The IMO contract is an ERC-20 token with LayerZero OFT functionality, enabling cross-chain transfers. It is owned by an EOA. The audit identified a medium-severity issue related to token minting, where privileged addresses can increase the total supply, potentially diluting existing token holders. All fields are filled based on the provided information.
On-chain security analysis — is it a scam or legit?
Is IMO Safe?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The IMO contract is an ERC-20 token with LayerZero OFT functionality, enabling cross-chain transfers.
Read the full analysis- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded; held by endpoint: Other-Contract
- Liquidity not locked
- Top-10 concentration > 30%
Exact factors
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded; held by endpoint: Other-Contract
- Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool; this pool is 100% of DEX liquidity) — who holds it cannot be verified
- Top-10 concentration > 30% (51.1% total → 33.1% effective; 33.1% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts; 18.0% burned, locked or in pools excluded)
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Oct 15Holders
as of audit · Oct 15, 2026- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell33.1%
- Lockedtime-locked14.0%
- DEX poolsthe pools' own liquidity4.0%
- Everyone else71,501 holders48.9%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 15, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Oct 15- Uniswap v3WETHAnalysed$293.0K99.7%
- BalancerWETH$4420.2%
- Uniswap v4ETH$2840.1%
- Uniswap v4USDC$150.0%
- Uniswap v4USDC$80.0%
The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.
0xd537…9ce70x233c…2a18Security Findings
MediumPrivileged Address Can Mint New Tokens
The IMO token contract allows a specific privileged address, identified as the LayerZero endpoint, to create new tokens. This can happen through the send, lzReceiveSimulate, and lzReceive functions. If this endpoint address is compromised or misused, it could lead to an uncontrolled increase in the total supply of IMO tokens.CP-01
Issue
The IMO token contract allows a specific privileged address, identified as the LayerZero endpoint, to create new tokens. This can happen through the send, lzReceiveSimulate, and lzReceive functions. If this endpoint address is compromised or misused, it could lead to an uncontrolled increase in the total supply of IMO tokens.
Fix
Token holders should be aware that the LayerZero endpoint has the power to mint new tokens, which could dilute the value of their holdings. It is crucial for the project team to secure the endpoint address with the highest level of operational security, such as a multi-signature wallet, to prevent unauthorized minting and protect the token's economic stability.
Status
Unresolved
MediumLiquidity not locked
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 2 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0xd537…9ce7 — holds 80.7% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY
Issue
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 2 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0xd537…9ce7 — holds 80.7% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.
Fix
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 51.1% of supply. Of that, 14.0% locked, 4.0% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 33.1% in wallets, 0.0% in other contracts. 71,511 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 51.1% of supply. Of that, 14.0% locked, 4.0% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 33.1% in wallets, 0.0% in other contracts. 71,511 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoListed, but not independently verified
Listed on CoinGecko as IMO (IMO), market cap $6M, rank #1495. 71,511 holders.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
Listed on CoinGecko as IMO (IMO), market cap $6M, rank #1495. 71,511 holders.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $294K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $103K (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $120K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $294K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $103K (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $120K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a single wallet (EOA). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $294K of DEX liquidity across 8 pools. Launch: 727 days of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a single wallet (EOA). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $294K of DEX liquidity across 8 pools. Launch: 727 days of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 15The IMO contract implements ERC-20 standards and integrates LayerZero OFT for cross-chain token transfers (7.1 Architecture). Core ERC-20 functions like transfer and balanceOf are present. However, the contract allows privileged addresses, specifically the LayerZero endpoint, to mint new tokens via send, lzReceiveSimulate, and lzReceive functions (7.2 Code Security). This minting capability, tied to an external dependency (LayerZero endpoint, 7.6 External), can lead to token supply inflation and dilution of existing holders.
The contract's ownership is retained by an External Owned Account (EOA), granting the owner significant control over administrative functions such as setMsgInspector, setEnforcedOptions, and setPeer (7.3 Access Control). While this centralized control allows for efficient management, it also concentrates power. The economic model is significantly impacted by the ability of the LayerZero endpoint to mint new tokens, which could dilute the value for existing token holders (7.4 Economic). There is no explicit governance mechanism beyond the owner's control (7.5 Governance), and operational security for the owner and endpoint addresses is critical (7.8 Operations).
The IMO contract is not deployed as a proxy and therefore does not support upgradeability (7.7 Upgrades). This eliminates risks associated with upgrade mechanisms, such as proxy misconfigurations or malicious upgrade paths. However, it also means that any future changes or bug fixes would require a new contract deployment and migration.
It is recommended to carefully manage the LayerZero endpoint address, as it holds the power to mint new tokens.
Implement robust operational security practices for this address to prevent unauthorized token inflation. Consider implementing a multi-signature wallet for the endpoint or owner roles to enhance security and decentralize control over critical functions, reducing single points of failure.
Contract & Record
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of IMO?
Our AI-powered scanner gives you a deeper, real-time smart contract analysis — free, with every scoring factor shown.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page