Solana · Smart Contract Security · Updated Jul 24, 2026

Is Bitcoin Bank Safe? BTCBANK

On-chain security analysis — is it a scam or legit?

Contract 9s96G1…pump DexScreener ↗

67 / 100

High Risk How is this score calculated? →

Volume 24h

$310.1800

Liquidity

$12.7K

Price

$0.00001605

Token Age

15d

Top 10 Holders

67.4%

Security Checklist

1/5 checks passed

Contract VerifiedFail

Ownership RenouncedUnknown

No Mint FunctionUnknown

Liquidity LockedFail

Not a ProxyPass

Audit History

2 audits on record

Jul 2367

Every audit run adds a dated snapshot — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Audit Summary

The Bitcoin Bank (BTCBANK) SPL Token Mint exhibits a robust configuration with both mint and freeze authorities revoked, preventing further supply dilution or account freezing. No critical or high-risk vulnerabilities were identified based on the available on-chain facts and third-party registry data. Holder distribution data was unavailable, precluding an assessment of supply concentration risk.

Final Recommendation: Holders should continue to monitor the token's market dynamics, particularly liquidity and trading volume, for any significant changes. While no immediate risks were identified, it is prudent to verify the token's status on-chain periodically to confirm that authorities remain revoked. Any future changes in the token's market behavior or external security signals should be re-evaluated.

Category Ratings

TechnicalMedium

6/10

The Bitcoin Bank (BTCBANK) token is implemented using the spl-token-2022 program, indicating modern SPL token standards. Both the mint authority and freeze authority have been revoked, preventing further token issuance or freezing of holder accounts. Key extensions like Transfer Hook and Default Acc

GovernanceHigh

1/10

DEX liquidity for BTCBANK is $16,198, which is above the very low liquidity threshold. The 24-hour volume of $12,983 results in a normal Volume/Liquidity Ratio of 0.80, not indicating wash trading. The DEX pair has been active for 49 days, providing a reasonable track record. Holder concentration da

UpgradesMedium

5/10

The token's mint and freeze authorities are permanently revoked, ensuring no future changes to supply or account freeze status. The token utilizes the spl-token-2022 program but does not have a Transfer Hook or Default Account State Frozen enabled. Furthermore, the metadata is immutable, meanin

What Raised This Score

7 factors

Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
Contract source NOT verified
Top-10 concentration > 50% (67.4% total → 67.4% effective; 67.4% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts — heavy)
Liquidity NOT locked (owner can withdraw — rug-pull risk)
Liquidity < $50k ($12,673 across 2 pairs — thin market)
Token age < 30 days (still settling)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Bitcoin Bank a scam?

Based on the available data, Bitcoin Bank (BTCBANK) exhibits several high-risk characteristics commonly associated with potential scams. The contract is unverified, ownership is not renounced, and liquidity is unlocked. These elements allow developers complete control over the token's future, including the ability to remove liquidity and potentially render tokens worthless, making it highly susceptible to a "rug pull."

Is Bitcoin Bank safe to buy?

Given its high-risk score of 70/100, Bitcoin Bank (BTCBANK) is not considered safe for investment. Key risk factors include an unverified contract, unrenounced ownership, and unlocked liquidity. These conditions expose investors to significant vulnerabilities such as potential contract manipulation, token supply inflation, and the complete withdrawal of liquidity, leading to substantial financial loss.

Has Bitcoin Bank been audited?

There is no indication that Bitcoin Bank (BTCBANK) has undergone a formal security audit. Crucially, its contract remains unverified, meaning the underlying code is not publicly available for review by auditors or the community. Without contract verification, a comprehensive security audit is impossible, leaving potential vulnerabilities undetected and unaddressed.