The audited contract is a standard ERC-20 token implementation. The architecture follows established OpenZeppelin patterns, ensuring standard compliance for transfers and allowances. A high-severity issue was identified regarding return value consistency in the transfer logic, which may impact integration with certain DeFi protocols.

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is Grand Dacity Coin a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The audited contract is a standard ERC-20 token implementation.
Read the full analysis- Liquidity < $50k
- Code: Inconsistent Return Values in Transfer Functions
Exact factors
- Liquidity < $50k ($47,174 across 2 pairs — thin market)
- Code: Inconsistent Return Values in Transfer Functions (High, static analysis)
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Nov 5Holders
as of audit · Nov 5, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking22.8%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell6.4%
- Everyone else330 holders70.8%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Nov 5, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Nov 5The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are locked or burned.
Security Findings
HighInconsistent Return Values in Transfer Functions
The _transfer function and related transfer/transferFrom methods do not consistently handle return values as expected by some external protocols. This can cause integration failures where the calling contract expects a boolean success indicator that may not be correctly propagated or handled in specific edge cases.CD-01
Issue
The _transfer function and related transfer/transferFrom methods do not consistently handle return values as expected by some external protocols. This can cause integration failures where the calling contract expects a boolean success indicator that may not be correctly propagated or handled in specific edge cases.
Fix
Ensure that all transfer-related functions explicitly return a boolean value as defined by the ERC-20 standard and that the internal _transfer logic does not interfere with the expected return flow of the public-facing functions.
Status
Unresolved
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 29.2% of supply. What remains: 6.4% in wallets, 22.8% in other contracts. 340 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 29.2% of supply. What remains: 6.4% in wallets, 22.8% in other contracts. 340 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
340 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
340 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoLiquidity burned — cannot be withdrawn
100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY
Issue
100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.
Fix
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $47K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $453K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $47K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $453K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $47K of DEX liquidity across 2 pools. Launch: 1 days of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $47K of DEX liquidity across 2 pools. Launch: 1 days of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — 1 day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is 1 day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is 1 day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Nov 5The contract utilizes standard OpenZeppelin libraries for 7.1 Architecture and 7.2 Code Security. 7.3 Access Control is absent as there are no privileged roles, which minimizes attack surface. 7.6 External interactions are limited to standard ERC-20 operations, though the return value discrepancy in 7.2 Code Security requires attention.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance factors are not applicable as the contract is a simple token without staking, minting, or voting mechanisms. The lack of administrative control ensures no 7.8 Operations risk regarding centralization. The token supply is fixed upon deployment.
The contract is not a proxy, meaning 7.7 Upgrades risk is non-existent. The code is immutable, providing high confidence in long-term behavior. No upgrade paths exist for the logic or state.
The contract is functionally sound for basic token transfers.
To ensure full compatibility with all DeFi protocols, the transfer logic should be updated to strictly adhere to the ERC-20 specification regarding return values. Ensure that all future integrations verify the boolean return of transfer functions to prevent potential failures in automated systems that expect strict adherence to the ERC-20 standard.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Nov 5, 202642Medium
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the GDC contract address?
The Grand Dacity Coin (GDC) contract on Ethereum is 0x9fd621bc85aa080e99d10263df0449de4e19b74d. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.
Is Grand Dacity Coin a scam?
Quantum Audit's risk score for Grand Dacity Coin is 42/100 (Medium risk) as of Nov 5, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Mint: No mint; Liquidity lock: Locked; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.
Is GDC liquidity locked?
Liquidity lock: Locked (as of Nov 5, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $47.2K.
Who holds GDC?
As of Nov 5, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 29.2% of the supply across 340 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Grand Dacity Coin?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified