Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

On-chain security analysis — is it a scam or legit?

Is KAITO Safe?

Base
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Sep 4, 2026 · 1 audit on record
SummaryAI Copilot

The Kaito token contract is a standard ERC20 implementation leveraging OpenZeppelin's battle-tested libraries, including ERC20Permit for gas-less approvals.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Ownership status UNKNOWN
  • Top-10 concentration > 70%
  • Liquidity not locked, but no owner/deployer address holds LP — market-depth risk, not rug risk
  • Liquidity < $50k
  • LP top1 unlocked holder = 66.8%
  • LP top3 unlocked holders = 100.0%
  • 1 Medium finding(s) from audit
  • 1 Low finding(s) from audit
Exact factors
  • Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
  • Top-10 concentration > 70% (86.7% total → 81.6% effective; 78.1% in EOAs, 8.6% in contracts — extreme)
  • Liquidity not locked, but no owner/deployer address holds LP — market-depth risk, not rug risk
  • Liquidity < $50k ($46,350 across 13 pairs — thin market)
  • LP top1 unlocked holder = 66.8% (independent LP — depth risk, pool = 26% of DEX liquidity)
  • LP top3 unlocked holders = 100.0% (independent LP — depth risk, pool = 26% of DEX liquidity)
  • 1 Medium finding(s) from audit
  • 1 Low finding(s) from audit

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Security Checklist

as of audit · Sep 45 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipUnknown
MintNo mint
Liquidity lockNot locked
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Sep 4, 2026
8.6%78.1%Wallets13.3%Everyone else
8.6%78.1%Wallets13.3%Everyone else
ContractsWalletsEveryone elseBubble area = share of supply
86.7%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking8.6%
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell78.1%
  • Everyone elsethe rest of the supply13.3%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads81.6%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Sep 4, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Sep 4$46.3K across 13 pairs
LP tokensNot locked

The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.

Analysed pool$11.9KShare of depth25.6%
Top-1 Unlocked Holder66.8%
Top-3 Unlocked100.0%
Unlocked LP held by
0xb333…1bd00xfe72…626b0x4d06…703c

No privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.

Security Findings

1 Medium1 Low1 Info
Medium

Centralized Initial Token Distribution

The contract's constructor mints the entire TOTALSUPPLY (1 billion tokens) to a predefined list of wallets and amounts. This design choice results in a highly centralized initial distribution, concentrating significant control over the token supply in the hands of a few addresses. This could lead to market manipulation or governance issues if the token were to be used in a decentralized governance system (7.4 Economic, 7.5 Governance).M-01

Issue

The contract's constructor mints the entire TOTALSUPPLY (1 billion tokens) to a predefined list of wallets and amounts. This design choice results in a highly centralized initial distribution, concentrating significant control over the token supply in the hands of a few addresses. This could lead to market manipulation or governance issues if the token were to be used in a decentralized governance system (7.4 Economic, 7.5 Governance).

Fix

While this is a design choice, it is crucial to acknowledge and communicate the implications of such a centralized initial distribution. Consider implementing a vesting schedule or a more decentralized distribution mechanism for future token projects to mitigate concentration risk. Ensure transparency regarding the ownership and purpose of the initial recipient wallets.

Status

Unresolved

Low

Absence of Emergency Administrative Controls

The Kaito token contract does not implement any administrative functions such as pause or blacklist (7.3 Access Control). While this design promotes decentralization and immutability, it also means that in the event of a critical vulnerability in an integrated DeFi protocol or a major security incident, there is no mechanism to halt token transfers or freeze malicious accounts. This lack of emergency response capability could exacerbate losses in unforeseen circumstances (7.8 Operations).L-01

Issue

The Kaito token contract does not implement any administrative functions such as pause or blacklist (7.3 Access Control). While this design promotes decentralization and immutability, it also means that in the event of a critical vulnerability in an integrated DeFi protocol or a major security incident, there is no mechanism to halt token transfers or freeze malicious accounts. This lack of emergency response capability could exacerbate losses in unforeseen circumstances (7.8 Operations).

Fix

Assess the project's risk tolerance and operational needs. If the ability to react to emergencies is deemed critical, consider adding a Pausable mechanism (e.g., from OpenZeppelin) controlled by a multi-signature wallet. If decentralization is paramount, ensure all users are aware of the immutable nature and lack of intervention capabilities.

Status

Unresolved

Info

Fixed Total Supply

The TOTALSUPPLY is defined as a constant and all tokens are minted exclusively during the contract's deployment. There is no function to mint additional tokens after the initial distribution. This design ensures a fixed and immutable total supply of 1 billion tokens (1e9 ether), preventing any future inflation through additional minting (7.4 Economic).I-01

Issue

The TOTALSUPPLY is defined as a constant and all tokens are minted exclusively during the contract's deployment. There is no function to mint additional tokens after the initial distribution. This design ensures a fixed and immutable total supply of 1 billion tokens (1e9 ether), preventing any future inflation through additional minting (7.4 Economic).

Fix

This is a deliberate design choice that should be clearly communicated to all token holders and potential investors. Ensure that all project documentation, whitepapers, and public communications explicitly state that the token supply is fixed and cannot be increased.

Status

Unresolved

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Sep 4
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The Kaito token contract is a standard ERC20 implementation leveraging OpenZeppelin's battle-tested libraries, including ERC20Permit for gas-less approvals. The contract features a fixed total supply minted entirely during deployment. While technically robust, the initial distribution model concentrates all tokens in a predefined set of wallets, posing a centralization risk. The absence of administrative controls like pausing or blacklisting is a deliberate design choice that enhances decentralization but removes emergency response capabilities.

Technical8/10Low risk

The Kaito contract (7.1 Architecture) is a straightforward ERC20 token, inheriting robust and audited functionalities from OpenZeppelin's ERC20 and ERC20Permit libraries. The code (7.2 Code Security) is minimal, primarily extending standard token behavior with a constructor for initial distribution and a basic burn function. No complex logic or external interactions beyond standard token transfers are present, mitigating common technical vulnerabilities like reentrancy or integer overflows, which are handled by OpenZeppelin's battle-tested implementations.

Governance1/10High risk

The contract's economic model (7.4 Economic) establishes a fixed total supply of 1 billion tokens, all minted during deployment. A key design choice is the initial distribution (7.5 Governance), where the entire supply is allocated to a predefined list of wallets. This creates a high degree of centralization at launch, potentially allowing initial holders to exert significant influence. The absence of administrative controls (7.3 Access Control) like pausing or blacklisting means the token is immutable and decentralized in operation, but lacks emergency response capabilities.

Upgrades6/10Medium risk

The Kaito token contract is not designed as an upgradeable proxy (7.7 Upgrades). It is a standard, immutable contract deployed directly to the blockchain. This design choice eliminates upgrade-related risks such as proxy implementation vulnerabilities or administrative key compromise for upgrades, ensuring the contract's logic remains fixed post-deployment.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

The Kaito token contract is technically sound, leveraging well-audited OpenZeppelin libraries.

Focus should be placed on managing the implications of the highly centralized initial token distribution, ensuring transparency and clear communication regarding the project's long-term vision and governance (if any). Additionally, stakeholders should be aware of the immutable nature of the contract and the absence of emergency administrative controls, which means no intervention is possible post-deployment.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypeToken
NetworkBase
Token age1y
Contract0x98d0…7553
Deployer0xfd0d…a5f6
Badge for your website
KAITO security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Sep 4, 202648Medium
  2. Aug 31, 202642Medium

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the KAITO contract address?

The KAITO contract on Base is 0x98d0baa52b2d063e780de12f615f963fe8537553. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.

Is KAITO a scam?

Quantum Audit's risk score for KAITO is 48/100 (Medium risk) as of Sep 4, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Mint: No mint; Liquidity lock: Not locked; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.

Is KAITO liquidity locked?

Liquidity lock: Not locked (as of Sep 4, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $46.3K.

Who holds KAITO?

As of Sep 4, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 86.7% of the supply. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of KAITO?

Our AI-powered scanner gives you a deeper, real-time smart contract analysis — free, with every scoring factor shown.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page