Quantum Audit Logo

Is Infini a Scam?

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Infini IFN
0xe877…bf7f
Arbitrum
Not verifiedThis record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.
Last checked today 1 audit on record New Launch · 23h old
DexScreener ↗
How is this score calculated? → High Risk
Executive SummaryAI Copilot

No source code was provided for analysis. This report is based solely on the limited information available from the prefill data. A comprehensive security assessment requires access to the full contract source code to identify potential vulnerabilities and ensure adherence to security best practices.

1 Medium6 Informational
! Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (23h old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.
Volume 24h
$178.3K
Liquidity
$86.7K
Price
$0.1913
Token Age
23h
Top 10 Holders
93.5%

Security Findings

1 Med6 Info
Medium

Liquidity not locked

QA-LIQUIDITY0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 2 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a wallet, 0x0662…f13b — holds 99.7% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider.
Issue0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 2 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a wallet, 0x0662…f13b — holds 99.7% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider.
FixCheck the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

No code-level findings — contract source is not verified on the explorer

I-01The contract's source code has not been published or verified on the block explorer, so only its deployed bytecode and on-chain behaviour were available. No source-level vulnerability could be confirmed or ruled out. The assessment on this page rests on holder concentration.
IssueThe contract's source code has not been published or verified on the block explorer, so only its deployed bytecode and on-chain behaviour were available. No source-level vulnerability could be confirmed or ruled out. The assessment on this page rests on holder concentration.
FixTreat an unverified contract as unaudited at the code level. Ask the team to verify the source on the explorer, which makes an independent review possible.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

Who holds the supply

QA-HOLDERSThe ten largest holders own 93.5% of supply. What remains: 93.5% in wallets, 0.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 2.4%. 409 holders in total.
IssueThe ten largest holders own 93.5% of supply. What remains: 93.5% in wallets, 0.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 2.4%. 409 holders in total.
FixWatch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

Not listed by any independent source

QA-IDENTITY409 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Issue409 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
FixMatch the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

The market for this token

QA-MARKETLiquidity $87K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $178K (DexScreener, all pools).
IssueLiquidity $87K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $178K (DexScreener, all pools).
FixSize any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

Asset class: Project token

QA-PROFILEA token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $87K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
IssueA token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $87K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
FixCheck the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

Recently launched — less than a day of market history

QA-RECENTThe token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
IssueThe token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
FixRe-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
StatusAcknowledged

Category Ratings

TechnicalMedium6/10

Without access to the contract's source code, a detailed technical analysis of its architecture, code security, and access control mechanisms (7.1, 7.2, 7.3) cannot be performed. Therefore, no specific strengths or weaknesses can be identified regarding reentrancy, integer overflows, or other common vulnerabilities. The lack of visibility prevents any assessment of implementation quality or adherence to secure coding standards.

GovernanceHigh1/10

The economic model and governance structure (7.4, 7.5) of the contract cannot be assessed without the underlying source code. Potential risks related to tokenomics, flash loan vulnerabilities, or centralized control remain unknown. Operational aspects (7.8) such as pause mechanisms or emergency shutdowns also cannot be evaluated.

UpgradesMedium6/10

Without source code, it is impossible to determine if the contract employs an upgrade mechanism (7.7) or if it is immutable. Therefore, no assessment of upgrade safety, proxy patterns, or potential upgrade path risks can be made. External interactions (7.6) with other protocols or oracles also cannot be analyzed.

Security Checklist

1/5 checks passed
Contract VerifiedFail
Ownership Renounced?
No Mint Function?
Liquidity LockedFail
Not a ProxyPass
HoneypotNoneBuy Tax0.0%Sell Tax0.0%

Holder Composition

93.5% in top 10
93.5% in wallets0.0% in contracts
Effective Concentration93.5%

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Liquidity Depth

$86.7K

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

LP Distribution

Top-1 Unlocked Holder99.7%
Top-3 Unlocked100.0%

Key Addresses

3 addresses
Deployer
0xb0b9…d3c6
Unlocked LP Held By
0x0662…f13b0x1d2a…158c

No privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.

What Raised This Score

5 factors
  • Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
  • Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
  • Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool) — held by independent providers — market-depth risk
  • Top-10 concentration > 70% (93.5% total → 93.5% effective; 93.5% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts)
  • Contract source NOT verified — its logic cannot be read

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Related Audits

6 more on the record
Coinbase Wrapped BTC (CBBTC)High RiskChipHigh RiskAgentum (AGT)High RiskAXIS Robotics (AXROB)High RiskOrnn Exchange (ORNN)High RiskVision (VSN)High Risk

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Infini?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit