk characteristics commonly associated with potential scams. The contract is unverified, ownership is not renounced, and liquidity is unlocked. These elements allow developers complete control over the token's future, including the ability to remove liquidity and potentially render tokens worthless, making it highly susceptible to a "rug pull."
Given its high-risk score of 70/100, Bitcoin Bank (BTCBANK) is not considered safe for investment. Key risk factors include an unverified contract, unrenounced ownership, and unlocked liquidity. These conditions expose investors to significant vulnerabilities such as potential contract manipulation, token supply inflation, and the complete withdrawal of liquidity, leading to substantial financial loss.
There is no indication that Bitcoin Bank (BTCBANK) has undergone a formal security audit. Crucially, its contract remains unverified, meaning the underlying code is not publicly available for review by auditors or the community. Without contract verification, a comprehensive security audit is impossible, leaving potential vulnerabilities undetected and unaddressed.
Our AI-powered scanner gives you a deeper, real-time smart contract analysis — free, with every scoring factor shown.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page
