The GTA token is a standard ERC-20 implementation. The architecture is straightforward, utilizing OpenZeppelin's standard library for core token functionality. A critical logic flaw exists in the transfer mechanism that may cause integration issues with external protocols, though the contract lacks centralized privileged controls.

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is GTA VI a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The GTA token is a standard ERC-20 implementation. The architecture is straightforward, utilizing OpenZeppelin's standard library for core token functionality.
Read the full analysis- Liquidity < $50k
- Top-10 concentration > 20%
- Code: Incorrect Return Value in Transfer Functions
Exact factors
- Liquidity < $50k ($17,279 across 1 pairs — thin market)
- Top-10 concentration > 20% (35.9% total → 22.0% effective; 12.8% in EOAs, 23.1% in contracts)
- Code: Incorrect Return Value in Transfer Functions (High, static analysis)
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Oct 30Holders
as of audit · Oct 30, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking23.1%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell12.8%
- Everyone else191 holders64.1%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 30, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Oct 30The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are locked or burned.
Security Findings
HighIncorrect Return Value in Transfer Functions
The transfer and transferFrom functions contain logic inconsistencies regarding the return values defined in the MAxTradingIdentifierLimits and _transfer internal calls. This deviation from the ERC-20 standard can cause external smart contracts that rely on the boolean return value to revert or fail unexpectedly.CD-01
Issue
The transfer and transferFrom functions contain logic inconsistencies regarding the return values defined in the MAxTradingIdentifierLimits and _transfer internal calls. This deviation from the ERC-20 standard can cause external smart contracts that rely on the boolean return value to revert or fail unexpectedly.
Fix
Ensure that the transfer and transferFrom functions strictly follow the ERC-20 specification by returning a boolean 'true' upon successful execution and reverting on failure, without relying on non-standard internal return paths.
Status
Unresolved
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 35.9% of supply. What remains: 12.8% in wallets, 23.1% in other contracts. 201 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 35.9% of supply. What remains: 12.8% in wallets, 23.1% in other contracts. 201 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
201 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
201 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoLiquidity burned — cannot be withdrawn
100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY
Issue
100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.
Fix
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $17K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $78K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $17K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $78K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $17K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $17K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 30The contract follows standard ERC-20 patterns with 7.1 Architecture and 7.2 Code Security adhering to established OpenZeppelin practices. 7.3 Access Control is absent, meaning no privileged roles exist to manipulate state. However, 7.6 External integration is compromised by a return value inconsistency in the transfer path, which may cause failures in automated DeFi interactions.
The token lacks 7.5 Governance mechanisms, operating as a permissionless asset. 7.4 Economic parameters are fixed by the initial supply and standard ERC-20 logic. There are no inflationary or deflationary mechanics present, ensuring predictable tokenomics for holders.
The contract is not upgradeable, satisfying 7.7 Upgrades requirements by being immutable. 7.8 Operations are limited to standard token transfers. No proxy patterns are utilized, eliminating risks associated with implementation updates.
The project should address the return value discrepancy in the transfer functions to ensure full compatibility with the ERC-20 standard.
This will prevent potential failures when the token is used within automated smart contract vaults or decentralized exchanges. Given the lack of administrative controls, the token is immutable and transparent. Users should verify the contract address against official sources before interacting, as no further updates or emergency pauses are possible.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Oct 30, 202646Medium
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the GTA6 contract address?
The GTA VI (GTA6) contract on Ethereum is 0x19d5a29c82afab60fe6047b8437c1858789b3150. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.
Is GTA VI a scam?
Quantum Audit's risk score for GTA VI is 46/100 (Medium risk) as of Oct 30, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Mint: No mint; Liquidity lock: Locked; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.
Is GTA6 liquidity locked?
Liquidity lock: Locked (as of Oct 30, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $17.3K.
Who holds GTA6?
As of Oct 30, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 35.9% of the supply across 201 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of GTA VI?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified