Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is MAMESUKE a Scam?

Ethereum
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Nov 4, 2026 · 1 audit on recordNew Launch · 1d old
SummaryAI Copilot

The protocol implements a standard ERC-20 token contract. The architecture follows OpenZeppelin standards, ensuring basic compatibility with DeFi ecosystems.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Code: Non-Compliant ERC-20 Return Values
Exact factors
  • Code: Non-Compliant ERC-20 Return Values (High, static analysis)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (1d old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Nov 46 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipUnknown
MintNo mint
Liquidity lockLocked
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Nov 4, 2026399 holders
8.4%Contracts10.1%Wallets5.5%76.0%Everyone else
8.4%10.1%5.5%76.0%Everyone else
ContractsWalletsBurnedEveryone elseBubble area = share of supply
24.0%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking8.4%
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell10.1%
  • Burnedout of circulation5.5%
  • Everyone else389 holders76.0%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads13.4%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Nov 4, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Nov 4$57.1K

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensLocked

The LP tokens of the analysed pool are locked or burned.

Analysed pool$57.1KShare of depth100.0%
LP Burned100.0% · ≈ permanent lock
LP Locked100.0% · Dead Address

Security Findings

1 High6 Info
High

Non-Compliant ERC-20 Return Values

The transfer and transferFrom functions do not correctly handle return values in accordance with the ERC-20 standard. This can cause external contracts that rely on the boolean return value to fail or revert when interacting with this token.CD-01

Issue

The transfer and transferFrom functions do not correctly handle return values in accordance with the ERC-20 standard. This can cause external contracts that rely on the boolean return value to fail or revert when interacting with this token.

Fix

Modify the _transfer logic and ensure that the transfer and transferFrom functions explicitly return the boolean success status as required by the ERC-20 specification.

Status

Unresolved

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 24.0% of supply. Of that, 5.5% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 10.1% in wallets, 8.4% in other contracts. 399 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 24.0% of supply. Of that, 5.5% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 10.1% in wallets, 8.4% in other contracts. 399 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Not listed by any independent source

399 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

399 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Liquidity burned — cannot be withdrawn

100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY

Issue

100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.

Fix

Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $57K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $138K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $57K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $138K (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $57K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: 1 days of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $57K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: 1 days of market history.

Fix

Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Recently launched — 1 day of market history

The token's oldest DEX pool is 1 day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT

Issue

The token's oldest DEX pool is 1 day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.

Fix

Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Nov 4
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The protocol implements a standard ERC-20 token contract. The architecture follows OpenZeppelin standards, ensuring basic compatibility with DeFi ecosystems. However, a critical logic flaw exists in the transfer mechanism that violates the ERC-20 specification regarding return values, which may cause integration failures with automated systems.

Technical9/10Low risk

The contract utilizes standard OpenZeppelin libraries for core ERC-20 functionality. 7.1 Architecture is modular and follows established patterns. 7.2 Code Security is hampered by a non-compliant return value implementation. 7.3 Access Control is absent, as the contract is immutable and lacks administrative privileges.

Governance9/10Low risk

7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance aspects are not applicable as the contract is a simple, non-upgradable token without minting or burning capabilities. The supply is fixed at deployment. There are no governance mechanisms or external economic dependencies.

Upgrades10/10Low risk

7.7 Upgrades are not supported as the contract is not a proxy. 7.8 Operations are straightforward with no administrative overhead. The contract is immutable by design.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

The primary recommendation is to update the transfer logic to ensure full compliance with the ERC-20 standard.

Specifically, ensure that all transfer functions correctly handle and return boolean values as expected by external smart contracts and decentralized exchanges. Additionally, perform thorough integration testing with common DeFi routers to ensure that the current implementation does not cause transaction reverts in automated liquidity pools.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypeToken
NetworkEthereum
Token age1d
Contract0xa6b6…05d2
Deployer0xfa36…38e2
Badge for your website
MAMESUKE security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Nov 4, 202629Low

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of MAMESUKE?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified