Quantum Audit Logo

Is Lil Finder Guy a Scam?

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Lil Finder Guy LFG
0xb200…bd01
Base Not verifiedLast checked 3d ago 1 audit on record New Launch · 12h old
How is this score calculated? → Medium Risk
Executive SummaryAI Copilot

This audit report is based on the analysis of a contract address on the Base network. Crucially, no source code was provided for review, which severely limits the scope and depth of the security assessment. The findings primarily highlight the risks associated with interacting with unverified contracts. A comprehensive security analysis, including identification of common vulnerabilities, is not possible without the contract's source code.

1 Informational
! Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (12h old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.
Volume 24h
$52.9K
Liquidity
$32.3K
Price
$0.00008329
Token Age
12h
Top 10 Holders
36.8%

Security Findings

Info

Lack of Verified Source Code

I-01The source code for the contract at address 0xb200…bd01 on the Base network is not publicly verified. This prevents a thorough security audit and makes it impossible to ascertain the contract's intended functionality, security mechanisms, or potential vulnerabilities (7.1 Architecture, 7.2 Code Security, 7.3 Access Control, 7.4 Economic, 7.5 Governance, 7.7 Upgrades, 7.8 Operations). Users interacting with unverified contracts face significant risks due to the unknown nature of the code.
IssueThe source code for the contract at address on the Base network is not publicly verified. This prevents a thorough security audit and makes it impossible to ascertain the contract's intended functionality, security mechanisms, or potential vulnerabilities (7.1 Architecture, 7.2 Code Security, 7.3 Access Control, 7.4 Economic, 7.5 Governance, 7.7 Upgrades, 7.8 Operations). Users interacting with unverified contracts face significant risks due to the unknown nature of the code.
FixThe project team should verify the contract's source code on the Base network's block explorer (e.g., Basescan). This will enable transparency, allow for community review, and facilitate independent security audits. Providing the exact Solidity compiler version and optimization settings used during deployment is also crucial for accurate verification.
StatusUnresolved

Category Ratings

TechnicalLow8/10

Without access to the contract's source code, a comprehensive technical security analysis (7.1 Architecture, 7.2 Code Security, 7.3 Access Control) cannot be performed. This significantly hinders the ability to identify common vulnerabilities like reentrancy, integer overflows, or logic errors. The lack of verified source code on-chain prevents independent security review and increases operational risk, as the exact functionality and security properties remain unknown.

GovernanceHigh1/10

The economic and governance aspects (7.4 Economic, 7.5 Governance) of the contract cannot be assessed without source code. It is impossible to determine if the contract implements any governance mechanisms, tokenomics, or economic incentives, or if it is susceptible to oracle manipulation or flash loan attacks. This introduces an unknown level of economic risk for users interacting with the contract, as potential attack vectors or centralized control points cannot be identified.

UpgradesMedium6/10

The upgradeability status (7.7 Upgrades) of the contract cannot be determined without its source code. It is unknown whether the contract is part of a proxy pattern (e.g., UUPS, Transparent) or if it has any self-upgrade capabilities. This lack of transparency means users cannot ascertain the immutability or potential for future changes to the contract's logic, posing an operational risk where contract behavior could change unexpectedly.

Security Checklist

Contract VerifiedPass
Ownership Renounced?
No Mint Function?
Liquidity LockedFail
Not a ProxyPass
HoneypotNoneBuy Tax0.0%Sell Tax0.0%

Holder Composition

1.2% in wallets35.6% in contracts
Effective Concentration15.5%

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Liquidity Depth

Show 1 more pairShow less

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

LP Distribution

Top-1 Unlocked Holder100.0%
Top-3 Unlocked100.0%

Key Addresses

Unlocked LP Held By
0x0683…658c

No privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.

What Raised This Score

  • Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
  • Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
  • Liquidity not locked, but no owner/deployer address holds LP — market-depth risk, not rug risk
  • Liquidity < $50k ($33,384 across 7 pairs — thin market)
  • LP top1 unlocked holder = 100.0% (independent LP — depth risk, pool = 97% of DEX liquidity)
  • LP top3 unlocked holders = 100.0% (independent LP — depth risk, pool = 97% of DEX liquidity)
  • Token age < 24h (brand new — bot activity, unproven)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Related Audits

Nockchain (NOCK)Medium RiskSolana (Universal) (USOL)Medium RiskElsaMedium RiskAerodrome Finance (AERO)Medium RiskaeonHigh RiskSapienMedium Risk

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Lil Finder Guy?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit