Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
EthereumThe Macca contract is a standard ERC-20 token implementation with additional custom logic for wallet limits and transaction handling.
Read the full analysisEach factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Nov 2, 2026
The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are locked or burned.
The _transfer, transfer, and transferFrom functions do not correctly return the expected boolean values required by the ERC-20 standard. This can cause external protocols or automated systems interacting with the token to fail or incorrectly interpret transaction success.
Ensure that all transfer functions explicitly return a boolean 'true' upon successful execution, consistent with the ERC-20 specification.
Unresolved
The returnTx function uses tx.origin to determine authorization or rules. This is a security vulnerability because an attacker can use a malicious contract to trigger a transaction, causing tx.origin to point to the user while msg.sender points to the malicious contract, potentially bypassing intended security checks.
Replace all instances of tx.origin with msg.sender to ensure that authorization is checked against the immediate caller of the function.
Unresolved
The ten largest holders own 30.0% of supply. What remains: 11.4% in wallets, 18.6% in other contracts. 202 holders in total.
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Acknowledged
202 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Acknowledged
100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Acknowledged
Liquidity $17K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $93K (DexScreener, all pools).
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Acknowledged
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $17K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Acknowledged
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Acknowledged
The Macca contract is a standard ERC-20 token implementation with additional custom logic for wallet limits and transaction handling. The architecture follows standard OpenZeppelin patterns, but the implementation contains critical flaws in return value handling and insecure authorization patterns that could lead to integration failures or unauthorized state manipulation.
The contract utilizes standard ERC-20 structures for core functionality. 7.1 Architecture is straightforward, though 7.2 Code Security is compromised by incorrect return value handling in transfer functions. 7.3 Access Control is minimal as there are no administrative roles, but 7.6 External interactions are risky due to the use of tx.origin.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance controls are absent, as the contract lacks administrative functions or minting capabilities. The token relies on static supply, which limits economic risk. 7.8 Operations are simplified due to the lack of complex state-changing privileged functions.
The contract is not upgradeable (7.7 Upgrades), which eliminates risks associated with proxy patterns or logic changes. The code is fixed upon deployment, ensuring that the current logic remains constant.
The project should immediately rectify the return value logic in the transfer functions to ensure compatibility with standard DeFi protocols.
Additionally, the use of tx.origin must be replaced with msg.sender to prevent potential cross-contract authorization attacks.
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified
