The GTAPEPE token is a standard ERC-20 implementation. The audit identified a critical flaw in the transfer logic where the contract fails to properly handle return values in specific trading limit functions, potentially causing integration issues with decentralized exchanges. The contract lacks administrative control functions, which ensures immutability but prevents emergency intervention.

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is GTA Pepe a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The GTAPEPE token is a standard ERC-20 implementation. The audit identified a critical flaw in the transfer logic where the contract fails to properly handle return values in specific trading limit functions, potentially causing integration issues with decentralized exchanges.
Read the full analysis- Liquidity < $50k
- Top-10 concentration > 20%
- Code: Incorrect Return Values in Trading Logic
Exact factors
- Liquidity < $50k ($18,597 across 1 pairs — thin market)
- Top-10 concentration > 20% (42.1% total → 26.7% effective; 16.5% in EOAs, 25.7% in contracts)
- Code: Incorrect Return Values in Trading Logic (High, static analysis)
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Oct 29Holders
as of audit · Oct 29, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking25.7%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell16.5%
- Everyone else166 holders57.9%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 29, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Oct 29The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are locked or burned.
Security Findings
HighIncorrect Return Values in Trading Logic
The functions MAxTradingIdentifierLimits, _transfer, returnTx, transfer, and transferFrom contain logic that fails to correctly return the expected boolean values required by the ERC-20 standard. This can cause external contracts, such as decentralized exchanges, to incorrectly interpret the success or failure of a token transfer.CD-01
Issue
The functions MAxTradingIdentifierLimits, _transfer, returnTx, transfer, and transferFrom contain logic that fails to correctly return the expected boolean values required by the ERC-20 standard. This can cause external contracts, such as decentralized exchanges, to incorrectly interpret the success or failure of a token transfer.
Fix
Update the affected functions to explicitly return 'true' upon successful execution and ensure all internal logic paths conform to the ERC-20 interface specification.
Status
Unresolved
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 42.1% of supply. What remains: 16.5% in wallets, 25.7% in other contracts. 176 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 42.1% of supply. What remains: 16.5% in wallets, 25.7% in other contracts. 176 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
176 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
176 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoLiquidity burned — cannot be withdrawn
100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY
Issue
100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.
Fix
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $19K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $35K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $19K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $35K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Meme token
A community token whose value comes from attention rather than a product. Being a meme is not a risk in itself: it is scored on exactly the same contract and market facts as any other token. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: meme vocabulary in name/ticker (pepe). Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $19K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A community token whose value comes from attention rather than a product. Being a meme is not a risk in itself: it is scored on exactly the same contract and market facts as any other token. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: meme vocabulary in name/ticker (pepe). Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $19K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Expect attention-driven volatility; the facts in this report say whether the contract itself can be used against holders.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 29The architecture follows standard OpenZeppelin ERC-20 patterns, providing a reliable foundation for token transfers. The code is clean and adheres to modern Solidity standards (0.8.23). However, the implementation of custom trading limit logic introduces a high-severity bug regarding return values that disrupts standard ERC-20 compatibility.
The token has no governance or administrative functions, meaning the economic parameters are fixed at deployment. This eliminates risks associated with centralized rug-pulls or malicious owner actions. The lack of flexibility is a trade-off for total decentralization.
The contract is not a proxy and does not support upgrades. This ensures that the code cannot be altered post-deployment, providing high security against malicious logic changes. Users can rely on the current code remaining static indefinitely.
The developer should immediately refactor the trading limit functions to ensure they correctly return boolean values as expected by standard ERC-20 interfaces.
This will prevent potential failures when interacting with automated market makers or other DeFi protocols. Given the lack of administrative functions, ensure all deployment parameters are verified before launch, as no post-deployment adjustments are possible. Users should be aware that the current implementation may cause transaction failures on certain platforms due to the identified return value bug.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Oct 29, 202647Medium
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of GTA Pepe?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified